Christianity and Buddha with Paul F. Knitter

Note: Can I Say This at Church is produced for audio listening. If able, I strongly encourage you to listen to the audio, which has inflection, emotion, sarcasm where applicable, and emphasis for points that may not come across well in written word. This transcript is generated using a combination of my ears and software, and may contain errors. Please check the episode for clarity before quoting in print.

Back to the Audio Episode


Paul Knitter 0:00

For me, one of the most beautiful descriptions of who Jesus is, for us Christians, is formulated by a friend of mine a theologian John Cobb, Jesus is the way that is open to other ways. Jesus is the way, I mean the way, that is open to other ways. I think that that for me, kind of describes how Jesus has enriched my life, given me a grounding and ability to experience a God of love and the God of justice who at the same time called me to be open, critically open, not just you know, empty mindedly open critically open but genuinely open to other ways to other religions.

Seth Price 1:10

So I think most people, you know, as they get out of, you know, high school or college and they begin life. And they find out, like me that religion doesn't really fit into that tight box. And if you're also like me, as you begin to work through faith, and work through everything about faith, you realize that there's a lot of truth in other faiths. And I touched on this briefly, you know, a few weeks ago when I spoke with Barbara Brown Taylor, but I am falling in love with I just want to be real clear, (I) love Jesus, and I don't know that I will ever not be a Christian. But that doesn't mean that there isn't things in faith that are as equally true, or as equally beautiful, that are not my own. Faiths that I'm not familiar with, but they need to be wrestled with. And so that's what this conversation is about.

If you do not know who Paul Knitter is, I didn't either. So he was recommended to me by one of the supporters of the show on Patreon. And so, Paul, other Paul, if you're listening, thank you so much. And to each of the Patreon supporters, a lot of the last probably month or so of interviews have come from recommendations from that community. And so just a small aside, if you haven't yet thought about becoming a supporter of the show, do that because your voice has weight. And you are amongst the most engaged listeners of the show. And I am humbled by those of you that take the time to support the show in any way possible. But back to Paul, Knitter. Paul wrote a book called Without Buddha I Could Not be a Christian, and I wasn't sure what to expect. You know, as Paul and I talked, both Paul's and I talked, there came a point and you'll hear it later in the conversation. I still haven't finished the book because I can't get past the chapter. There is a wall I keep coming up against in chapter five over and over again. And I should probably just listen to the advice that you'll hear later from Paul on that wall.

And so thank you for being here. Let me know your thoughts on this episode, shoot me a tweet, hit me up on Facebook, share the show and say something about it. shoot me an email, find all those avenues to do that at CanISayThisAtChurch.com. I really hope that you enjoy this conversation. Here we are…Paul F Knitter

Seth Price 3:47

Paul F Knitter. I really enjoyed over the last few weeks reading. Without Buddha I Could Not be a Christian. And then I began to realize that you have other things that I've never read as well. And then a mutual friend. Also Paul put us into communication. And so Paul, if you're listening, and I'm gonna assume that you are thanks for referring me, but thank you so much for being on the show. Paul, I'm glad you're here.

Paul Knitter 4:08

I'm delighted to be here Seth.

Seth Price 4:10

So your story is different than most, most intellectuals are most theologians, your story's a bit different. You've been in multiple circles, multiple. You've had multiple influences in your faith. And so I wonder for those listening, if you could quickly, kind of bring us up to speed on the high points of what is made you I guess, the Christian that you are today?

Paul Knitter 4:28

Yeah. Okay. as as as briefly and as clearly as possible is that I was brought up I was brought up in Chicago, in a traditional middle class Roman Catholic family. Which meant my parents took their their, their faith seriously, but they were not inquires. I mean, that was basically you go to church on Sunday. And as soon as the Catholic schools anyway. (Now) out of eighth grade, I had the expect an invitation to consider going to what was called then a minor or high school seminary to begin the long process of becoming a Roman Catholic priest.

