Truth and Certainty with Jared Byas / Transcript

Note: Can I Say This at Church is produced for audio listening. If able, I strongly encourage you to listen to the audio, which has inflection, emotion, sarcasm where applicable, and emphasis for points that may not come across well in written word. This transcript is generated using a combination of my ears and software, and may contain errors. Please check the episode for clarity before quoting in print.

Back to the Audio Episode


Jared 0:00

Some of these things are just…they become apparent when you read the Bible really carefully. And I think that's really the challenge. You don't have to be a scholar to realize that the days of creation don't match. And that there's contradictions in the two creation narratives. You don't have to be a Hebrew scholar to just know that because you can see that in English. You know, and the same with noticing that David kills Goliath and then Elhanan kills Goliath. Like you can read that in English. And so I think it's not so much do we know Hebrew it's have we been reading our Bible carefully? We usually inherit a certain framework for what the Bible is, what these stories mean, from a very young age. And so I think we kind of turn our brains off by the time we are teenagers, and in our 20s, and we no longer read the Bible carefully. We just reaffirm and concretize that interpretation we've always been receiving since we were kids. So I'm a big advocate for you not to be scholar but if you take your time, and just read the Bible carefully, you'll run into a lot of problems. And I mean that in the best possible way.

Seth Price 1:18

Hey, everybody, welcome back. I am Seth, and I'm so glad that you are here. Before we get going, would you do me a favor? As of recording this I think there's 98 reviews on iTunes. Let's just make that 100. It's one of those things that the algorithms decide, oh, other people like this. And so this new person looking for, you know, a podcast, talking about God, you know, they may enjoy this. And so that's, I'm sure it's a small part, but go ahead and rate and review the show on iTunes. I would appreciate it, you would appreciate me appreciating it. I feel like you would. Anyway, a couple other brief announcements, so remember, really appreciate it if you would think about supporting the show on Patreon. This show could not be done without the support of the patron supporters. Man, there's no way to adequately describe the impact that we all do that I've had on just this shows ability to continue and you know, my life personally and the relationships that have grown from that. And so let me encourage you jump into that if you've ever been on the fence or the show speaks to you in any way, I would greatly appreciate it. There is also, I decided I wanted some merchandise for myself, and so I made that and you'll find that at Can I Say This At Church.com, you'll click a button that says store and a couple different things. Check that out. See if you find something you like. And if you don't let me know, and I will figure out how to make it. Anyway, here we go.

The conversation today is Jared Byas and we talk about truth. We talk about the Old Testament we talk about certainty. And we talk about idolatry because all of those things can be idolatrous, but mostly certainty in the way that we view truth. It's a very fun conversation. I laugh quite a bit in it. And those are always near and dear to my heart. And as you'll hear in the beginning of the episode, Jared coming back is deeply meaningful because well, I don't want to spoil it. You'll literally hear it in the first few minutes of the episode. So here we go. I'm gonna roll the tape with Jared Byas.

Seth Price 3:45

Jared Byas, welcome back to the show, man. I'm gonna firstly say, thank you, but you'll understand why in a minute. So I think I told you last time, but you're actually the first person that said “yes” to come onto the show. And so I don't know what episode this will be when this airs. Let's say 95 and if it's not, then I'm not fixing that in the edit. (But) A lot of that is because you said yes. As opposed to discouraging this idiot from Virginia. So, welcome back to the show, man.

Jared 4:10

Hey, that's…I really appreciate that. Absolutely. Yeah, it's my honor. I mean, I had I remember distinctly remember having a great time, and especially Seth, you're just genuine curiosity and humility in the process. So that stuck out to me for sure. So it's great to be back on.

Seth Price 4:26

Well, what has changed? I don't necessarily need your story of you. Because for those that want to hear that, I think it's like Episode 2, 1, 3, 4, something like that. It's been a long time ago, almost two years, which doesn't seem like it's been that long. So what has changed, you know, from 2017 to now-what's new in your world?

Jared 4:43

Well, you know, the podcast The Bible for Normal People has, I think we've remained pretty consistent in our mission to bring the best in Biblical scholarship to everyday people. And so I don't think a lots changed there. I'm still really passionate about that. And I think I've maybe gotten better at talking to normal people. But I think that's, that's about it. I mean, I'm working through a book right now. And just thinking of like, all the concepts that are come to mind are the concepts that I've really been trying to work out for probably the last seven or eight years since I left being a pastor. And yeah, so I'm just trying to continue to work all that out.

Seth Price 5:25

Yeah. What qualifies someone as a normal people? What are the minimum parameters to be a normal people?

Jared 5:30

We get that all the time. It's like, well I listen to your podcast, but I don't know if I'm normal. Of course, all we mean by that is someone who didn't go to seminary and doesn't know all the big words and still wants to learn how to be a faithful Christian but doesn't necessarily have the pedigree. And so we want to bring all these really smart concepts that can be helpful to people and just translate them for everyday people.

Seth Price 5:58

I had someone, a friend of mine, that went to seminary that said, what I'm doing with this is like a miniature version of seminary in real time. And I don't know if I agree with that, because I've never been to seminary, but being that you do something similar, is it?

Jared 6:13

Yeah, I think so. I mean, I really think that is the mission. I think. I do agree. I think you do the same thing. And, but in actually in sometimes a more entertaining format, and in a way that's a little bit more accessible, relatable.

Seth Price 6:29

I hope so. I figured I would start out with a very important question. And that's going to be Carson Wentz. I feel like we said this last time but I don't know how you're an Eagles fan being from Texas but I mean…

Jared 6:43

You’re gonna get me into trouble with all my family. Hopefully doesn't listen to this.

Seth Price 6:48

Well, I'm assuming that they know that you're an Eagles fan.

Jared 6:50

They do its just that we don't talk about that. You're bringing it out.

Seth Price 6:54

Well, I mean, that's they can

Jared 6:56

Thanks a lot.

Seth Price 6:58

Just hit fast forward by 30 seconds (Jared chuckled) So how do you feel about him? Because you'll have like four quarterbacks and you want to pay all of them QB 1 kind of money. And that has nothing to do with church or the Bible. But I don't care.

Jared 7:12

Thats is how you win championships?

Seth Price 7:15

Is it though?

Jared 7:16

Well, I don't know..let's just check two years ago, I think…Oh, I see. Yeah. (Chuckles)

Seth Price 7:21

Oh. I see

Well, I think that you're you had a rookie getting paid nothing that did the job of a guy that busted his knee. Getting paid all the money. Just got all the money.

Jared 7:30

(Huge laughter) Yes, yes. Yeah. I'm not sure how I feel about that at this point. I am learning through also being a 76’s fan that you have to trust the process.

Seth Price 7:40

How did you get all-in on Philly teams?

Jared 7:43

Well, I'm still very much loyal to the Mavericks. I actually flew out to see Dirk’s last game just two months ago.

Seth Price 7:51

I saw that somewhere, you put a picture up of an airplane.

Jared 7:57

I’m definitely still loyal to the Mavericks. But I'm saying 76er’s fan too. But I grew up hating the Cowboys. So it just was so fitting to me that that I ended up in Philadelphia.

Seth Price 8:07

I had a guy asked me once he's like, why the Cowboys? You know, you're in Virginia now and you still root for him? I'm like, Well, when I grew up, it was the Oilers, or the Cowboys, and the Oilers were so good that they packed up shop, change your name, and move to Tennessee. So it wasn't the Oilers.

Jared 8:24

But that's why I didn't like Dallas. I didn't like Dallas, because they were always so good. And I just didn't like football. But that's all anyone ever wanted to talk about.

Seth Price 8:32

It's Texas. So yeah, um, so question. So while I have you on, I feel like and correct me if I'm wrong. where you're at, would you lean more towards a more of an expert, and we use those terms less loosely, a better versed in Old Testament as opposed to New Testament, correct?

Jared 8:56

Correct.

Seth Price 8:57

Yeah. So I have a lot of people tell me that when we read the Bible, and so we could define what the Bible is but lets not, that do it in a narrative way. What does that even mean? Like I was talking with a guy the other day. And he said the same thing is like, yeah, it's not written this way. We read it wrong. Formatting matters. Everything matters. And so you need to read it as a narrative. But there's multiple narratives, and there's multiple types of literature. And so how do I read it in a narrative way? What does that even mean?

Jared 9:21

Right? Well, there's the idea of narrative theology, which I think someone like Daniel Kirk, who we've had on the podcast does a really good job with in the New Testament. And he talks about it through Mark and doing narrative theology in that way. But yeah, I agree. I think there's a few ways to look at that one is making sure we understand the Bible is literature. And so there are ways in which we are triggered to read certain things certain ways. So I think it's important to recognize (that) the Bible is literature. That was a big thing. I think probably in the 80s and early 90s of this like renaissance of “Oh, yeah. Hey, guys, the Bible is literature, and all the things that you know about literature they apply to the Bible too”.

So you know, things like I had a professor who constantly said is like a mantra that says, genre triggers reading strategy. So meaning if you know the genre that triggers the strategy used to read it. And so it's really important to identify the genre of what you're reading. So if you're reading poetry you have to understand Hebrew poetry and how that would have been written and understood at that time. And if it's supposed to be, you know, like, I wanted to put some things like historical fiction, which would have been not a genre that they would have recognized. And that's I think, where we also get into trouble is we have all these categories now that they just wouldn't have had back then.

And so in some scientific, or historical critical way or literary criticism, it helps us to identify it. We put in our categories, but we have to realize that that's that is anachronistic meaning back then they wouldn't have understood what we were talking about. So they blend and blurred things. Like for instance, we would maybe consider the, the historical books, we call them the historical books. I think it's very telling that in the Jewish Bible, they call it the former prophets. Things like Samuel and Kings. Samuel and Kings aren't historical books in the Jewish tradition they are the former prophets. And so that's an important distinction, like we've already pigeonholed what it is by calling them the historical book, Samuel Kings. And also, you know, interestingly enough, kind of going down that same rabbit trail, in the Jewish Bible, the last books of the Bible are 1 and 2 Chronicles. They end with 1 and 2 Chronicles, for very, like purposeful reasons. But in the Jewish Bible, there's three sections you have your Torah, which is your law and instructions, the first five books, you have your Nevi'im, which are the prophets, which include things like Samuel and Kings, and you have the Ketuvim, which is just the writings. And Chronicles isn’t in the writings it's in the other stuff. And actually that says a lot again. So for if we are linking that genre triggers reading strategy, I always like looking at how the, how Judaism categorizes its texts because they just have such a deeper, in my understanding, usually a deeper, richer tradition. And it says a lot. Like Daniel isn't in the prophets its in the Ketuvim. And so that says something about how they held those books.

And just to kind of finish that thought that's why if you go to Barnes and Noble and look for Jewish Bible, it's called the Tanakh. And that's because it's those three sections TNK, stand for Torah, Nevi’im, and Ketuvim.

Seth Price 12:50

So that's an acronym, I didn’t know that. Well, I don't know if acronyms the right word.

Jared 12:55

Right that’s why I didn’t use it. I think it's an acronym right.

Seth Price 12:58

But why don't know what the “a” in there matter. Maybe they're just It doesn't matter.

Jared 13:02

Yeah, those are just vowels to get you to say it correctly.

Seth Price 13:06

Yeah. That's the phonetic pronunciation of the three letters. Yeah. So I've never heard that about Chronicles. I've heard that about the Tanakh. But honestly, it was only maybe in the last two, three years. So I got a copy of Bibliotheca. And he has brick…broken…brick…desegregated. I don't know what the word is—reordered it in a very different way. And so I found myself as I was reading, taken out of context, or what I thought would be there was not there. And it did change like it changed I don't know if it changed the way that I read Scripture because it was in a different order, or if it changed it because it forced me to think about things in a different pattern. I don't actually know. But why does that matter? Like Chronicles being at the end why does that matter?

Jared 13:49

Well, it matters for two reasons. One would be it's very interesting that the Christian Bible ends with these Minor Prophets that basically quote unquote, prophesied the coming of the Messiah. So you in the Old Testament with his trajectory toward the New Testament, that's very intentional. Where Chronicles with a retelling of the history of Israel in a post exotic setting. And so the questions that Chronicles is answering, the questions Chronicles are answering, are different than the questions that kings is answering. So there's no doubt that Chronicles is, is basically sitting there with kings open and rewriting that narrative.

And it's clear that as you read through that there's a reason why Chronicles looks the way it does. It's asking different questions. So if Kings is asking the question, why are we in exile? So Samuel-Kings seems to be a book that's asking that question. Why are we in exile? And that's why the kings in that story are so bad. And the classic example of this is King Manasseh, who's like the worst king. Who commits all these atrocities and leads Israel into idolatry and it ends with him being despised and an abomination in God's eyes. And then Chronicles has this telling of Manasseh, where he's actually taken down to Babylon. And then he repents, and then God restores my Manasseh and all is well. Well, that's not in Kings. That's not how that story happens. They're like, those are not the same story of this king, Manasseh. And the reason is, is because Chronicles is written at a different time with a different purpose in mind. The question now isn't, why are we in exile? Because Chronicles is written post exilic it's written after the exile and we’ve come back into the land and now the question are we still God’s people now they're in this desolated space?

And they've just been the very thing that they thought God had promised back in Samuel, 2 Samuel 7, I guess, 14 or 14:7, you know, that they will have forever King from the line of David sitting on the throne. They didn't have that. They were thrown into exile for you know, several decades. They come back. And now they're wondering what…what just happened? Are we still God's people?

And so that's why you would expect then the very boring for us beginning of Chronicles is just chapter after chapter after chapter of genealogy, because they're trying to connect their story with the pre exilic people and asking that question are we still God’s people? And so the story of Manasseh is an answer to that story. Yes. Manasseh repents, even the worst can still come back and still be connected to God's people and still be a part of this grand thing.

So I think that's important to recognize why Chronicles then is at the end is because it's asking that question, which is a much more rich and important question, meaningful question for the Israelites at that time.

Seth Price 16:47

I want to clarify something in Chronicles it's still not giving you the genealogy or it is? I still don't read the Old Testament as much as I should.

Jared 16:53

Yeah, Chronicles begins with this like chapter after chapter of genealogy.

Seth Price 16:55

So then how would that then relate for you and I with I believe it's Matthew that also begins with the genealogy all the way up? Although I feel like it's different than Chronicles, but um, this is from memory and I don't have it in front of me. Well, I have a different version that doesn't have verses in it in front of me, which won't be helpful. Is that intentional? Like, we're going to do this genealogy here. And then we're going to start in the New Testament with Matthew, we're going to do it again.

Jared 17:20

I mean, I would say it's very often that genealogies are trying to provide continuity. Trying to say we're connected this people before and we now as the audience of this are the same people and we are connected.

Seth Price 17:35

Thinking about the genres. So if we have 86 today, an arbitrary number, like how many mattered, you know, to the to the ancient near us, you know, the the Jews at the time, like if we're talking about the different genres that they're reading. And then yeah, how do I know that like as a normal people like how would I know like, how’s that even possible?

Jared 17:56

Yeah, well, you know, and this is where it's helpful, but also can be tricky because our translators do that work for us. So like, we had Robert Alter on the podcast not too long ago, he just spent 20 years retranslating the whole Old Testament. And one of his points he made was like, he doesn't like modern translations because they think that we're all dumb. So they make all these decisions for us, rather than just letting the text be what it is they sort of interpret it for us. And so it seems so small, you know, you talked earlier about what doesn't matter what order the books are in, but you don't even think about it when you open to Psalm and you see that it's formatted in a different way. It's set off like poetry.

Well, that genre triggers a reading strategy when you see that, just like if you hear the rustling of a newspaper, and it looks like a newspaper, and it's on that thin paper, and it's folded that way. And it's black and white. And you see the picture in the headline, you think “news”. And so you're going to read it in a certain way that says “news”. That's very different than when you get to the part of the newspaper that's in color, and there's these boxes that go across and you think, “oh, comic, that's a comic”. So it's like, almost subconsciously, we've changed our reading strategy without even thinking about it.

And the same is true when we see these things that tip us off in the Bible like, oh, now it's not in paragraph form. It's center justified. And it's line by line, we think poetry, and sometimes that's accurate. And there's some places in the Bible that's debatable, like, is this poetry or is this prose? And even that, I'm not sure…there's definitely some markers that they had something like poetry in the Hebrew Bible, but it doesn't look like ours. And some of those places are debatable whether this is poetry or whether it's prose.

Seth Price 19:41

This might be a question for like, Robert Alter, but there can't be a best version of the Bible, because they're all going to have a bias in the translation. And so, if we're going to read either, you know, the Apocrypha or the New Testament or the Old Testament, like how do we new nuance that? Like do I just need to get 17 versions of the Bible and read them all and figure out who's treating me less stupid, who's, you know, just looking for commonalities? How would one even go about doing that? Because I know most people, like I do know who Robert Alter is, but most people won't, or I do know through David Bentley Hart redid the New Testament, but most people won't. Most people were just going to go pick up that red leather bound in Barnes and Noble and then sit down with it.

Jared 20:25

Yeah. And I think that's okay. I mean, I think most New Testament, this is where I am, I'm not going to be a snob. Like I think that's okay. I do think the better translations or publishers of Bibles will footnote when they've made these decisions. So if you're reading the footnotes and you're reading, that's probably the best you'll get is being able to…

I think some of these things are just they become apparent when you read the Bible really carefully. I think that's really the challenge is you don't have to be a scholar to realize that the days of creation don't match. And that there's contradictions in the two creation narratives. You don't have to be a Hebrew scholar to just know that because you can see that in English. You know, and the same with noticing that David kills Goliath, and then Elhanan kills Goliath. Like you can read that in English.

And so I think it's not so much do we know Hebrew its have we been reading our Bible carefully? We usually inherit a certain framework for what the Bible is, what these stories mean, from a very young age. And so I think we kind of turn our brains off by the time we were teenagers, and in our 20s, and we no longer read the Bible carefully we just reaffirm and concretize that interpretation we've always been receiving since we were kids. So I'm a big advocate for you don't have to be a scholar but if you take your time and just read the Bible carefully, you'll run into a lot of problems. And I mean that in the best possible way.

Seth Price 21:57

No, I love the problems. This show is the results of those problems. And there's a bookshelf full of binders of notes and notes and notes. The problems are where I find Jesus.

Jared 22:12

Mm hmm!

Seth Price 22:13

But this is not a preaching show. So you have small kids as well, I saw one of them. I think recently do a backflip which scared the crap out of me on Instagram. I wasn't expecting that. I don't know what I was expecting. But it wasn't if you're listening. I don't know when it was and I don't know that it matters, but you can just troll Jared’s Instagram and

Jared 22:27

Yeah that terrified us to. I had no idea. It wasn't like, he wasn't like, Hey, watch me do a backflip. He just said Hey, watch this, and then he did a backflip.

Seth Price 22:36

I found myself thinking about that the other day. Somehow I saw it again. I must have been flipping through something and sometimes I get annoyed and I just hit it as fast as it can and it rolls for 10 seconds. That had to have been the second take or did he say get your phone video this watch this!

Jared 22:51

That was the second take. Yeah, that was the second one.

Seth Price 22:55

So you've got small kids. I have small kids. I've got a 10 year old and a 7 year old and how do I know Make sure that I'm pouring into them scripture in such a way that they don't check out at 15 or 12 and stop reading scripture carefully. Because I don't ever explain things well to my kids when they asked me a theological question, mostly because I'm realizing I don't really know the answer. And even if I did, there's probably three or four good ones and none of them that are right.

Jared 23:22

Well, I think what you said, I'm just gonna throw that back on you is I think there's a way so that you find Jesus in the problems. I think if you find the interesting thing in the warts and the imperfections of the text, we've just, I didn't grow up that way. I grew up thinking that the prettiest, most perfect Bible is the good Bible. And I just think that's not true in love. That's not true. Like, none of us have perfect spouses, but we come to love them not like in spite of those imperfections, but because of them. Those become the most endearing things once we are committed and we stay in that and we learn to love the people we see, because I think we need to learn to love the Bible we see. And over time, like, that's what's interesting to me. Those are the most engaging conversations I have with my kids, when we point out things, and when they say, Well, God created this and I'll say, Oh, yeah, in the first creation narrative, but in the second account, he's more intimate. And he does it this way. Oh, really? There's more though. Oh, man, that blows their mind. And it becomes interesting again, whenever, you know, questions, and uncertainties are interesting. We don't always like them. But they are very interesting.

And so for me, to keep me interested in the Bible, even when I was a kid, it was those curiosities I kept coming back too. Like, why is that like that? That doesn't make any sense. Right. If it all makes sense, and we just have it all buttoned up. I'm gonna get bored with it.

Seth Price 24:44

My middle child the other day, maybe you'll get a kick out of this. I was washing dishes and she looked at me She's like, was Adam and Eve last name Price? And I said, Why? And she's like, Well, our last names Price. And if they all I'm like, okay, no I don't know. No. I don't know. I don't know what to say to that. So, but I just I didn't even answer I just laughed like, it's just it was a naive question. Very funny. Very truthful. Very funny.

Jared 25:15

Yeah, I love using maybe and perhaps. I use that a lot with my kids.

Seth Price 25:21

You have, because you're a big deal now. I think I saw it on that black book. You're writing a book sometime now? Probably yesterday. Yeah, tomorrow. And from what i've gleaned from social media and reading in the margins, you're apparently dealing with truth and epistemology. Maybe I'm wrong. Hmm.

Jared 25:39

I don't use that term. But yeah.

Seth Price 25:43

Why?

Jared 25:44

Because it's not for normal people.

Seth Price 25:45

Epistemology,

Jared 25:46

Right

Seth Price 25:47

I didn't learn that word until I heard and maybe it was an episode of the Liturgists or Michael gore has a song called epistemological breakdown. And it sounds like a robot. I don't know if you've heard it or not.

Yeah, I'm not even going to try it here. I don't even know where it is, but they were talking about truth. And then you just hear a mix in. It was like a robotic banjofied song that just said epistemological breakdown. And as it as it saying, it broke further down into dissonant chords, it was just beautiful. And then I was like, well, what is this?

When you say truth, what angle are you going at? And what does that even mean? Because most people would say truth is relative to what I think is true.

Jared 26:46

Most people would say that?

Seth Price 26:47

I think so. I think most people I think most people would would if they were honest with themselves, they'll say that things are true, but the way that they act about things that are true is in deeply personal and has nothing to do with other people. I don't knew that they would say it out loud. But they're saying it with the way that they live, myself included. So what do we mean when we say true?

Jared 27:06

Yeah, well, I, you know, we're in an interesting time because we're also in a space with like alternative facts and people denying sort of scientific findings and evidence based claims. So I want to be careful on that side of things that I respect that and I want to not go against those things. But I also think we've made truth in idol, at least for me growing up in the church. That, like, what I was actually after was being certain about what's true. And that's what saves us if we get the things right, if we get the facts right about Jesus raising up from the dead. That's where salvation is. And that's what Christianity is all about, is getting the facts right.

Well, when we look at the Bible, it actually doesn't use truth in that way at all or very rarely. Primarily, in the Bible, at least truth is a very ethical term. Truth is a verb. So you do truth, you walk in truth, it doesn't over talk about believing in the truth. I mean, Jesus and John 14 says he is the truth, I am the way, the truth, and the life. What does that mean? Like, for some reason we have immediately translated that to mean, if you believe these facts about me, then you get into heaven. But that's not actually what it says says I am the way the truth and the life.

I don't actually even know what that means. I don't know what it means for a person to be the truth. And so what that that's where it started for me was thinking through, Oh, Jesus is the truth. Uh….what! Like it started short circuiting in my mind and had an epistemological breakdown, if you will, and started wondering, you know, and then even in our common sense, so what I what I'm doing in the book is breaking down some of the common ways we use the word truth. And helping us clarify that we often mean like facts; so truth facts, but then we also mean things that are meaningful. So when we say things like, that's true for me or that, you know, speaking my truth, we're talking about things that are significant to us. And that's not the same thing as facts, but it's maybe not less important than facts.

And then there's also this thing called wisdom truth. And these are just common ways that we use that phrase. And so I trace that through the Bible, and talk about how little the Bible talks about fact truths. It's really not interested in facts. It doesn't address them. It doesn't talk about facts as facts. I mean, that's a very enlightenment, post, sort of, rationalistic way of thinking about the world. And it's much more interested in the ethics of truth. Truth as honesty, truth as integrity, truth as acts of righteousness. Those are what it means to be truthful. And and so I try to recapture the ethics of truth telling. And it really is around this phrase that I used as a weapon. I used it as a weapon and it was used on me as a weapon telling the truth in love. And basically, which meant, the most important thing to do is tell the truth and if you can try to do it in a kind way. And I just think that's counter to what I see in the Bible.

Seth Price 30:16

What place do facts hold them for the church today? If truth is the way that we act our practices, as opposed to our doctrine, and I'm probably using doctrine wrongly, they're metaphorically comparing it to truth and you can correct me if I am. But what place two facts hold?

Jared 30:38

Well, I think facts are…I think facts are important, but I think that they are subservient to love. And so I think that it's not, which are more important. It's which one's driving, which is to be master. And I think we've put, again, idolatry for me is we've put—nowhere in the Scriptures is to say God is truth, it says Jesus is truth. But it does say God is love. And so I think there's something about a matter of emphasis and priority. So I do I mean, I'm all about facts. You know, I taught philosophy, I'm very interested in facts. However, I think we've bought into this idea, I think, from the right side of the spectrum and the left side of the spectrum, I call it the vending machine theory of facts. That somehow the world will be perfected when we get the facts about it, right. And I think that's just a naive, one dimensional, way of looking at the world. That's just not true. It's a very modernistic understanding of the world that the world is a machine. It's like this Rube Goldberg machine. It's perfectly set up. And if we just get the facts, right, if we just put that quarter in the vending machine, and we push the right numbers, outcomes, utopia!

And I think that's a un-nuanced, mechanical, view of the world, which would only be true if we were all robots. And we're not robots. And so I think that's important. But I think it's not a good use of our energy and resource be spending all of our talk. I mean, it goes even as basic as education, with our emphasis on STEM. And it's all about getting these students to learn mathematics and engineering and technology and science. And these are the things that will lead to this utopia. And yet we have not taught civics, and how to disagree, and how to respect and how to show civility and how to be kind. Like, I think those are just as important. And so I think it's just a matter of emphasis.

Seth Price 32:42

One of the questions I get often is, you know, listeners are sitting in their churches and then they'll hear a sermon, or there'll be talking after church at you know, lunch or whatever, Cracker Barrel because we're in the south, why not? And when someone says something that is truthful, but also entirely against I would call the heart of God. Like just is not like the way that you know our country, postures itself towards immigrants or that type of stuff? The question I get often is, well, how do I then have a discourse in a loving way? Because real quickly it devolves into that side of the family goes to that restaurant, and we're just gonna stay here

Jared 33:19

So why do you think it devolves?

Seth Price 33:22

From what you said earlier, like, people just don't know how to have arguments anymore. And I don't mean arguments in the yelling way. I mean, arguments in less structure, what I believe in why, and leave space in the middle. But I don't know how to tell people to do that. Like I don't like how would you practice that?

Jared 33:40

Well, I wouldn't ever tell someone how to do that. I would just invite them to…

Seth Price 33:45

Well (then) how do you do that?

Jared 33:47

I ask a lot of questions. And I ask a lot of questions because I always want to make sure that I understand first. I want to understand at a deep heart level where people are and why they are the way they are. And I think that's just so important. A lot of people just want to be heard. And they want to make sure that you understand their argument and why they're saying what they're saying. So, you know, there's a phrase I use a lot, it's just active listening, which is being able to repeat back to someone what you've heard, and make sure that the other person agrees with your interpretation of what they're saying, before you say anything about your own opinions. So I do that a lot of just saying, “Okay, let me make sure I'm hearing you, right. Is this what you're saying”? And if they say, “No, no, no”, then I keep listening to them until I get their position, right, in a way that they would agree with it.

Otherwise, we end up with these strawmen, where I'm arguing against something that they didn't even say. I'm just arguing against the most extreme example of what they said. And I find that really unhelpful, because it also comes back to why are we even talking? I don't talk to people to convince them of anything. I gave up on that a long time ago, I talked to people because I want to connect with them at a heart level, I want to be heard, and I want to hear them. And, for me, if that's the goal, then there's not as long as we're still talking, my goals being met, I don't need you to come to certain conclusions. I don't need you to want me to come to certain conclusions. I genuinely want you to feel heard and valued. And I want to feel heard and valued. So I think if we can keep those in mind we could do a lot better with the conversations.

Seth Price 35:30

So then how do we take it past the conversations? And I do want to bubble back up to a rabbit trail that you're talking about with utopia, because I like rabbit trails, but I want to stay on this thread for a minute. So you know, if I'm hearing you and let's say that you and I are vehemently disagreeing on why the Cowboys are better than the Eagles! And so I'm hearing you, you're hearing me we understand the Oilers were a dumpster on fire. And so that's why

Jared 35:54

Except for Warren Moon of course.

Seth Price 35:55

Yeah, but then he went to Minnesota and that I mean, he lost any credibility because it's like Emmitt Smith going to the Cardinals like, why would want…anyway. So like, I'm not going to bend, you're not going to bend. And it's trivial because it's sports. But when it's the way that we do church, or women in ministry, or the way that we raised children, or the way that we do our politics, or whatever matters to us, at a deeper level than sports, if I'm understanding what you're saying, and I can genuinely see where you're coming from, and I just believe that you're lost your flippin mind in the same what then?

Jared 36:34

Then, for me at least, I value being able to stay in your life over anything else, so it's fine. And this is will get me into trouble I think sometimes with my more progressive friends. But always in the back of my mind. I have these pages from Simone de Beauvoir, who wrote this book called The Ethics of Ambiguity. And in there, it's very Nietzschean. So Nietzsche says, you know, be careful when you stare into the abyss that it doesn't stare back into you. And Simone de Beauvoir in The Ethics of Ambiguity talks about these different kinds of people who engage in the world. And one of them, like, thinks they're doing good to build this sort of social revolution. But the means by which they do it, is to undermine the whole goal.

So if the way I engage with you isn't building the kind of world I want to be in, then the ends don't justify the means. Because it's just not logical that I'm going to build a more loving world by being angry and hateful. Even if I think I'm right about any of it that the process is just as important as the goal. And so you can't build you know, utopia with dystopian tactics.

And so for me, I always want to be the kind of person-I always want to act in a way that is modeling the kind of world I want to be in. So that's it for me is, at the end of the day, I value most keeping people in my life and having them understand I love them and I value them. So it doesn't matter. I mean, most of my family would disagree vehemently with most of my theology, and most of my politics, and that's okay. Like, it's okay. It's not okay that it sometimes can be discriminating. And I don't condone, you know, racism or bigotry in any of that. And so that's where it's, but I don't have to condone it to love people who aren't yet there. And it's also understanding that we're all on a journey. Like if I had people condemning me that I wasn't like supremely woke 15 years ago, I wouldn't be where I am now. Because that would have been such a turn off and I would have just retreated to my cave and like retrenched back into my beliefs. But instead, I had people inviting me into conversation and being generous with me and being forgiving when I didn't understand something, and when I said the wrong thing, and I use the wrong words, and that's what for me brings about change. It's not the rigid lines that we draw. And then we draw so many lines that eventually we're the only ones in our own box. And the only person who actually agrees with me is me.

Seth Price 39:25

I've never heard that. Is that you?

We draw so many lines. We're the only people in our own box.

Jared 39:35

Oh, I don't know. I just made that up.

Seth Price 39:37

I like it. I'm taking it.

Jared 39:39

Sure. I mean, I don't think I have any original thoughts. I'm sure.

Seth Price 39:39

(laughter from both)

I'm plagiarizing it from you plagiarized it. No, I won't.