So out of eighth grade, I went into the seminary. It was a religious order called the Society of the Divine Word or Divine Word Missionaries. I wanted to become a missionary. And my motivation was that I felt that if I really loved these people in other religions, I had to convert them. Now we're talking this is back in 19…(laughs) 1952, a long time ago, but if I really loved them, I had to convert them because otherwise their chances for eternal salvation were pretty well, nil. And so I went and I began the process and it was a 14 year process, up to ordination. And during the course of those years, I started also to studied these other religions and I began to wonder about them because I saw what seemed to be a lot of really neat, interesting, if not really good, things in these other religions.

Well, in the midst of those kind of questions, I had one of the greatest gifts that God has given me in my life. I was chosen, this was in now in 1962, 10 years later, to go and finish the last four years of my seminary studies, the four years of theological studies, in Rome, Italy, at the Gregorian University. Kind of one of the primary Catholic universities in the world which was a privilege in itself. But I just landed in Rome in the end of September 1962 and two weeks later, on October 11, the Second Vatican Council began. So I ended up being in Rome for the years of the Council and not only that but I was studying at a collegial, a house of studies, where we had about a 24 Bishops, missionary Bishops, from around the world who were there for the council. And so we seminarians talk with these bishops every day. In fact, a lot of them could no longer read or understand Latin and all of their homework from the council was in Latin, so we seminarians translated for them.

(laughter)

And that was part of my theological education-reading all these sup secreto documents, confidential documents, anyway, but that was at a moment when I was struggling with how to understand other religions. And then my Roman Catholic Church, not known to be an especially progressive church., I don't have to make that out. Did make a declaration called in Latin name is Nostra aetate. The attitude of the Catholic Church towards other religions in which it said that we should be ready to look for and experience and see God in other religions. This was tremendous. This was revolutionary, I never would have never dreamed this!

So anyway, that opened up my interest to pursue the study of other religions and to promote a dialogue with other religions. And that's what was the topic of my of my doctoral dissertation, which I did, I had the privilege of then going to Germany to finish my studies and studying under Karl Rahner, one of the best known Roman Catholic theologians. And since then, my efforts have been to carry out the instructions of the Second Vatican Council. We Catholics are known to be very obedient and the Council said you should dialogue with other religions. So I took that seriously. And it gradually developed (into) how to understand Christianity, my own faith, in the light of what I believe God is doing in other religions. And I'm almost finished here, I want to make this too long winded, but as I developed in the effort to promote dialogue among religions, the religion that attracted me more and more—and I can't explain why—was Buddhism.

And so I began to teach, I was now teaching at Xavier University in Cincinnati, Ohio. I have a by the way, I should add this-I was ordained a priest in 1966, in Rome, but it was in 1972 when I returned to the United States, having finished my doctorate that I knew I had to make up my mind whether I wanted to stay in the active ministry. And in 1975, I received permission from the Vatican to leave the priesthood, the active priesthood, but to carry on as a theologian.

So anyway…

Buddhism became the religion that more and more engaged me. And I began to teach courses on Buddhism, I began to find the Buddhist teachers and to start doing Buddhist meditation. And gradually, I realized that Buddhism was helping me understand my own Christian faith more deeply. My friendship once Buddhism was deepening my friendship with and commitment to Jesus Christ. And I just was kind of “what's going on!”

And so I did what theologians generally do, when they have a question…I wrote a book to try to explain and figure out for myself and for my fellow Christians, because I want to make sure what I understand to be my Christian faith can resonate, at least with some other Christians. No Christian can be a loner, Christians are Christians within a community, within a church. And so I wrote this book to see if others Christians, if this made sense for other Christians. And I must say it's been a book that has really enabled me to be engaged with other Christians on this conversation. And here we are doing it again with you, and I'm so happy to be here!

Seth Price 11:17

I am as well. And again, thank you for being here.

I want to tie up some of those loose ends just because the organized part of my brain doesn't like that. So how is it that you became chosen at such a young age? Because eighth grade that's like, what, 12-13 years old? And then you would have been going to Rome when you were 21? And I'm assuming that the math checks out there. If it doesn't that’s fine…

Paul Knitter 11:36

Yeah that’s it!