Jared 39:42

Yes. That's all scholarship is just plagiarizing. We just changed the words a little bit.

Seth Price 39:48

Yeah. So I want to center on that word, utopia. So when you say utopia, what I think about is heaven. And when I think about heaven, I think about Shalom and the Kingdom of God.

Jared 40:00

Oh that is good! I still think about like, angels singing really boring songs and how I was so baffling as a kid like, why would I want to go there?

Seth Price 40:10

I'm gonna try this then why do you think that?

Jared 40:12

What do I think what?

Seth Price 40:13

You said you when someone says he would disagree with you try to ask more questions I said, so I thought I would try that about that about the angels. (Jared laughs) But that's what I think. And so when you say utopia, I'm assuming that you're saying that that's, you said it a few times. So that's like a goal, like ultimately all things. Can we just call that reconcilement? Or am I misusing what you're saying?

Jared 40:33

Yeah, I mean, I'm saying that a lot of people I think I would actually argue that utopia is not a good goal. I think more warfare violence has happened in the name of utopia than anything else.

Seth Price 40:45

I don't mean utopia is a governmental sense. I mean, it as a Jesus' sense of reconciling this.

Jared 40:53

How do you do that without government?

Seth Price 40:55

Oh, I don't know. I have no idea. The question I was going towards though is the…(Jared chuckles) I have no idea because I'm using utopia in a bad way because I'm not good at segues. So if I'm…here we go, I'm gonna call utopia the kingdom of heaven.

Jared 41:14

Okay

Seth Price 41:15

So is that something that Christ is pulling us towards or God is sending towards us?

Jared 41:23

Oh, I think God's sending toward us for sure if we want to use that language. I mean, I really like Jesus saying the kingdom of heaven is at hand. The Kingdom is here and now. And so I'm not one for thesiology to use a not normal word.

Seth Price 41:40

How many episodes of the Bible for Normal People as of June 10 do you have like what are y'all at?

Jared 41:47

I think we're at 90.

Seth Price 41:51

That's impressive considering you do less than the summer right, don't you?

Jared 41:56

Yeah, we go every other week in the summer.

Seth Price 41:57

Yeah, that's a good idea. I should probably try that.

Jared 41:58

Yeah, in September we'll hit Episode 100.

Seth Price 42:03

What's the party going to be?

Jared 42:05

We're doing it on Genesis and it's coinciding with our relaunch of Genesis For Normal People the book.

Seth Price 42:11

Is there new stuff?

Jared 42:13

Yeah, we're doing a second edition. It's slightly altered. But it's also starting a series of books that we want to publish in that for normal people tent.

Seth Price 42:22

What does that look like?

Jared 42:24

So Genesis For Normal People is like a 90 page overview, with a lot of sarcasm and snark about what Genesis is about and what it's not about. And then we hope to publish soon thereafter, probably the next year Exodus for Normal People. So Pete will be writing that one.

Seth Price 42:44

Will you go through the whole Bible, all the way to revelation?

Jared 42:45

Well, yeah, until we get tired and don't want to do it anymore. Yeah.

Seth Price 42:51

(laughs)

That's fair. Um, what has been the biggest change for you? You know, this many episodes in so like, I don't, and I don't mean So I feel like people that run podcasts can hear it on the people like, You're much better on the mic. You say less ummms. I can tell you, there's things that when you have to edit when you're like, oh, we're all getting better. Because it is hard to have a conversation with yourself. I mean, I can see you. But there's limited amount of FaceTime-ibility to have a genuine, you know what I mean? It's hard to do that. So what has been the biggest thing for you, though, personally, that you're spiritually or whatever that you're like, Yeah, because I'm doing this on a repetitive basis it's causing me to engage in new ideas, and it's changed this. Like, what would that be for you?

Jared 43:35

Yeah, it's not changed my ideas. Again, I've been always very good at engaging with ideas. So my concepts are still pretty constant in terms of how I see the world. I think what's changed for me, is the need to just be human and humanize this whole endeavor. I have a tendency to live in my head and just the amount of pastoral work, I think I underestimated the amount of pastoral work that's involved with doing the Bible for Normal People. Because they're just a lot of people. And I say this a lot. And I would say if it hasn't changed it, but it's definitely cemented that. I feel like most people don't need supporting arguments they need community. They need a place where they're not feeling so dang alone. Because usually once you change your mind about the Bible, you've essentially isolated yourself from your family, friends and community. And that is such a lonely place to be. So just the humanization of that have not like I can be a bit of a trailblazer and a pioneer because I'm an eight on the Enneagram and I just will burn everything down. And and I'm fine with that. But I recognize like, there are a lot of people who are don't know what they're getting into until it's too late. And just out of sincere questions that they have, end up losing all kinds of relationships and that I'm not okay with. So yeah, that's been more of my passion, I think in this last year is how to come back around with people not get too far ahead and say, hey, it's okay. Like, there are a lot of us here. You thought you were going into the desert, between, you know, you were getting kicked out of Egypt. You thought there was going to be a promised land, but you didn't realize there's 40 years of desert wandering, and helping them see like, well, this is more of a Burning Man. Really there's a lot of us out here, and it's pretty great.

Seth Price 45:29

Yeah, I would argue it is pretty great. And I agree about community. I've told many people often that I do as much almost like “church”, in the community surrounding the show than I do sometimes at church. Which I know a lot of people at my church will listen and I don't mean that as a as an insult in any way, shape, or form. This will be my last question, and then we'll let you plug the places. So who's more snarky you or Pete?

Jared 45:58

Well, Pete would argue that he is so I’ll let him have that one.

Seth Price 46:00

Oh, that's sweet of you. So I asked him being that I've had you and then I had him and I've had you again. I said, does that make me a God ordained podcast on the internet? To which he laughed and said, “That's not up to me, that's up to Jared” believe that's what he said. And so since I had Jared, does that make me a God ordained podcast on the internet?

Jared 46:23

Well, I think you know, we have these little cards, like when you go to a coffee shop, and you have to get ten, you know, 10 holes punched in your card. But you've had me on twice and Pete wants I think you have to get 10 or you can be ordained.

Seth Price 46:37

Is it just the two of you? Because that's gonna take some time. Yeah, that's gonna take some time.

Jared 46:40

Yeah, I mean, you have to earn it. I mean these aren’t gold stars here. God ordained podcast!

Seth Price 46:50

(both laught)

That's perfect. I'm gonna send you my I'm gonna get a card in the mail. Jared. I'm gonna punch it myself. It's fine. That should be something that you put on your Patreon. Like, send people anyway. Where do people, obviously the Bible for normal people, for some reason is that Pete Enns’ website. I feel like y'all are dropping the ball there. But that's not my business. So we send people to place where they should go that you engage with you, the podcast, check out stuff. When does your book coming out?

Jared 47:22

Next year. So it'll be it'll be a while until you can get you can invite me on next next summer. Okay, that'll be that'll be another punch in your card.

Seth Price 47:34

Yeah. And that'll put me four, not even halfway.

Jared 47:38

Yeah, so no, I mean, there's a lot of reasons why we do that. But yeah, you can go to the Biblefornormalpeople.com/podcast if you want to go straight to the podcast. But overall, I mean, I think that this is a this is a shameless self plug, for sure. But it's also where we we interact the most with people and that's on Patreon. So patreon.com/theBiblefornormalpeople. We do book studies. So we just did Joel Baden on historical David. And it just like, blew people's minds, including mine at some points. I was like, Oh, yeah, I went to seminary. I didn't learn that. Okay. So we yeah, we ruined David for people. And we're about to start Luke Timothy Johnson's the real, real Jesus, historical Jesus, something like that.

Seth Price 48:24

The really historical Jesus.

Jared 48:27

The really, really historical Jesus. So, but yeah, we do book studies. And we have a slack group with about, I don't know, four or 500 people on there that are just like chatting away all the time, about the Bible and all kinds of stuff. So yeah, we'd like to jump in there. And, you know, we post every week different videos, we call it our “rantings for normal people”. So check it out.

Seth Price 48:48

Cool. Fantastic. Well, those links will be in the show notes. Jared, thank you again, happy to get my third star. And I genuinely do hope to do it again. Thank you for suffering sideways in your car.

Jared 49:07

(laughs)

This is my studio here! Don’t give away my secrets here.

Seth Price 49:09

But thank you again for coming on man. I really appreciate it.

Jared 49:12

Absolutely

Seth Price 49:33

Thank you so much for being here. Thank you for listening. Please remember to rate and review this show. Share it with your friends. I'd love to hear your feedback at Can I Say This At Church calm, just hit the contact button there.

Follow the show on Facebook and Twitter and let me know what you think their today's music is used with permission from Daniel Callahan. His stuff is great and you'll find links to him in the show notes and the tracks today on the Can I Say This At Church. Spotify playlist. talk to y'all next week. I hope you're very blessed.

Bibliotheca and Biblical Narrative with Adam Lewis Greene / Transcript

Note: Can I Say This at Church is produced for audio listening. If able, I strongly encourage you to listen to the audio, which has inflection, emotion, sarcasm where applicable, and emphasis for points that may not come across well in written word. This transcript is generated using a combination of my ears and software, and may contain errors. Please check the episode for clarity before quoting in print.

Back to the Audio Episode


Seth Price 0:00

What's happening? How are we doing before the regular show, so a minute of your time, in a few weeks, two or three weeks, you will hear an episode that I did with Adam Lewis Greene, who is the person behind Bibliotheca, which is a different version of the Bible. You'll find links to that in this episode, show notes. That's at bibliotheca.co. But I would encourage you to do that, because you'll want to know what the giveaway is. So in that conversation, and throughout the organization of it Adam had said, let's give one of these away to a listener of the show. And that's a big deal like A: it's an expensive version of the Bible of a B: it's beautiful. And C: it has become one of my favorite versions of the Bible, because I see things that I don't normally see that way because the verses in the in the chapters are just gone. So it's like I'm reading without interruption. And I'm not explaining that well, but you'll see what I mean. So here's kind of the rules for entry beginning with this episode and the next two. And so that third episode will be Adam Lewis Greene’s every time that you either rate and review the show on iTunes during this time period, or pod bean, or anywhere else that you do. And I don't know how I'll keep track of those, because I don't get alerted to those. So just let me know that you did that. Every time that you do that, I'm going to go ahead and put your name in the hat for the drawing. The easier way though, and I think the way that most of you will do it is to just share this episode or the next few. And so for those of you that already shared the episodes, congratulations, your name is going to be entered in the hat easily. But for those that don't normally share the show with others, just share the show, tag the podcast, you know, either on Facebook or Twitter, when you share it. And every time that that happens, I'm going to enter that name into a hat for the drawing. And so I'm really excited to see what happens I'm excited to see where it goes. So here we go into that begin regular episode.

Adam Lewis Greene 1:44

The thing about the Hebrew Bible, when held up next to the New Testament, I think most scholars of the original languages would agree that the Hebrew Bible is sort of, generally speaking, there's a level of artistry in the Hebrew Bible that is rarely if ever reached in the New Testament. So that the result is then that the Hebrew Bible, good literal translation of the Hebrew Bible will have what Robert Alter I think he calls a grand simplicity.

Seth Price 2:41

How are we doing? Welcome to the show. I'm Seth your host. Before we get started, remember to rate and review this show on iTunes especially, or podbean, wherever you listen to shows at. Especially because this one will enter you into the drawing for Bibliotheca or you can share this episode or Any of the past two episodes starting with Darren Calhoun or Brandan Robertson to also be entered, so get after it. You will learn in today's episode, not specifically about Bibliotheca because that's been done, you can go to the website at Bibliotheca.co to learn all that that is easy enough to find. I was more interested in talking to Adam about the heart behind it, why would drive someone to come and want to approach the Bible in a new way. And I will tell you personally, and I've said this before, his version of the Bible really has impacted my faith these past few years. It's one of my favorite things on my bookshelf, and it's literally sitting here as I interview every single guest that's ever been on this show. And if memory serves, you'll hear that in this interview. So I really hope that you enjoy this conversation with Adam Lewis green about the Bible as literature and so many other things. And so here we go. Let's do it.

Seth Price 4:06

The Adam Lewis Greene, and I like the title there because it feels good. I like to keep things loose. So Adam Lewis Greene, welcome to the show, man! I'm excited to have you. And I'm thankful to have you because I know we've been working on this for some time. And if I'm honest, Adam, at the beginning of it, when I shot an email, I was like, I'll send this off, and it will go to some marketing PR director. And I won't hear back. Because usually, that's what happens. Like I have to track people down at a very local level, usually. But that is not the case. I think that probably goes to you. And so thank you for your willingness. And welcome to the show, man.

Adam Lewis Greene 4:36

Yes, thank you so much for having me. It's an honor to be invited to chat with you, and Yyes, we are, when I say “we”, it sounds like I'm talking about a company. But I'm really talking about me and my wife. So just if you send an email, it's gonna get to one of us.

Seth Price 4:53

Yeah, I am. Someone asked me the other day, they're like you need like a personal assistant. I was like, why? And I'm like, well, because I'm pretty sure you're the editor, producer music, procure email licenses, all the stuff. I'm like, yeah. Plus a dad and the actual job that keeps my belly full. It's just it is a lot. It's a lot. I'm sure what I do is in no way the same scale at what you do. But it's still a lot.

Adam Lewis Greene 5:17

No, I think it absolutely is. I think it is. I think what you do is the same skill.

Seth Price 5:27

There are worse hobbies I could have though.

Adam Lewis Greene 5:28

Yeah, definitely worse it is. And then maybe someday this will be your main job if you keep at it.

Your stuff is really clean. I mean, it sounds great. It looks great. Your website's great. And you've got a clear message. I think, you know, how long have you been doing this?

Seth Price 5:41

I started the podcast; and by started I like made like a two minute Hey, I'm gonna do this and I put it out into the world to keep myself accountable, in November 2017. I think the actual first episode was like, middle of December of 2017.

Adam Lewis Greene 6:00

So not long.

Seth Price 6:02

But every episode I learned something new. Like I literally had no idea. I'm like, well Garageband is on this computer. How do I record that? Yeah, I bought a cheap $30 mic from Amazon and I should probably upgrade this. That's the goal eventually. But I didn't realize how expensive putting things on the internet can be if people begin to listen to it because you have to pay for that bandwidth.

Adam Lewis Green 6:25

Oh, yeah, interesting.

Seth Price 6:27

Yeah, I didn't realize which I guess is a good it's a good problem, but it's a problem.

Adam Lewis Greene 6:32

Yeah, you gotta pay for everything. The equivalent of that in my life is cardboard boxes. It's like the more I ship the more cardboard boxes I gotta buy.

Seth Price 6:42

Yeah, you just have a pallet in the garage.

Adam Lewis Greene 6:45

Yes, hundreds of them.

Seth Price 6:46

Well, tell me a bit about you not so much about Bibliotheca but you. Like what made you the version of I'm gonna say Christian, and if I'm wrong in that I would think you'd have to be to do what you've done. Am I wrong and saying that?

Adam Lewis Greene 7:00

We’ll get there. (laughter)

Seth Price 7:02

Perfect. We did it.

But what has formed you into the you know, husband, father, publisher that you are today? Like, what are those big milestones there?

Adam Lewis Greene 7:12

Well, I love that question. That's a good question. I've never been asked a question of that nature before when talking about this project; or at least not that specific.

I think, I mean, that's really hard to pin down. And (laughter) but I imagine, I don't know, I imagine our backgrounds are somewhat similar. And, you know, I was raised in the Midwest, in a very conservative Baptist home. And I was raised, I mean, in an environment where I think my parents were not quite as sold on everything but the environment I was in, my school, my church was a very legalistic, dogmatic, environment. And so that then I think results in a certain seriousness that I just kind of I have toward my faith and my beliefs because, you know, the wages of sin is death, if you think about it. So, I was worried and scared for a long time, but I'm grateful in some ways, even though I, you know, I would never subject my kids to that kind of upbringing. Now, I'm grateful in some way is that it that it caused me to take my beliefs and my thinking seriously.

So, although, I don't think that's always a result. You know, I think it that plays out in different ways where it can like have serious psychological consequences in that kind of legalistic, dogmatic environment. And so now it's like trying to figure out how to raise my kids in an environment where it's like, I'm not holding the fear of hell over their heads. And I'm not telling them there's somebody watching their every move, and they can't slip up and you better rededicate your life if you feel weird today.

Seth Price 9:09

Every three weeks.

Adam Lewis Greene 9:10

(laughs)

Yeah, yeah. So my kids are too young for that right now; actually in the environment that I was in, they wouldn't be too young, you’d start right away just as soon as they can understand words you start inundating them with that kind of fearful language. But I am also grateful for it. So it's a mixed bag there with my upbringing, because eventually, like I said, that that leads to, I think, you either just sort of throw everything out and you say, forget this, I'm done. Or you say, well, let's see, what does this all really mean? Where did it come from? And what can I take away? If I bring reason to the table what can I take away with me after I've kind of held everything up to reason?

But that's sort of where I went and so like to be more specific, my whole life through college I went to private Christian school. But there was sort of always this weird tension there, especially starting in high school through college; where I just sort of saw church as being something that I was just very skeptical, very skeptical about the church and what the church was saying about the Bible, in particular. And, how it was educating its members and attendees about what the Bible was. So I was skeptical, but I didn't really know why. Thankfully, I had some really great professors in college who kind of broke with the traditions of the college actually, and gave me some really honest material to look at and we had some really good conversations about, what is the Old Testament? How did it come into being? And what is the Bible in general? What have people been saying about the Bible forever and not just the last 150 years, which is all you get if you're a conservative, Protestant Christian in the Midwest, is just like what have we been saying the last 150 years about it.

But it's framed as what have we been saying about the Bible since the Garden of Eden? Because that's when, you know, that's like the deception that we have access to the original way of seeing things as as conservative Protestant Christians. So anyway, I don't know if you can tell like what I said when I started is it's hard to pin down. I don't know. But I think for me, I also had a very, I had very great parents, not that they were infallible, at all, by any stretch, but it was this kind of at the end of the day I could trust that they loved me and supported me. You know, that's like a big thing in my life. So I felt, despite the fact that my community was kind of a scary thing, and I didn't necessarily feel safe there. I felt like I could ask questions because I had that safety net of my parents, like, I don't think that they're gonna reject me for being skeptical of these things.

So is a huge, huge factor. Yeah. And then, you know, now I am whatever I am. And it's a weird kind of thing where, yeah, the Bible is obviously very important to me. And I think I've changed even since we launched the campaign in 2014, which is now five years ago; next month, it'll be five years, since I launched the campaign. And so, you know, I've continued to read theology and philosophy and those things that are interesting to me. And, you know, I feel very close to the Bible because it was always around and I and it is definitely the central text of my life if I had to choose one. And I still love it and I still read it and study it.

Seth Price 12:58

What college was that because most professors, well depends on the college, they won't buck The trend because they need their tenure, or they'll be ostracized or not allowed to write or publish anymore. So what college was that?

Adam Lewis Greene 13:07

I went to a small, private Christian University in Elgin, Illinois called Judson. What started as Judson College and it ended is Judson University. They went through that transition while I was there.

Seth Price 13:21

My wife’s school just did that.

Adam Lewis Greene 13:22

Yeah, it’s kinda of just such a gimmicky thing, but it’s…

Seth Price 13:27

I think it's semantics isn't? Is it just semantics is that all that it is or is there an actual like, you know…

Adam Lewis Greene 13:32

No. There is like an accreditation system that you've got to go through. But you know, like, what isn't semantics I guess is the question. I mean, it's like, you gotta be able to say you've got these different colleges. And so basically, it's just like a restructuring. You just basically recategorize your college to make a university. So that was my understanding of anyway at the time. It was a weird environment, because it's like it was a small, private Christian school that cost too much money. So I had a huge amount of debt when I was done. So I have this weird bitterness toward that.

Seth Price 14:03

And you probably still do if you're like most hopefully you paid it off.

Adam Lewis Greene 14:09

Well, no, because maybe to get too personal here. My wife got a really good job right out of school and she helped me. She’s very generous and kind and she helped me pay it off. So but actually, that was very recent, you know, like, I'm 33 and we just very recently paid it off.

Seth Price 14:23

I’m with you so I just turned 37 and I finally paid off my student loans (in) November of last year, and it was literally for the longest time Adam, I wouldn't speak to you if your name was Sallie. Like, I just didn't like Sallie. If your name is Mae, I don't Fannie, I don't want to even…someone else can help you when you come into work. I'm not helping you because I can't stand your name. (laughter)n Yeah, and that's an over exaggeration, but that's my animosity towards the student loan system.

Adam Lewis Green 14:52

No I hear it. It's a huge burden

Seth Price 14:55

Easy question. Really easy question. When you say the Bible, because you approach the Bible differently from what I can infer Have the videos that have watched a Bibliotheca. And for just for clarification purposes, I can distinctly remember being on summer vacation at Myrtle Beach at my wife's grandparents house when I saw, someone sent me a message, about Bibliotheca on the Kickstarter. And so yeah, I think I was like the 15th or 20th or something like that backer and was like “Oh, this looks good”.

Adam Lewis Greene 15:20

Oh, wow! Yeah, it's so nice to meet you. Yeah, that's amazing. ,

Seth Price 15:23

Yeah, well at the time, I also didn't make much money. So back in the day, like it was a lot less expensive to get it on Kickstarter than it is today. So I see people buying it now and I'm like, whew….Yeah, I like to tell people that I have one but I didn't pay that much for it. Although I went with I went with that cardboard slip. I should have went with the Walnut or Mahogany or whatever the wood is. But um,

Adam Lewis Greene 15:45

They're still around. They're still around.

Seth Price 15:47

So I can distinctly remember reading it and being like, I was like, man this is a fresh take. But I'm curious as to…so for you…what is that? Like, what is the Bible? Like when I say or when you say the Bible what do you mean “the Bible”? Because I say that for a couple of reasons. A: you messed with the order, which I like. B: it's formatted entirely different. And I am curious as to why formatting matters for how we read the Bible. Like why in our possibly in our brain or why that even matters? But just what is the Bible? Because for different sects of our faith, that's a different answer entirely.

Adam Lewis Greene 16:24

Yeah. I mean, it's a good question that I am still wrestling with. I don't know that I have a clear answer on that. I think, for me, that's part of it. It's like you'll notice in the, in the language of the videos and on the website, I prefer to refer to it as Biblical literature or the Biblical library. And I chose an Bibliotheca for a reason to imply that it is a library.

And, you know, I mean, I think I'll try to put it simply, and by the way, these aren't my views. You know I'm just regurgitating what I read. I'm a lay theologian, you know. I don't….

Seth Price 17:04

Welcome to the club.

Adam Lewis Greene 17:07

So I'm just reading books and then reframing things in like a really primitive way, probably is embarrassing that the people who originally wrote down the brilliant ideas. But I think that the Bible is a collection of literature that has been preserved by communities throughout history. And it's varied in the way that it's ordered, and even what's included. It's hard for me to see it as is anything beyond. I'm trying to figure out how to put this, it's hard for me to see it as anything beyond human. I think it's a very human collection of literature.

And that doesn't mean it's not divine. I don't think that. But I think at the same time, you have to go into questions like what does the term “Word of God” mean or inspired and things like that? And, you know, I'll leave that to the theologians; you can go read books about that. I could maybe recommend a couple that I like.

Seth Price 18:08

Who are they?

Adam Lewis Green 18:10

Well, for me, I think the biggest; and what's interesting is he doesn't really talk that much about the religious significance of the Bible as much as he just talks about the form of the literature of the Bible, which is Robert Alter. Robert Alter (in) every single interview I've done every time somebody asked me who's inspired me the most when it comes to the Bible, or who's been the most influential thinker when it comes to the Bible. I always say Robert Alter.

Seth Price 18:36

That name is familiar. Didn't he just retranslate the Old Testament like recently, or something similar?

Adam Lewis Greene 18:42

Just finished. He just finished but he's been working on it for I think 20 plus years.

Seth Price 18:47

Yeah, I remember clicking the link and it taking me to the publisher and it was like $80 or $100 only that but it was it looked the cover and everything look beautiful, but I was like well, okay, I have many copies of the Old Testament.

Adam Lewis Greene 19:01

It’s nice. You got to get his because his is better.

Seth Price 19:04

Yeah. So how does his approach change the way that you see Scripture then?

Adam Lewis Greene 19:09

Well, I think what he does, he basically wants you to see the Bible for how it was made. So I think before his retranslation, I shouldn’t say retranslation everything's a retranslation. Before his translation of the Hebrew Bible, which is accompanied by ample amounts of commentary, by the way, very good commentary. Before that his probably his most well known book was The Art of Biblical Narrative, is his most well known book that deals with the Bible; The Art of Biblical Narrative. And then he wrote one after that called The Art of Biblical Poetry, and he basically is talking about the literary devices employed by the biblical writers and redactors. And so he is getting real specific with things like you know, symbols that are carried throughout say the Joseph narrative, or the use of repetition, or how those types of devices when they're employed actually contribute meaning to the text. So I'm trying to think of an example; or like how syntax is important and how maintaining even the, what's the word I'm looking for…maintaining basically, the idiom of the ancient languages is actually beneficial in understanding its intended meaning.

So the translations are, sometimes they read very much like the King James Version, he admires the King James Version a lot. He's a Jewish scholar. So he only deals with the Old Testament or the Hebrew Bible. And he's basically saying, this is my summary. In a nutshell I don't think he's ever said this explicitly. But here's what I would say based on what Robert Alter has written. I would say that we as a culture have become obsessed with extracting theology, or theological truths-doctrine, from the Bible to the extent that we now translate it to that end.

Seth Price 21:11

Yeah, we're chasing our own tail.

Adam Lewis Greene 21:14

Yes. So now it's like if you're gonna read the ESV, you're getting sort of the complementarian, Protestant, interpretation of the Bible. You're not actually getting a translation of the Bible. Sometimes you are but a lot of times in those kind of tricky places where things are not buttoned up nice and neat, you'll get a translation that kind of implies that they are and that favors their their interpretation. And Robert Alter is basically saying, let's confront the text honestly. Let's let it be mysterious sometimes, because it really just is and honestly, there are a lot of holes in our understanding of ancient Hebrew. So let's let's not shy away from that, you have to be really honest about that and then we can start having better conversations.

I mean, it's really just literary criticism. I mean, he started as a literary critic of modern literature, and then later fell into biblical criticism and has become a real heavy hitter in that realm. And I love his work. I love his writing in general, not just his translation, but his writing itself is just very clear and intelligent. It's not overly wordy. And it's great for the layman like me and you.

Seth Price 22:33

This is an ignorant question with his re translation of the Old Testament or the Hebrew Bible be similar to the way that David Bentley Hart has done the new? Like his most current New Testament translation is like literally, almost broken sentences on purpose. Like I'm trying to do exactly what the word meant, without putting your bias on top of it, but I don't know that may be an ignorant question, because I haven’t read either one of those. So, that's me understanding what I've read of Bentley’s.

Adam Lewis Greene 23:07

I think yes. The difference though is that, Robert Alter, the thing about the Hebrew Bible, when held up next to the New Testament, I think most scholars of the original languages would agree that the Hebrew Bible is sort of, generally speaking that there's a level of artistry in the Hebrew Bible that is rarely if ever reached in the New Testament. So that the result is then that the Hebrew Bible, good literal translation of the Hebrew Bible, will have what Robert Alter I think he calls “a grand simplicity”.

And so it's sort of this very, very simple straightforward—there's a lot of “ands” you know, it's just everything is connected by “ands”. You’d think the King James is the Jacobean Being English imposed upon the Hebrew Bible, but in a lot of ways, actually, the King James Bible, and the ESV, which is what we based our revision on the American Standard Version, which is a revision of the King James Version. That might be an edit right there. You just cut that out (laughter from both)

Seth Price 24:21

Well, now it has to stay.

Adam Lewis Greene 24:23

But the King James version is actually in many ways a kind of Hebrewized English, if you will. So like Tyndale did the same thing before the King James Bible. You know, his project of translation that he was killed for. He made the English of the New Testament, more like Greek than English was at the time and he made the English of the Hebrew Bible more like Hebrew then spoken English was at the time.

So Robert Alter is doing that he's doing a similar thing. Ahe kind of makes the divide between Pre war and post war translations. So after the war, you have the most obvious example is the 1952 Revised Standard Version.

Seth Price 25:09

You are talking about from World War Two?

Adam Lewis Greene 25:11

Post World War Two. Yep.

So the 1952 Revised Standard Version is purportedly, a revision of the ASV but the translation philosophy, there is a huge divergence from the Tyndale, King James, ASV, translation philosophy it becomes suddenly very explanatory. Which is another thing Robert also talks about, he calls it the “heresy of explanation”. He says,

to translate language is to move it from one language into another, but what we've done with post war translations is to the reader.

Seth Price 25:48

Yeah. I'm gonna email Robert today because that's fascinating.

(Music)

So you were very intentional, and I don't necessarily want to talk about how beautifully binded and all of the stuff that goes into publishing the book, because although that's fascinating, you have spoken about that elsewhere, if you Google it people can find it. There's videos on it. The Kickstarter videos, the website, like a lot of that is really well laid out with pictures at the same time. And I think for explaining that process, you kind of need to see what you're talking about if you don't have a basis in publishing. Because I know I didn't, although I can appreciate it now that I have, you know, some well-bound books, and some that are not like I have a lot of galley copies of books now. And those are definitely not well bound.

What is the purpose of form if we're going to approach the Bible as a narrative form? Because you've been very intentional in the way that you have structured the text. I mean, there's no chapter there's no verses. There's nothing and I know how that's impacted me. And we can talk about that. Although I'd rather say that if we have time. But why do you think form matters as we engage in an honest or intentional reading, of biblical narrative?

Adam Lewis Greene 27:19

Well, I think that for humans form has has mattered, I'm tempted to say has always mattered. Definitely, that's true. But we know for sure that form has mattered for a really long time. And I think that's an interesting kind of a result of the Reformation, and the iconoclasts, and even just the Enlightenment has been to hyper intellectualize things, I think. I guess what I'm saying is the written word has always, form, has always been an important part of that. Even if you look at the, the Isaiah scroll, which is the oldest extant manuscripts of a full book of the Bible that we that we have access to. That is…it's a beautiful scroll, I mean, the the spacing, and the letter forms are beautiful. In other words, that the manuscript is inclined to the reader, you know, so you're inviting the reader to read this thing. It's meant to be read. It is poetry or narrative or law or whatever it may be. The end goal is for someone to sit down and read it, whether it be to themselves out loud. I think that mattered all the way through history. It still matters today. So like, it's not uncommon to see, if you go to a used bookstore, and go find a classic….find the Divine Comedy or Homers work and you'll see or Shakespeare's work and you'll see beautiful editions of these books.

Even even philosophers, like Nietzsche, you'll find beautiful editions of their work, although I don't find enough of those. Somehow the Bible kind of went through a different history where for a long time it was treated as the…it would end up being the most beautiful book. You know, it would be the most beautifully decorated and carefully made physical object that there was for a long time, out of reverence for its importance, obviously. But then the Reformation came along and it became more about like I said, before extracting truths and facts, you might say empirical facts, even though they're not empirical facts. But the result then, is that you start treating the Bible like a utilitarian object, which it can be used that way certainly. And if you're a pastor and you need your congregation to bring their Bibles to church every Sunday so you can Make them flip around from from verse to verse. If that's what you need, then you need a reference Bible that will suit that need.

But I think what's interesting is I've read a lot of people obviously comments and reviews and things like that about Bibliotheca. And I think one thing that people say a lot over and over again, is, “I love this as like my everyday reader”, or something along those lines. But you know, “it's not good for study”. And I would say, you know, actually just reading something straight through is kind of the first step of study. And so it's actually excellent for study.

So it's still a utilitarian object in that it's enabling you I think, in a way that traditional reference Bibles with two columns on each page and numbers everywhere, it's enabling you to engage with the text in a way that those books for many people it hinders their experience. Because, you know, we know that that is not the most comfortable way to read a text.

You know, there are rules of typography and and book design that have developed over the centuries that we pretty well agree upon, like, hey, yeah, this looks nice. And I can sit down and read it for a while, and you don't think about a dictionary or an encyclopedia in that way. And yet, that is exactly what a traditional reference Bible looks like. It looks like something that is not meant to be read for an extended period of time.

So I simply wanted to reintroduce this type of form to the biblical library, and I say, reintroduce because it really is just a reversion to the, the, the old sort of reverence and beauty that would be applied to the Biblical texts throughout history.

So I mean, that was the way it looked for I mean, if you look at the Isaiah scroll, anybody who's listening if you just Google the Isaiah scroll, and then you look at a page of Bibliotheca, it's like it's the same thing. We're talking about 3000 years apart. You know that was my main inspiration that page layout, the Isaiah scroll. It's just simple and elegant and spacious. And it's just the text, you know. And I could have gone even further with it by separating each book out on its own or separating, you know, the three Isaiah’s from each other, etc, etc. But because, you know, scrolls couldn't contain this much text. But I think just separating it into volumes, obviously, was necessary if I wanted to use nicer, thicker. paper. But it's also sort of a symbol or signpost that, hey, this is a library. This is a collection of texts. And it deserves our attention in a different way than this sort of lab table, dissecting, approach that we've taken into it for the last several hundred years.

Seth Price 32:48

By the time this airs it I don't know where it will be in there. But there's a handful of us that are going through a book by Alexander Shaia. We're going through the Gospel of Mark right now and I have stopped reading the Gospel of Mark out of my traditional Bibles, and I started reading it as I'm going through leading this small study on this book, out of yours. And what I'm finding is where I used to prooftext things in like, you know, turn the mark, or Matthew 12, verse, whatever, I can't do that when I do it this way. And it's forcing me when I try to talk about Scripture to tell a bigger story, when I'm talking about something that was said. Like in the past, I would be like, Tom Brady had 76 fantasy football numbers. And now I can't talk about it without talking about the whole team. And that's a really bad metaphor. That's a really bad metaphor, but I hope you understand what I'm trying to say. Yeah, it forces me to wrestle with Scripture in a way that I would argue that it's just as much study because I can easily memorize, I can remember like parts of To Kill a Mockingbird and that type of stuff. Because paragraphs were formative. Like you'd read it you're like, “Oh, my gosh”, that's, you remember parts of Lord of the Rings are parts of other stories that are well told that matter. You remember them, it doesn't matter how it was formatted on the page, but it's hard to reference back to.

But I like that around. Like, I feel like, I'm pretty sure mark is on page like 98 or 86 or something like that, like, that's about Mark 6 somewhere in this vicinity.

Adam Lewis Greene 34:13

So I mean, there's also a different way of reading now than there was in antiquity. I mean, who are the greatest expositors of Scripture of all time? I mean most of them. were not using a reference Bible. You know, St. Augustine, Maimonides you know, they, they knew the text because they had to, and that was the way that they read it. They were just constantly reading it straight through. And I'm sure they had little marked up manuscripts or whatever but there's a certain intimacy that I think is accomplished when you cut off some of these interruptions, like cross references or footnotes and things like that. Obviously, those are good tools to have. It's great that we have those things I would never argue against that but it is a different kind of space to enter into with the text. I think entirely different. It has the potential, maybe not for everyone. Maybe some people aren't bothered by the reference Bible. Maybe they can sort of see through that and ignore all the distractions. But for me, it really was about creating the space that I wanted to read the text within.

Seth Price 35:20

I would argue, for people that haven't read a Bible formatted (this way) is yours the only Bible formatted this way?

Adam Lewis Greene 35:26

No. There are others. There are others now actually. I'm not gonna advertise for them. There are others now.

Seth Price 35:33

I would argue if you've never read the Bible in a different format, much like you don't know what cables like if you grew up on rabbit ears and rabbit ears are just fine because they've always been fine. But once you have cable, you can see the differences and there's nothing against rabbit ears. And I'm probably dating myself a bit. (Laughter) There's nothing against that format, but there's other formats and they have their own function and form. One is more quickly able to navigate to number 206 you know, ESPN or whatever, and you can quickly get to where you need to be. And the other requires nuance and requires you to adjust the antenna. Let's call that prayer. Like, it's gonna require more intention to get the signal inputs. It requires more time and more patience, another bad metaphor. So there we go.

Adam Lewis Greene 36:19

You got it. I think that's a good metaphor, because for at least for people who are of our age and older.

Seth Price 36:25

Yeah, yeah, well, yeah. Although I don't know, when rabbit ears stopped. So, I'm curious. And this would be a deeply personal question. I'd like to wrap up with this one, before we plug what you're doing now, as you had to wrestle through the text, and you know, you're redoing it. And I remember seeing like the product update saying, you know, we had to get other people that know more about this text than than I do. Because if we're going to retranslate it like the commas matter. The periods matter, the syntax matters. And so what are some of those things that as you were going through it, you're like, you know, personally like, Okay, well, we got to reprint it this way. But now that I see that like, I can't unsee that. And then it changes the story of some of these other things like you like, Oh my god, nobody ever told me this. I didn't know this, and scholars probably knew it. But you're like, Oh, I can't, that genie is never going back in the bottle.

Adam Lewis Greene 37:13

Yeah, I think, well, a lot of it is that initially we set out with a team of copy editors, right. And we spent a long time we worked with a very experienced proofreading company, Peachtree Editorial, they've done a lot of Bibles, they and my copy chief, a guy named Will Palmer, he, they, and I all worked together for months to create a style guide where we decided okay, we're looking at the Jacobean English and the commas and the semi-colons and usage in ASV that needs to get updated.

And so those things you come across all sorts of situations and so the style guide begins to get really, really long. And then we gave the style guide to a team of copy editors, and they start applying it to the text and you start to see (that) there are a lot of decisions that need to be made like a semi colon versus a comma versus no comma. I mean, it can change things.

And then the other thing was without footnotes is there's a little bit of a weakness there. Because the ASV very often has this like most reference Bibles, they have in the margins like a more literal rendering of the Hebrew. And a lot of times, I really just wanted to put those in the main text, because they are so much more visceral and human.

So like, for example, oftentimes, throughout the Hebrew Bible, a prophet-say Moses-will say something and at the end of what they've said, it'll say, you know, thus says Yahweh by the hand of Moses. But a lot of times the translators took out “the hand of”. It'll say “this says Yahweh by Moses”, or something like that. And I thought, well, why would we take out by the hand of Moses? You know, I mean, that's just a great bodily image. And that's the way that the Hebrew saw the world. So why would we take that out? Or translating things like, instead of center, translated as translating it as I or something like that. Or in Daniel, there was an example, like, we're talking about Mordecai being hung on a gallows when the literal is “tree” so why not just give me the more concrete translation, you know? And so I'm seeing that in the margins (and) I'm thinking well, I want to incorporate these (and) that's like a more intense editorial change than just switching around commas and eliminating Jacobean English. But if I'm going to do that, I need to run it by people who know the Hebrew and then the Greek and Aramaic. So, we then came to need to have scholars to read through the text, make suggestions, point out errors, things like that, you know. So they suggested a lot of clarifications or things that, you know, we've come a long way in 120 years with the original languages. So they were able to help with that process, for sure. And it gave me a sense of peace. You know, I was very anxious about the editorial process until I finally made the decision, which was a financial decision, like, do we have enough money to pay these guys to spend the time to do this?

Seth Price 40:30

Yeah, they're not gonna volunteer.

Adam Lewis Greene 40:33

Yeah. And so it was a considerable chunk of money, but I think it gives the final product a sort of legitimacy that it wouldn't otherwise have had.

But I think the other thing too, is like, I would notice things that maybe weren't even noted in the ASV and I would say like well what do you think of this? I'd be able to run it by scholars. So like, for example, 2 Timothy 3:16 is the “all Scripture is God breathed”.

Seth Price 41:02

That's the inerrancy clause.

Adam Lewis Greene 41:04

Right. So in basically every Bible, you're going to get that traditional translation, “All scripture is God breathed and useful for..,” etc, etc. But in ASV, the ASV is sort of infamously known for translating it differently. And it says something like,

all Scripture that is God breathed is useful for…

and if you look at the original Greek, there are problems there. The Greek is complicated. And so you can Google it, or you can go look at Peter Enns. But that translation is strange and contested. So I was able to ask the scholars and was able to say, Okay, well, what do you think of this translation? Is it as ridiculous as everybody says it is?

And I asked David Desilva, who is a professor of New Testament at Ashland Theological Seminary, and he said, it's actually a perfectly viable translation. And I was suggest you keep it because it's, you know, because it's different. And because it adds a dimension to the text, it confronts the reader with another possibility that is actually perfectly viable if you look at the original Greek. So those are examples of things where the help of scholars and editors was a huge help.

And I think the resulting translation, you know, like I chose to use the ASV and update it, because there was no other full translation of the Bible that included the Hebrew Bible, the Apocrypha, the New Testament, that sort of adhered to Robert Alters philosophy of translation. So the ASV was sort of the closest thing I could find, the closest and most recent thing, that falls somewhat in line with his translation philosophy. It's not perfect, but then I was sort of able to bring, with our rules and with the scholars, I was sort of able to bring his approach a little bit more into focus with our revision, which is the American Literary Version. So yeah, and there are a lot of examples, but it's like it'll get old fast.

Seth Price 43:04

I like it. So you probably heard me pulling out books. I was looking for my copy of the New Testament, but that's the one that's at work because I was reading it yesterday. You probably hear me slide them out. I'm like, I'm gonna go to 2 Timothy.

Adam Lewis Greene 43:15

Yes, Bibliotheca sliding out of a slipcase.

Seth Price 43:17

Yeah, well, yeah. Does it have a sound? You recognize the sound?

Adam Lewis Greene 43:20

Yeah, the cloth and I know the cloth.

Seth Price 43:22

Yeah. Well, so your case is actually the perfect level to get you off of the small coffee table that I use. So your version of the Bible is literally holding up every interview that I do is, like quite literally.

Adam Lewis Greene 43:40

I love that. That’s is perfect. It also works as a great stepstool everyone. I wouldn’t recommend it but you could.

Seth Price 43:46

Yeah, maybe the wood one, but I'm a big dude. And that's not gonna hold me up. Um, so there's gonna be links to Bibliotheca in the show notes and from what I understand a bulk of people like when people ask me, oftentimes people ask me or I’ll respond to people when they ask, you know, what's the best version of the Bible for people to read. And I will say, here's the two that I read. And it's usually an NRSB and then Bibliotheca and I'll pair other ones with them. But I always say, the one that you will read, and the one that you'll read often, that's the best version.

But is your revision to the ASV going to get included elsewhere? For people that only read Bible on a digital format?

Adam Lewis Greene 44:23

I do hope so.

Seth Price 44:25

Who do I have to call when? I have no c C lout but I will call.

Adam Lewis Greene 44:30

(laughs)

It’'s just like, you know, we were talking about, I think before you start recording, we were talking about how we're just trying to do everything. And you know, and it's, I think, it's just me and my wife running this business and trying to survive. So, I've got conversations started about making a digital version of the text.

Seth Price 44:53

Well it should already exist right? Because you had to submit a digital version to the printer?

Adam Lewis Greene 44:56

Right. So it's a digital version of the text, but we would have to reincorporate verse numbers, right? If we want it to be a searchable text.

Seth Price 45:06

No, no, no, no.

Adam Lewis Greene 45:07

Okay, okay, fine. Well, then it’s easy. I'll just make it available in PDF form and then there you go.

Seth Price 45:11

I like that there's no verse numbers, because that's too easy to slip back into the older way of reading it. But maybe that’s just me.

Adam Lewis Greene 45:18

But I’m just saying that if I want to make the translation. If I want to enter that world of sort of like competitive Bible translation, which I have not determined whether or not to do, then I would have to sort of reincorporate the verses and the all the proper I don't know even what you call it the code language or whatever; to make it you know, work on say, you know, all the Bible study tools com or Bible gateway.com or whenever so that it's a searchable text that you can compare with others. You know what I mean? I would like that, because I think the translation is really good. I mean, it's the ASV but in my opinion, we removed the archaicisms and we made some improvements.

Seth Price 46:04

You know what, let me rescind my “No”, because I'm thinking about it wrong. I was thinking about reading a digital version of Bibliotheca. But my question is letting people read this version of the Bible in whatever format they need to. So I'm going to rescind my no, it's not a fair No. Okay. When I was like, No, don't do it. Don't do it. Because I was thinking about it at a personal level.

Adam Lewis Greene 46:22

Well, yeah, I mean, obviously the reason I did it was was to get people this experience, right? It's not just about the format but it's also about the materials. The physical object in the way that feels and smells and yeah, and the way that it even just sits in a room when you're not using it. So it's all these things, all the parts contribute to a greater whole right. So it's that translation is one aspect of the project but the physical form, is what completes it in my opinion.

So that's why it's kind of been like it's been a backburner thing. It hasn't been a huge priority to get the translation out there. And compete with the NIV and NRSV and ESV or whatever. Because that's kind of that's not what I set out to do with this project.

Seth Price 47:08

That's a great answer. What are you doing now? What’s next for Adam Lewis Greene?

Adam Lewis Greene 47:15

Well, the most exciting bit of news that I have, well, first of all, IBibliotheca has been, you know, I don't know if you'll give like a little summary of Bibliotheca when before I start talking, or whatever, before the recording, but….

Seth Price 47:29

You don't know if I'll give a what?

Adam Lewis Greene 47:31

Are you gonna give a little summary of like, what Bibliotheca is because I just realized we haven’t really talked about what it is?

Seth Price 47:38

Well, let's do that. So I probably won't. Usually what I do is I give people a preface of, here's what you're going to hear us talk about right away they can quickly hit the eject button. Like sometimes if I'm going to deal with inerrancy, which I also could have brought up when we talk about something here, but we're going to deal with that at length and you're not comfortable with that. Just hit delete. But I can or…you can.

Adam Lewis Greene 48:01

Bibliotheca started as a Kickstarter project, wherein I attempted to raise $37,000, that was the goal on Kickstarter. And as you know, being one of the first backers it kind of went crazy. And it went viral and it ended up, the campaign ended up, raising $1.4 million in 30 days. So it was definitely scratching some kind of itch that was out there for lots of different types of people, not just Christians-and all different types of Christians as well.

And so, since then, it has sort of continued to be…it's required a lot of my focus, time, and energy.

Seth Price 48:48

You just wanted to do a one off run, right, like you wanted the Bible this way for you. And you're like, if I'm gonna do it, let's just let's just do it for a handful of other people.

Adam Lewis Greene 48:56

Exactly, exactly. Just like it was like, what's it gonna take to get maybe 500 of these made because that's about the minimum amount any serious bindery and book printer is going to consider if you want to have it professionally done on an industrial level, and so that was $37,000. That was my calculation. And that was basically at cost, which is why the Kickstarter campaign is so much cheaper than what is for sale now. Because I have to run a business, you know, like I have overhead. But it's like, with the Kickstarter, I wasn't thinking about overhead. I wasn't thinking about, you know, buying equipment and things like that.

So it's like, there was really no profit built into the Kickstarter. But luckily, we raised enough money to stay above water, we came pretty close a couple of times. But anyway, we ended up finally publishing. So the Kickstarter campaign was in 2014, we finally published it right at the end of 2016, beginning of 2017, sending it out to backers and people who pre-ordered it, and it has continued to sort of stay steady. There's been a steady flow of interest in Bibliotheca. Which I am both surprised by and grateful for.

And so that has been, you know, like I'm still a designer. Like that was the plan was to do Bibliotheca that would sort of be my weekend project. And I remain a freelance designer. But it's been more like, I do freelance design in my spare time and Bibliotheca is kind of my…that's my business. But it's turned into a publishing company, where now I am working on other projects. And the biggest news of late is that I just finally, after many, many years, actually before Bibliotheca I've been wanting to buy a Heidelberg cylinder printing press. And these are like the height of letterpress printing machine was made in the 1950s. It's like this 13,000 pound, steel monster, and I'm gonna use it to Print to print some really nice books. Hopefully, if I can figure it out. It's gonna be a lot of tinkering. A lot of trial and error, but, but I have a couple of projects in mind, like shorter works that I like to do on the printing press. And obviously have them beautifully bound, etc. But, you know, as far as details go, I don't have any to offer.

Seth Price 51:28

That's all gonna be under the Bibliotheca umbrella, or that's an entirely different entity?

Adam Lewis Greene 51:33

So now I started my business is now WritPress. So that's my company name, which again, is kind of silly, because it's really just me and my wife.

Seth Price 51:45

As, working in a bank, most businesses are you and your wife. So I meet so many business owners that there are that it's a huge business, but it's two people.

Adam Lewis Greene 51:56

Oh man. It even continues to get crazier and crazier. We've been using, this is a little bit off topic, but we've been using a fulfillment company since we launched the campaign because when we had to fulfill the first order, right…

Seth Price 52:13

Somebody has to warehouse it.

Adam Lewis Greene 52:15

Everyone who pre-ordered it, we had something like 30,000 units or something like that and 22,000 of those had to go out the door right away. Like there's no way we were going to do that ourselves. So we hired a company with a giant warehouse and we've been housing our inventory there. It was up in Pennsylvania since we launched, since we published, and our service agreement with them finally expired. So that our monthly cost to stay there on a month to month basis, just ended up being too costly.

So even the price of shipping went up and all that stuff because our initial agreement has expired. So we just recently moved all the remaining inventory, which compared to what it was is not that much, but for one person to just houses all this inventory…we just moved all of our remaining inventory from Pennsylvania, down here to North Carolina.
And, you know, I had to rent a forklift and it showed up on a 53’ truck and like me and my wife and my two little, almost four and almost two year old were there.

You know, like they were crawling in the boxes and …

Seth Price 53:27

I hope you got your kids the little airplane thing so they could direct you.

Adam Lewis Greene 53:30

(Laughter)

Yeah, they loved it, man. They love to help and yeah, like, in climbing the boxes when they're empty. And it's really like you said, it's kind of it's probably doing too much. I probably I probably should hire a couple, a couple of people to do that kind of thing. But I enjoy being a part of that process. You know, like I designed every letter in that book. You know, like I designed the typeface. I oversaw the editorial process with people who were qualified to actually carry it out. And then I, you know, typeset it, I oversaw the printing production, chose all the materials. And now just having received the inventory and overseeing that process. I just love having that perspective and knowing what it takes to do everything from from start to finish. Because I hope to be to publish more works and I want to know every step along the line and know how to do it the best way I can.

So that's where we're at now, you know, like, hopefully in 10 years, we'll look back and think remember when we unloaded all that inventory ourselves and I drove a forklift around for six hours in the hot sun.

Seth Price 54:45

So where do they go then, Adam, if they want to connect with you, they want maybe they listen to this and they're like, hey, quick question on something you said like where would you direct them to, to do any ad or data copy of obviously Bibliotheca or to keep track of Writ Press?

Adam Lewis Greene 54:58

Sure. The website is bibliotheca.co you could just you could also just probably Google Bibliotheca Adam or Bibliotheca Kickstarter, and you'd find it.

Seth Price 55:14

I will say if you just Google Bibliotheca it takes you to like an Italian website. I think like,

Adam Lewis Greene 55:18

Well, that's funny. Well, 3M has the company called Biblioteca, which is like library solutions.

Seth Price 55:25

Like it literally takes you to something like that, which is kind of related but differently related like I'm usually that's not where I wanted to go.

Adam Lewis Greene 55:33

Right. It's like the second or third one down if you google Bibliotheca we have Amazon inventory, which is like a necessary evil for me. But you know, we have competitors now who like to use our company name as a keyword on Amazon. So we have to be there. Well we “don’t have to” nobody's twisted my arm. But chose to be to be competitive and then we have a store bibliotheca.co or writpress.com, it's the same website. And if you have questions, I would say, please email us your questions. Don't necessarily expect an extraordinarily prompt response. But we will do our best to get back to you. The email is support@bibliotheca.co.

And we love questions because I know the text is not accessible in the digital realm, and people have lots of questions about how this or that was translated or how you did this or that and when we left to answer those questions, get that information out there.

Seth Price 56:41

Perfect. Well, man, I've greatly enjoyed it.

Adam Lewis Greene 56:45

Yeah, me too. I wish we could talk for for longer, but uh…

Seth Price 56:49

Well, we could always do it again. We just have to figure out a topic. So yeah, there's no rules about that. (Laughter from both)

So anyway, thank you again, so, so much, genuinely enjoyed it.

Adam Lewis Greene 56:59

You're very welcome and thank you as well for having me. I appreciate

Unknown 57:07

Today's music was provided with permission by Mountain Tops; stuff is fantastic. You'll find links to them in the show notes as well as Bibliotheca and all of the different things that we talked about in here today. I’d love your feedback and so if you have any send it to me. I can't wait to talk to you next week.

Be blessed everybody.

Inclusivity and the Gospel with Brandan Robertson / Transcript

Note: Can I Say This at Church is produced for audio listening. If able, I strongly encourage you to listen to the audio, which has inflection, emotion, sarcasm where applicable, and emphasis for points that may not come across well in written word. This transcript is generated using a combination of my ears and software, and may contain errors. Please check the episode for clarity before quoting in print.

Back to the Audio Episode


Seth Price 0:00

What's happening? How are we doing before the regular show, so a minute of your time, in a few weeks, two or three weeks, you will hear an episode that I did with Adam Lewis Greene, who is the person behind Bibliotheca, which is a different version of the Bible. You'll find links to that in this episode, show notes. That's at bibliotheca.co. But I would encourage you to do that, because you'll want to know what the giveaway is. So in that conversation, and throughout the organization of it Adam had said, let's give one of these away to a listener of the show. And that's a big deal like A: it's an expensive version of the Bible of a B: it's beautiful. And C: it has become one of my favorite versions of the Bible, because I see things that I don't normally see that way because the verses in the in the chapters are just gone. So it's like I'm reading without interruption. And I'm not explaining that well, but you'll see what I mean. So here's kind of the rules for entry beginning with this episode and the next two. And so that third episode will be Adam Lewis Greene’s every time that you either rate and review the show on iTunes during this time period, or pod bean, or anywhere else that you do. And I don't know how I'll keep track of those, because I don't get alerted to those. So just let me know that you did that. Every time that you do that, I'm going to go ahead and put your name in the hat for the drawing. The easier way though, and I think the way that most of you will do it is to just share this episode or the next few. And so for those of you that already shared the episodes, congratulations, your name is going to be entered in the hat easily. But for those that don't normally share the show with others, just share the show, tag the podcast, you know, either on Facebook or Twitter, when you share it. And every time that that happens, I'm going to enter that name into a hat for the drawing. And so I'm really excited to see what happens I'm excited to see where it goes. So here we go into that begin regular episode.

Brandan 1:44

The gospel is liberation from patriarchy. That's the entire case (that) I'm trying to make. That from Genesis to Revelation there is a progression in Scripture where patriarchy in the beginning of the Bible is the assumed ordering of creation. And that by the time we get to Revelation patriarchy has been dismantled fundamentally; and that Jesus is the linchpin in the middle of the Biblical narrative that turns the entire direction of Scripture away from patriarchy and to liberation. And so, all of that to say, if you don't understand the cultural context of Scripture, and I feel like everybody in every tradition says this, but it actually takes a lot of work to dig in and do the hard study of the Biblical culture. But unless you do that, you really don't understand the Bible.

Seth Price 2:42

Hello, my family! I'm excited that you're here. I'm gonna make this one short and sweet because to be honest, I'm biased but man I just really liked this conversation. And so I want to, I really just want to get into it. So just a couple quick announcements. Just a minute ago, you heard the giveaway (already happened), do that share the show, do what you can to get the entries. I'm really excited for that to happen. And then next week, you'll hear the interview with Adam Lewis Greene, another fantastic conversation.

It is such a privilege to be able to do this. If you follow the show on Facebook or social media or anywhere else, you'll notice that recently, I, well, I probably bit off more than I could chew. But I went ahead and made a store for the show. And so if there's anything that you want on there, shoot me an email and be like, Hey, you know what I would like I would like to have “this” and I will do what I can to make sure that it happens. So I've made a few things. It is not really my skill set. And so I am sending out ideas to people that know what they're doing, but you'll find links to that at CanISayThisAtChurch.com you just hit the button for store and get yourself whatever you like. I mostly did it because I wanted to have a few of the things there and I figured if I'm gonna go to all that trouble. Let's do it. So give me your feedback. I'd love to have it.

Today's guest is Brandan Robertson. So we welcome him back to the show. Today's guest is a returning guest. And so, gosh, 40, 50 episodes ago, maybe 40 episodes ago, I had him on, we had a conversation about what inclusion looks like. What the gospel looks like, and how that matters when we talk about homosexuality. And today, we revisit that but we really dig in deep and a couple caveats about this conversation. So I intentionally did very little editing, because there is a part about two thirds of the way that I'm uncomfortable with but I needed to stay genuine. So it is what it is. And so I don't want to belabor the point. Really excited about this conversation. Here we go with Brandan Robertson.

Brandan Robertson, welcome back to the show. You're on a list of a small list maybe eight, nine people that people that have been on twice. And so A: thank you for having faith and trust in me twice. But B: welcome back man.

Brandan 5:12

Thanks so much. It truly is an honor and I loved the last conversation and looking forward to jumping into this one.

Seth Price 5:17

Perfect. So I will skip through because if people want to, I'm sure they can go down in the show notes or on the Google and they can find you kind of talk about, you know your story that brought you to the current version of Brandan. So I will save those 10 minutes so (that) we can talk about more formative things. But I am curious what has been going on since last time we talked and the last time we talked was right after True Inclusion came out, which is a fantastic book. I like the way it talked about the Kingdom of God and what that should look like. So what has changed you know in your life, what are the big things that have happened from A to B?

Brandan 5:53

You know, not a ton has changed. True Inclusion came out in September and it is now May. And so I have this addiction of writing now. And we just put out this new books the Gospel of Inclusion a couple weeks ago. And so really this has been a year of talking about this idea of inclusion, both from a Christian theological standpoint. And I have been getting back into my second love, which is this political, social organizing field and I've had some opportunities to be bringing people together in closed door meetings and trying to see how we can work to facilitate more inclusive platforms and policies both in the church and in society as a whole. So basically, just being a pastor talking about inclusion, and seeing how we can spread this message and this ethos of inclusion further.

Seth Price 6:53

So to break apart that tangent, before we dive in. I hear you talking about you know, social and Political behind closed doors trying to make people talk about inclusivity. I feel like that has to be frustrating. Do you find it frustrating? Like, what does that actually look like? Because I think if I tried to do it, with the circles that I try to include, I feel like it would be similar to just running into a chain link fence over and over and over again.

Brandan 7:20

(Chuckle)

Totally. Well, for me, like, I feel like there is this crazy group of people that are called and anointed to use spiritual words, to do reconciliation and inclusive work. And so from very early on, I've had this bridge building spirit. And for me, I think I've done it long enough now; I've been kind of in these closed door meetings with stakeholders on the other side, so to speak, for about eight years now. And this past year has actually been really amazing. And just one example is one of the big projects I've been working on is bringing 10 evangelical mega church pastors into a room with 10 LGBT Christian leaders. And we did that a couple months ago in New York City. And the amount of change work that was done in a one day span was just incredible. That this entire group, you could literally watch hearts and minds changing before your eyes over the course of a day of spending time together. And that group is about to get back together in September, I believe. So I’ve finally gotten to a place where I think we figured out how to do this, at least with these two particular groups. And it's really encouraging and exciting to see change happening. And this, like I said, this “gospel of inclusion” spreading in ways that I hope will actually make a change in people's lives and in our world.

Seth Price 8:48

I'm going to try to overgeneralize that. So you're telling me that when people that disagree, come together in good faith, fellowship together, and try to hear the other person's point of view that people actually listen to each other‽ Oddly enough, I feel like that's what the church should be. So I'm probably over simple like, over simple, simple. I don't know what the word is. I'm over, over reducing—that is still a bad metaphor. I'm overdoing it. But I like that. I like that a lot.

I think if more people did that, there'd be a lot less shouting. And possibly, the world would actually just be better. Talk to me about so your most recent book. So the Gospel of Inclusion is, well, I wasn't really sure how big it would be. Then when I got it. I'm like, well, this is really small. And so I read it really quickly, because I just read fast and then as soon as I was done, I started again. And I know I've said on social media, like I just finished my third reading of it, partly because it's easy to read, but partly because like it's it's addictive. Dr. Gushee at the beginning basically said, you know, like, this is a text that takes a different approach. then most of the texts that you'll read, including some of your prior work, you know of, we're just going to flesh out this out really, really, really theologically. But you take a different tack. So what are you trying to get at with the Gospel of Inclusion, specifically with this piece?

Brandan 10:12

Yeah, for me, I've always hated reading really long books. And so the first part of what you asked, I kind of made this vow to never write super long books, especially long theological books. So let's see how long I can keep sticking to that. But yeah, this book was really it had a two fold purpose in the world. One, I kind of felt like I cheated in writing this book, because it was just my master's thesis essentially fleshed out a little bit more. But this is what I spent three years studying and paying lots of money to dig in and do the research on in grad school.

But it came out of this passion when I realized that as I was trying to reconcile my own faith and sexuality, I really realized that in order for me to do that it required a complete deconstruction of my evangelical faith. That it wasn't enough to change my mind about a few passages of Scripture. I actually was suspect of my inherited conservative theology.

And so I started doing this work of digging into the culture and the context through which the gospel originally emerged to try to see the nuances of what Jesus was actually getting at; who the historical person of Jesus was, and what his message actually looked like in the first century Greco-Roman world. And I realized really quickly, that it's not a stretch to say that the entire purpose of what Jesus was trying to do in his socio-political context was to tear down an oppressive system and show there's a different way of ordering the world that would lead to human flourishing. I think that's one level of the gospel definitely. And so this book, really is my attempt to in a very brief way, show how things like the crucifixion and dig into the layers of meaning that were available there to see how Jesus, even in going to the cross, was performing a symbolic action of deconstruction of patriarchy and hatred of women and that was my goal in this book. (I wanted) to bring the reader to a point where by the end of it, they at least have their appetite whetted enough to begin digging deeper into the Gospels and the message of Jesus and seeing what else might lie beneath the surface that could help us create more Just in general, a more equal church and world.

Seth Price 13:05

So the problem with that though is those books are long books when they dig into that. So I'm sitting here while you were saying that thinking, you know, right, so if you don't want to write long books, but there's enough in this master's thesis, I didn't know it was your master's thesis, but there's enough in here that I think you could flesh it out into a tome. And so all you do is you take this big, huge star on the front, and you rotate it to the left. Just change the cover so that as you line them up, you know, as you finish from, you know, Volume One to Volume 12 it's the full star on the binding of the book. So you can take that you can run with it, they're all short, but you read them together as a huge thing. There you go. I that's what I think you should do. That give it away to somebody else. I don't want it so donated to somebody that needs it let me rephrase it. I would love to have it and I do need it but give it to somebody that makes it more.

Um, so you talk a lot in the beginning. Getting in this comes up often or at least it came up a lot at the beginning of the show for me — a definition of uncleanliness. And so I hear a lot of people say, you know, it's unnatural, it's unclean. People that practice homosexual acts are just “unclean”. And you break that apart briefly at the beginning.

And so I feel like that is necessary because our fear of other is related not just to LGBTQ, it's related to anyone that doesn't look like us. And oftentimes LGBTQ I think is just an easy target. Because culturally it's a target in many cultures. And so it's the one that we can all point fingers at, as opposed to to take a bad metaphor of the NFL like, it's it's the jersey we can route against, even though the teammates on my jersey we don't really look at until I'm done beating the Browns. So how would you definition of what most people call unclean? And then how do you kind of reframe that?

Brandan 14:58

Yeah, I mean, that's the thing is that and I tried to, again very briefly, trace this in the beginning of the book. That this whole idea of clean and unclean emerges in the Hebrew Bible out of a culture in which purity-this ritualized sense of purity-is something that was very important not just to the Hebrew people, but to people in surrounding societies. They had their version of what made them ritually pure and clean. But the thing that we failed to understand even though the Christian scripture the Christian Bible has plenty of writing of the Apostle Paul and Peter, and Jesus himself, saying this way of organizing the world is outdated and it's not true. It doesn't originate from God. It comes from humans. For some reason, we as humans seem to have this propensity to want to create this sense of in group and out group this clean and unclean.

And I think you're right in Western culture at least modern Western culture, homosexuality is easy to use as the unclean. Primarily because I think that a lot of heterosexual people just have this inherited “ick” factor, where gay love, or LGBT sex and love, is something a lot of heterosexual people don't spend a lot of time thinking about. And so when it's brought up, a lot of people's minds jump to that. And it's easy to demonize something you have no experience with and that you find personally unappealing.

And I think that we see that throughout the book, actually, as I tried to outline and in the first century Greco Roman world, there was a lot of separation and demonizing and marginalizing the people based on not just sexuality, but sexual practice itself. What role you played sexually in a relationship was how your identity and values socially was defined in ancient cultures. And as much as we think that we've evolved today, I still think we, in 2019 United States of America, still have this idea in our subconsciousness that says, if somebody is embodying something sexually, that we don't understand, or we don't find appealing that they are unclean and impure. And then we begin adding religious definitions to that and saying, God says they're unclean and impure, and sex and propensity to divide and label in and out. It's just a really powerful way to gain power and organize society. And yet, I don't think it's the way that God created or intended the world to be, even though the church itself has spent so much energy and time and still so much blood, frankly, defending this structure of clean and unclean.

Seth Price 17:59

And so this is what I found myself keep coming back to as people walk through the clobber passages and I don't want to flesh those out A: because we don't have enough time and B: because they're just low hanging fruit that anyone can Google just google clobber passages and just get after it. You talk about its relationship between patriarchy like a lot of those passages are deeply related to the cultural context. And in fact, you quote somebody, and I forget where to find it. You quoted a different person. Come on page…flip for me, Dr. Christopher. How do I say his last name one young? You? Yeah, I did it wrong. Both times. Dr. Christopher Yuan always said, quote,

…context isn't just King it's the whole deck of cards.

But I know that as I'd necessarily, you know, talked with people or read about it. I had never really connected the dots between the patriarchal aspects of those little medical and other biblical passages that people use to demonize people that do same sex form of relationships. How does that relate like so if someone's listening and they're like, Okay, so what does the quote unquote patriarchy because we use those words differently today. I think, you know, feminism, patriarchal, like how do we frame that in a way that as we go back and we reread the text, we're like, Okay, I see what you're getting at here. And then once I see what you're getting at here, why does that matter? Like, what does that change for me?

Brandan 19:22

Yeah, no, totally. I would say that the entire message of the book, at least in this particular iteration is that the gospel is liberation from patriarchy. That's the entire case I'm trying to make. That from Genesis to Revelation, there is a progression in Scripture, where patriarchy in the beginning of the Bible is the assumed ordering of creation. And by the time we get to Revelation, patriarchy has been dismantled fundamentally, and that Jesus is the linchpin in the middle of the biblical narrative that turns the entire direction of Scripture away from patriarchy and to liberation. And so all of that to say, if you don't understand the cultural context of Scripture, and I feel like everybody in every tradition says this, but it actually takes a lot of work to dig in and do the hard study of the biblical culture. But unless you do that, you really don't understand the Bible. And I'll probably get in trouble for saying this, but I sympathize a bit with the Roman Catholic Church in the medieval period, when it had the idea that we shouldn't give the Bible to lay people. Because it can be become really distorted very quickly if you're not doing the deep study that's necessary to understand the text.

Now, I don't believe we should take the Bible away from people, but what I am saying is that it took me three years of intensive study in seminary about one portion of the culture and context of Scripture to a see all that I've begun to sees in this particular conversation. And that opened my eyes suggests how important it is for us to realize, as we read the Bible, what we assume we understand, we should always immediately assume that we actually don't understand, and that there's layers upon layers of meaning.

And so, when you're reading the Old Testament, when you're reading the Hebrew Bible, and you're seeing these copper passages, which say things like,

a man shall not lie with a man, as with a woman, for this is an abomination.

On the surface, you might just take that for what it says, “oh, clearly, this is a condemnation of two men having sex, it's an abomination to God.” And that's the end of the story. Well, there's actually 15 layers of meaning beneath that. And when you begin to understand that patriarchy, which was the ordering of the ancient world, was built on three pillars and those pillars were the oppression of women, the oppression of ethnic and economic minorities, and the oppression of a effeminate men or men that were not living up to the culturally idealized standard of manhood. Those three pillars were how the ancient people in the Near East, ordered their society. And like most cultures, they used religion to justify their bias.

And so they took this culturally defined idea of pressing these three groups of people saying that women, economic and ethnic minorities, and effeminate men were lower than the dominant cultures cisgender heterosexual male. They began to encode that in the writing of Scripture and say, actually, this isn't just our bias, it's God's bias. This is how God ordered the world.

And you actually see it emerge in the Bible, you begin to see it from Genesis Chapter 12. And Abraham setting himself up as this patriarch, literally this leader, over his family and his people. But even from the very beginning, when God appoints Abraham to be the leader of the nation of Israel, he also says, and my actual plan here is for all nations to be blessed through you.

So we see at once, how the Hebrew people, in the writing of Genesis, were trying to elevate this idea of patriarchy. And yet there was this divine spiritual wisdom from the very beginning that was saying, actually, this ordering that you're trying to establish right now is not where all of this is going. I'm actually trying to create a world where all people, all nations, all tribes, tongues, colors, genders, sexualities will stand on equal footing. I think you really have to grasp how patriarchy emerged in ancient cultures in order to begin understanding the clobber passages and anything the Bible says about sexuality or gender identity.

Seth Price 23:52

Yeah, so this might not be a fair question, but you've done much more research on it than I have. So the way that you know the Western culture or just Christianity would use those passages does that also happen in…Does the Jewish current Jewish culture or the ancient Jewish culture do they have the same hang up that the western church does? And B, do the other Abrahamic faiths have the same hang up for the same reasons or not at all? Is that not even really a good question?

Brandan 24:24

Well, it's a great question. And it's really damning to the conservative Christian Western movement, and the Roman Catholic Church, that Judaism has been way ahead of us on these conversations by far. Because, and I think I talked about this, I can't remember whether it was this book or the last one, but in the beginning of one of them I talked about the Midrashic way of reading the text and the way the Hebrew people come to the Bible, is understanding that it has multiple layers of meaning. And that we're not going to take it literally, but we're going to see what it says for us, in our culture and in our context. And so the Jewish people, by and large, have been affirming of LGBT people and our relationships for generations. They've been affirming of women in leadership roles for generations. Now, of course, there are other sects of Judaism, the ultra orthodox for instance, that would look a lot more like a fundamentalist Christian in these ethics. But by and large, I mean, look at the State of Israel who is run by Jewish people who believe in following the rules of Torah. It's also the only society in the Middle East that is fully inclusive of LGBT people where marriage is legal, where LGBT people hold the same rights.

So I would say Judaism as a whole kind of condemns the way that Western Conservative Christians have misused and taken texts from the Bible and not understood their culture or context and tried to apply them in some literalistic fashion.

And Islam is a whole different story, right? It emerges from a patriarchal society, just like Judaism and Christianity. And in the Islamic world, I think you have the best image, if you want to see how patriarchy manifested in the time of Jesus, look at the modern Islamic world, and how in ultra Islamic countries, there is a really encoded patriarchy even in the operating of society today. But I think the difference for many Muslims, in at least the Middle East, there is still the belief that that is of God and that is what God has dictated from the very beginning. I think if you look at Western Muslims, it's a very different story, just like us progressive Christians. I think most Muslims, in the Western world, are open minded and willing to Give up this literalistic interpretation of their Scriptures and start moving towards them anti-patriarchal direction as well.

Seth Price 27:25

I spoke with someone recently and they had asked me kind of my hermeneutic of when I read Scripture. And I was like, you know, I run everything through a lens of Jesus didn't talk much about it, then what do I hear him talking around it? And then how does that kind of informed my heart. Like, you know, I'm gonna err on the side of Jesus every single time.

And so, to talk about like an inclusive lens or an inclusive interpretation, you talk about a theologian called William Webb, positing something, and I wrote this down and I can't read my writing. And so if I get the name of it wrong, correct me. But uh, a hermeneutic of redemptive, no…redemptive movement hermeneutic, something like that. What is that and kind of how does that work? And then how should that change the way that I read Scripture?

Brandan 28:10

Yeah, I mean, this is the thing that I when I discovered it was like pulling the brick out of the bottom of my foundation of theology and everything fell apart. And if Dr. Webb heard me say that you'd be mortified, because he's still a conservative evangelical, and comes to different conclusions than I do by far. But basically,he's not the first but he's probably the first major evangelical scholar to posit the idea that kind of what I've said, from the beginning of Genesis till the end of Revelation, there's a trajectory in Scripture, and that that's what God was always all about—revealing truth progressively over time. And so, William Webb posited that God didn't reveal all truth at one point, but was slowly revealing it. And as God revealed more truth he raises the ethical standard because that's what humanity is able to bear at various periods in our evolution.

And so just the example that I use all the time, an eye for an eye and a tooth for tooth was an ethical innovation in the book of Leviticus, because surrounding cultures taught that justice look like if you killed somebody in my family, it was right for me to slaughter your whole village. Well, the Hebrew people come along and say, actually, our God says, if you kill someone in my family, I can only kill someone in your family. And that was an ethical innovation.

But by the time we get to Jesus, Jesus says,

you have heard it said eye for an eye and a tooth for tooth, I say to you, bless those who curse you, turn the other cheek and love your enemy.

So he raises the standard, but it took 2000 years from the time Leviticus was revealed or 1500 years to when Jesus raised the standard again. So all of that to say it's this fundamental belief in progressive revelation that God is calling us forward and that continues beyond the Bible. And so William Webb posited in his book, Slaves, Women and Homosexuals, that slavery and the equality of women weren't achieved in the New Testament, but that the New Testament was pointing us in that direction. And that the women's suffrage movement and the civil rights movement, took the direction of Scripture, and took it to its logical conclusion. Which was full liberation and equality for women and people of color. Even though the Bible itself doesn't say that. It's the idea that the Spirit of God is definitely pointing humanity in that direction in the pages of Scripture. And he has this beautiful quote that I'm gonna butcher but it's in the book and it's something like, “to stop where the words of Scripture stop on these ethical issues, is to fail to understand the movement in the heart of God”. That God wasn't calling us to institute slavery and keep that system. No, we see from the way that the Hebrew Bible talks about slavery to the way Jesus This talks about slavery, and incredible ethical movements. And we need to move beyond where even Paul gets to, but it's like a big sign. It's an arrow pointing forward. And I would say the same thing you see with sexuality.

From the Hebrew Bible, you see very strong prohibitions. When you get to the New Testament, you see loosening prohibitions, and the way that I would say, homosexuality is not even addressed in the same way that it was addressed in the Hebrew Bible. And in the book, I talk about how Jesus himself in the way he subverted patriarchy in his own life. And the way he dealt with eunuchs and other sexual minorities point us in the direction of assuming that God's heart and God's desire is to liberate and include LGBT people into the life of the church as well.

Seth Price 31:45

So if the trajectory of Scripture and I just want to be real clear, Brandan, I agree with you, if the trajectory of Scripture is basically everything is inclusive. That leads me to question or does lead others to question me when I try to badly paraphrase you. Is there even a role for clean and unclean sin and unsin? Because most of the time, the pushback that I get is if you keep moving the line in the sand, eventually you're just standing in the ocean. Nothing is unclean, nothing is inherently evil.

And so if we're thinking about Scripture that way, and the gospel that way in the the story of Christ in a way that everything is being included and and reconciled, is there still a reason to call anything unclean? Like does that term even hold wait anymore, you know, for the years to come?

Brandan 32:41

Yeah, I think I'm glad you asked that question because I think you highlight a mistake people make which is unclean and sinfulness are not the same thing. The idea of clean and unclean is purely ritualistic, it has no moral connotation at all. It's all about there is a God in heaven who has determined these standards about what is clean and unclean to him. And it's not apparent to humanity. And so we need to listen for revelation from God. Otherwise we wouldn't know what's clean and unclean. It's these arbitrary standards that I think very clearly in the New Testament, Paul says, get rid of this. Peter has his vision and Acts chapter 10, where God says nothing that I have deemed to be clean shall be declared unclean.

Now, that doesn't mean that there isn't sin and not sinfulness. But our understanding of sin needs to move outside of this category of ritualized purity codes and into what is morally right and what is morally wrong. And this goes into a much bigger conversation, which is actually the topic of the next book I'm working on, where I dig into sexual ethics more deeply.

But our whole idea for instance, around sexuality as Christians, so many of our prohibitions are, again, arbitrary. We prohibit premarital sex, primarily because we say it's not pleasing to God. But I think the New Testament abolishes that arbitrary standard, how do you know what is pleasing to God and what is not pleasing to God? Instead, our sexual ethics should be rooted in what is healthy and whole for us because God's desires that we would live hold and abundant lives.

And I think if we started thinking of sexual ethics, that way, we might get rid of some of these arbitrary purity standards that say, sex is only for the confines of marriage alone, because the majority of culture is going to have sex outside of marriage, and it's not going to be harmful to them and it's not going to pull them away from God and it's not going to cause them to live unhealthy lives. That was just the purity idea!

Rather, we should be calling people to commitment we should be calling people to healthy behaviors, and self control. Those are the things that are actually moral; that actually cause you to live a more abundant life. And I think everything we can see in the person of Jesus…Jesus was not concerned with these ritualized ideas of what is good and what is bad. He was concerned with what is right in the here and now what will help people's lives be better and more abundant and in the flow of shalom today, not what's making this arbitrary God in the sky angry if we don't do it. But there's so much there, we could talk for that for an hour.

Seth Price 35:27

We, we could but two things is the book under 100 pages because if not, I'm gonna shoot you some form of an email and it has to it has to be based on the rules, the arbitrary, self imposed rules from earlier.

Brandan 35:37

(Laughter)

I'm trying to get to 175 or 200 it would be amazing just like something that makes me look like a legitimate author, but other than that…

Seth Price 35:48

Alright, so that's the first thing second thing when I hear you say all that, I hear a lot of that, but I'm gonna be real honest. That is a struggle for me because I have two beautiful daughters and when I hear you talking about that, like they're small now, but they won't be in a decade. And that thought, just the thought of it is terrifying. But like everything of my faith over the last decade, it's also been terrifying. Like, I'm, yeah, there's so many places my brain goes, I’m just gonna put it that way that makes me uncomfortable. But usually when I'm uncomfortable, I grow. But that terrifies me.

So what would you say to a dad like that's listening to that right now? That's going alright. Yeah, I actually ordered your book, I was going to read it Brandan. And then I'm hearing you say that this is okay. Or I hear you say that you're researching, I think, what do you say to the person in the background? That's like, you know, eyebrows going up? What did you just say? I feel it you talked about earlier, you know, talking about the Roman Catholic Church might get you in trouble. I think that one might more. So what I will do, how do I assuage fears a bit, and I say that, personally.

Brandan 36:56

Yep. I don't know if I'm gonna be able to calm anyone’s fears because what I'm going to say is why why do you feel that way? Like this is a deep dive into our spiritual psychology now because it's we've inherited culturally and religiously patriarchy. Like this idea that sexuality needs to be controlled and confined, is literally the way the church keeps power. This is literally the way, right now we're watching, the evangelical churches gain influence in this country because the Trump administration, for instance, has all of these policies that are anti-trans pro abortion, these are all sexual questions. This is how patriarchy works. And I believe patriarchy is antithetical to the gospel of Jesus Christ.

And so when we begin to have these fears, I always say when fear arises in us, we know we're not moving from a place where God is because I really do believe the presence of fear is the absence of God. I think we're not moving from a place of love and liberation. And that's not to condemn you or anybody else because I have those same impulses of fear. But the question is the call to deeper reflection, why does it make us feel uneasy to think of, for instance, your daughter's being in relationships that might not be marriage relationships, but they might have intimacy with somebody else? That's a hard question for a father, or anyone, to begin to think about. But it's also reality. It's also what happens for most people in our culture today.

And so I just think that's the call to begin rethinking and reforming because it's just what is happening by and large, almost every survey and study shows that a majority of people will engage sexually outside of marriage. And if you asked the majority of those people if they experienced a broken heart or if they are feel like an unclean withered flower, all the other bad youth group analogies that we were told, and it's just not experientially true.

And so, if our theology I say this all the time, and I think I said it on the last podcast, if theology and reality don't align your theology is the problem, not reality. And there's something really wrong with the way our patriarchal sexuality doesn't match up with what people actually experience in their day to day lives. And that, for me, is what I want to explore. And like I said, I'm at the very beginning stages of writing this book on sexual ethics, but it's definitely worth exploring because experience says that our theology is wrong on this.

Seth Price 39:39

Well, I think and I don't know why. So I've had this conversation at a high level with friends of mine that are in my peer group and age group. But I've never actually and I don't know why when you said it, like, I inherently thought of my kids, probably because I'm right underneath her. And that you're right. It is more about me, and I don't know what that is. Probably won't sleep tonight. And so thank you.

So, I asked Serene…Serene? Gosh, I can't think of her name right now. Jones, yeah from Union Theological. You what what the things are that matter for seminaries that are training pastors for the for the coming years. She didn't necessarily list that one, but it's definitely on the list, you know, LGBTQ concerns, the way that we treat others, you know, immigration. But also, you know, the view on marriage matters and premarital sex also matters. But I think for me, it hits too close to home. And so from there, I'm going to hit pause, and I'm going to pivot back to your book, because I am if you could see me, I'm squirming.
And I'm not going to edit any of this out because I'm going to try to be as transparent as possible.

So there's a chapter, I think it's chapter five, leveling the ground in a moment. To quote you a bit here, if that's all right, so you talk about

Jesus's very behavior and social position within the Roman Empire also would have caused him to be viewed as feminine when contrasted with the citizen men of the Roman Empire.

I've never heard anybody say that. And so what do you mean by the way that he postures himself, the way that he presents himself, the way that he I would argue preaches presents him in a feminine mentality. Because then you go further and talk about the crucifixion as a form of emasculation, which is also something I've never really broached. But when I read it, I found myself nodding like, yeah, this makes sense. I've never heard this before. But yes, this makes sense.

Brandan 41:41

Yeah. So that's my favorite part of the book, and not to toot my own horn here, but I think like that's the part I'm proudest about. Because I began to discover that this is deep in the scholarship and I like that part of the book the best because I quote so many amazing people who say groundbreaking, mind blowing things. But again, understanding the culture that Jesus was in. Once you begin to unpack it, you're like, this guy was really radical! Like not just in some weird political way, like, the way he lived his life would have caused anyone who saw him walking down the street in the Greco-Roman society to raise their eyebrows and say what is this freak doing! He's different. And it's the Jesus, the way he held himself. First of all, as somebody who preached against Empire period, that enough is to say he's anti-status quo. He's anti-patriarchy, because he called out the powers that were in the powers were all cisgender men who tried to be sexually dominant.

Jesus, as far as we know, unless you're Dan Brown and The DaVinci Code was unmarried. Jesus spent his life calling men away from their families to follow him calling women away from their families to follow Him. And the way he presented himself in the Empire calling for the deconstruction of power structures, that posture itself is feminine in Greco-Roman consciousness. Because in the Greco-Roman world again, your status in society was literally tied to what you did with your penis-to put it very bluntly. And if you were going to be a powerful, influential, person in society, you were a dominant sexual penetrator and also a militant penetrator, you would have fought in the Army or at least been in high powers of government that would have allowed you to have penetrative influence over society.

And Jesus was not that. He resisted that, in fact, he hung out with the people that were the worst of the worst in Roman society. And I think something I didn't spend a lot of time in the book looking at, but it's worth deep deep study for anyone interested in this, is how Jesus when he speaks about and hangs out with eunuchs, eunuchs are the worst of the worst of the worst in Roman society. Because these are men, who either by choice or as a punishment or by birth, gave up their ability to use their sexual organs in the penetrative way which was what made you powerful and manly in the Roman Empire. So these were men who literally became lower than women in the status quo of the Empire.

And Jesus comes along and says some amazing things about eunuchs becoming eunuchs for the sake of the Kingdom and being first in the Kingdom. Like that kind of language would have made Jesus, and this is not meant to be a shock jock overstatement, like a radical queer theologian in the midst of a Greco-Roman society. You don't say that about a eunuchs and you don't identify with a eunuchs. And we could keep going down this path I actually think Jesus, the crucifixion aspect, is actually where Jesus most profoundly becomes an image of somebody who's emasculated and queer and in solidarity with women and people of color and LGBT people, But in his life, he definitely used his position of privilege as a male and he gave up a lot of that privilege that society would have bestowed on him, if he would have allowed it.

And Paul's the great example, as the last thing I'll say, of somebody who even as a Jewish person used his patriarchal power in his life before Jesus, and he was a dominant male who went around killing and had the blessing of the Empire and the religious establishment. And then when he comes to find Christ, lots of scholars would assume that the Apostle Paul may have been married and he left his wife and that's a whole…I'm opening up so many cans of worms there…and went and followed this celibate rabbi which is such a queer thing to do.

Seth Price 46:08

You said there's a last thing to say but I'm gonna ask you to say more. So how is the cross then, how is the crucifixion itself an emasculating symbol? Basically so if I want to, if I'm going to oversimplify it, like the cross for me would equate to a public lynching…you know, 60-70 years ago here in America. So how do those two emasculate?

Brandan 46:39

This is the stuff that really got me jazzed because it's so so eye opening. The information about the cross is always right in front of us like this is not hidden deep knowledge. But nobody ever told me this and it makes so much sense.

The reason that cross was such a profound, and horrific, means of execution was not just because it was a painful way to die. But if you read the crucifixion account of Jesus, it actually mirrors what they did to anyone who was crucified. From being stripped down naked before the council that was judging him and being mocked and dressed in feminine clothing; which was this robe that they put on him in this crown of thorns. This whole process, this whole drama is literally meant to be taking the masculinity away from the person they're about to crucify.

So they're taking Jesus from being a man to being less than a man parading him through the city as this powerless. The word that Diana Swancutt uses, they took this man who was being proclaimed King of the Jews, and they made him a “queen”. Like this idea that he was this powerless little thing that the Empire was penetrating with its power, and then they put him on the cross and the reason Romans used nails was because in this hyper patriarchal culture penetration, it was all sexual. It was meant to symbolize that he was literally being to put it crassly raped by the Empire, that they were dominating him. And so Jesus goes to the cross and is pierced in his hands and his size and his brow. And this is all symbolic of him being destroyed by the Empire-emasculated.

And the other thing that was really eye opening is that every account of crucifixion outside of the account of Jesus, it's really clear also that the Empire physically raped the person they were about to crucify. And when you begin to think that Jesus likely was physically raped by the Roman Centurions before he was crucified, that adds a whole other layer to one: how profound the love of God is for abused and for those for survivors of sexual assault. That God in the flesh, the incarnation of God, literally was put through some of the most horrific forms of abuse that has also been perpetuated by the church, by the way. That our, our Savior went through that. That's profound! And it also says something when we believe in our theology that Jesus undertakes this willingly. That's the power here.

That Jesus goes to the cross, knowing that he's going to go through this emasculating process, and he does it willingly as the act of Salvation. And if that's true, then the resurrection is the ultimate subversion, and victory, and the humiliation of this entire patriarchal system. The most powerful empire that ever was tried to crucify Jesus tried to emasculate him with their patriarchal power and the risen Christ comes back still penetrated still bearing the wounds as the Risen victorious lamb. Not through crucifixion, not through dominating his enemies, but through the power of forgiveness, grace, and love. And, again, there's so much I could dig into that, but it's just such a beautiful, profound image.

Seth Price 50:19

I want to push that further because as you're talking in I think this is in the book, I'm certain that it's not. So how then does that feminizing of Christ relate to you know, at Easter which we all will Christians celebrated recently…I'm not entirely certain when this will air. Where you know, you have if it weren't for women, you know, the gospel, you know, that it's the women that are coming to get the disciples and the Apostles it's the women that are yelling out, no, come and see, like, it's, it's empty! So, how do those two relate that, you know, that the Empire has, you know, feminized him and then it's the matriarchal voice that pushes it forward.

Brandan 51:02

Yeah, I actually have not really thought deeply about that. But it is really a interesting thing to think about. As Jesus is emasculated, it makes sense on one hand that the men would be more afraid than the women. And so the men leave Jesus at the cross and go and hide. nd it's his mother and Mary that are standing there weeping watching this happen. It says something about the power of femininity. It's a beautiful statement about men not being always the most powerful or the ones that are the bravest. But like you said, it was the women who stood by Christ at the cross. It's the women who took his body to the tombs. It is the women who were there when he rose again. And he rises again as Christopher who I quote in the book says, the image of the Lamb of God in Revelation risen is this beautiful image in the ancient mind of masculinity and femininity in perfect balance because you have the penetrated and pierced one but also the one standing in dominance and victory. And I think that's what God desires for the church and for the world. This equality and balance and equilibrium of masculinity and femininity as culture and sexuality all standing equal in the beauty of diversity.

Seth Price 52:23

Towards the tail end of your book and a promise I'm wrapping this up Brandon. So towards the tail end there is appendices after appendices. I think there's three appendices. I like those because as I read through them, like, oh, I've read some of these before. And then I realized we're just different things that you'd written in the past that all kind of feed into this. But I found some of the logical questions that I would have more easily answered there.

But something that I didn't see or I missed, or I glanced over, and you talked about it at the very beginning, I think in chapter one, or maybe in the introduction of the risk of psychological and physical-but really-psychological harm to those that are classified as “other” as “unclean” as unworthy, as unredeemable by the at least the church in the country that we live in. And so I want to try to end with that.

So the marginalization of LGBTQ and that entire community causes just some massive damage. With suicide and with homelessness and with so many other things. And so for those listening that are like, you know, I can do better in my church, I can do better in my community. I can do better in my family, possibly, depending on who's listening. Where would you send people to that to try to do better because unfortunately the church always seems to follow way too slow. Like we're being guided by the Holy Spirit. We're definitely not listening. We're being dragged, but we need to be leading this. So how do we begin to repair the psychological harm that our culture, that our proof texting in our literal flat reading our “Flat Stanley” reading of the Bible has caused?

Brandan 54:02

Yeah, that is a good and important question. I think you said something really profound and it's something that it's hard to see from the inside of the church. But it really God always, I think God gives the the message to God's people first. And the pattern that we see throughout the Bible and in the modern era, is that God's people generally reject the message and it's always the outsiders or the unclean, so to speak that get it first. And I think culture has is doing far more and far better than the church at reducing harm and addressing psychological damage. And because of that, most of the resources that exist…(call drops here with a loud clatter)

Seth Price 54:57

(ringing Brandan…humming)

Brandan 55:00

Hello…

Seth Price 55:01

I lost you.

Brandan 55:00

How long ago did you lose me?

Seth Price 55:02

Well, it sounded like your phone literally dropped to the ground. The last thing that I heard was because of that most of the resources that we have are outside...

And then it sounded like glass shattering. So I hope you didn't drop your phone.

Brandan 55:18

(Chuckles) No, that was must have been…it's the judgment of God coming down.

(laughter from both)

Seth Price 55:26

Okay, (still laughing) are you able to…(still laughing) are you able to pick up where you left off there?

Brandan 55:30

Yeah, most of the resources that exist, are outside of the church. It's organizations like the Trevor Project in the Tyler Clementi Foundation, and Faith in America and GLAAD these organizations are doing great work to receive the youth that we're pushing out of the church and that are being rejected from families and they're giving them resources that they need to heal and find restoration and renewal. So I would definitely point people, first and foremost, outside of the church, to things that are actually going to help the psychological healing of LGBT youth and LGBT people in general that have been hurt by the church.

But for those who are within the institution, for evangelical people in general, I would say the most important first step that you can take and that you need to take to reduce harm is to begin by changing your rhetoric and posture. There are some things that we just cannot say and cannot preach and cannot believe anymore because they're so discredited; they're so untrue. And certain ways of posturing ourselves, the fruit that it bears is just too clear, it's damage, it's death.

And so those things are, we've got to stop telling people that their sexuality or gender identity is a choice and that having a queer or different sexuality or gender identity is fundamentally broken or an abomination. You don't have to change your theology and believe all the crazy heresy that I said on this podcast, you don't have to ever embrace that. That's fine. But stop telling people that their sexuality is something they can choose or not choose! Because the distress that causes in somebody's mind to know that they're not actually choosing this, and yet, they're being told they need to stop choosing it, that creates such a cycle of despair, that leads people down the path of self-harm, self-hatred. And not only does that cause them physical and psychological trauma, that makes them not want to buy into this whole Christian thing because, again, experientially they know it's not true. And like I said earlier, when your theology and reality come clashing together, it's the theology that needs to change.

So I would consider it a victory for all of my work is if we could just stop getting Christians to stop telling LGBT people that their sexuality, their gender identity is fundamentally broken and that it's a choice. If we get rid of that rhetoric I think we would see such a decrease in hostility between our two communities. Because LGBT people, and gay Christians, the reason that so many of us are so afraid and so against so much of the church is because they keep saying these things that we just know, that the world knows are fundamentally untrue, and are causing harm. And if the church would just take a few steps to change its posture and tone and heart. I think we would have a different conversation moving forward.

And so that's what I would say. And then, like I said, point people to resources that are outside the church that are really helping to bring healing and hope to LGBT people.

Seth Price 58:56

Yeah, yeah. Good. Well, where do we point them to get to you now the book is everywhere and it also be in the show notes from I believe is it is it cascade which what's weapon stock, but it's the same thing. But how do they get in touch with you? How do they hear you preach? Because I'll be honest, like when you get on Twitter or not Twitter when you get on Instagram and you preach like, I just I'm sucked in like, I just lie. I like to hear you preach. So how do they hear you? How do they get connected with you and some of the stuff that you're doing?

Brandan 59:22

Yeah, well, if you go to BrandonRobertson.com; I have links to the church website where we have YouTube, all my sermons and books and blogs and all of that fun stuff. So that would be the best way.

Seth Price 59:37

Perfect, perfect. Well, thank you again for coming on. We're gonna have to do it again.

Brandan 59:43

Yeah, I would love to.

Seth Price 59:45

Next time though don't scare me. Don't scare me.

Brandan 59:46

I’ll try not to and thanks for staying up late. I hope you can get some sleep tonight. (laughs)

Seth Price 1:00:01

I've really struggled with how to in this one really have. And so I just want to say, just very little words, but the issue of homosexuality is not going away. Gender binaries is not going away. The way that we view sex is not going away. And human diversity is full of such a wide range of things that are loved and beautiful and created by God. I really hope you enjoy today's conversation. If you have not yet consider becoming a patron supporter of the show. I'll talk with you all in a week.

Talk to you soon.

Bye.