Seth Price 11:38

So is that like academic based is that they're watching you pray and being like, this guy's got something here or is it the questions that you're asking the teachers that you're being obstructed from, like, how does that even happen?

Paul Knitter 11:50

Well, I mean, when I the decision to leave, is that I left home when I was 12 years old, something I would never advise other young boys or girls to do. But I left home practically and went to this minor seminary boarding seminary and I left home, came home for Christmas and for summer vacations during high school, but after that, I just didn't come home.

Seth Price 12:14

Yeah, I assume with the blessing of your family.

Paul Knitter 12:17

My parents were not happy to let me go at 12 years old, but they felt, you know, Catholics, they felt God was calling me. I felt God was calling me. And I believe that was the case. But it was much too young to start. Anyway, I got started and things went well and when it came time for the last four years of my seminary training they asked for volunteers of people who would want to finish their studies in Rome. I was one of them.

And it you know, they did a lot of things, I you know, I did fairly well in my studies. And so, I was selected.

Seth Price 12:57

The book that you've referenced Without Buddha I Could Not Be a Christian. And so I feel like that is a question in and of itself. And so before we dive into ripping that apart, can I just say why? Like, it's a simple question, but I also think it's deeply a hard question to answer.

Paul Knitter 13:14

Right. When I say without Buddha I could not be a Christian. I am not saying that that should be the case for other Christians in no way. That was just kind of a, you know, it's a little bit of a hype title. I mean, a publisher liked the title

Seth Price 13:32

It makes people pick it up. What’d he say!?

Paul Knitter 13:35

Right, right. You know, what the hell is this guy talking about? But there is something to it Seth. In dealing with trying to figure out what I believe as a Christian trying to figure out who is and what is God for me? How do I experience God? How do I understand God? It's those questions that theologians grapple with, of course, what does it mean to say that Jesus is the Son of God? What does it mean to say that Jesus is the Savior of the world? How do we live out, another question, how do we really live out our commitment to what Jesus called the kingdom of God, the reign of God? These were questions that I had trouble answering and figuring out, you know, despite the, you know, the gift that I had of, of studying theology. And the more I then studied Buddhism and practice Buddhism, I found that Buddhism was giving me insights, providing a kind of a little bit of a flashlight, a Buddhist flashlight with which I could look at my Christian doctrines, and I could look at the Bible. I could understand the books and the lectures from teachers of mine in Rome, and then later in Germany with Karl Rahner for instance. That Buddhism seemed to be kind of the, you know, the glasses I was wearing. But which enabled me to focus more clearly on what the Bible is saying and what Christians were saying. I mean we could get into particulars but I mean, that's the general. And it's not to say, I mean, strictly speaking, I think I could have found such help elsewhere and Christians find such help elsewhere. But for me, in my particular situation, I can't imagine being a Christiag, breaking bread at the Eucharist, every Sunday, praying in the morning, reading the New Testament of the Bible without this kind of this little Buddha on my shoulder, giving me advice and opening up possibilities, something like that Seth. I don't know if that's clear…

Seth Price 16:00

No, it is clear.

Paul Knitter 16:01

If I may just just add this Seth, what I think I experienced is precisely what this I think the Second Vatican Council and many other Christian theologians-Catholic and Protestant-are saying is the advantage of inter-religious dialogue. That studying and exploring and another religion is an opportunity given to us, I think by God and by the Holy Spirit, by which we can understand our own self. You know, a, a mentor of mine, a theologian now dead, Raimon Panikkar, and a good friend, he was once said,

to answer the question who is my God? I have to ask the question, who is your God?

In other words, hearing from you about who is your God will help me understand who is my god and we're talking about the same God of course, but different understandings of God.

Seth Price 16:59

Do you feel like this might be an unfair question, Paul, “Catholics” big C Catholics in general. Do you feel like they've leaned into Vatican II of engaging into other faiths? Or that it was just lip service?

Paul Knitter 17:17

Oh no, no. I think I think that it is an openness to other religions and an eagerness and effort to engage other religions in conversation and in cooperation, I think that is something that characterizes a significant percentage of Roman Catholics. Not that all of them are engaged, but this openness. Maybe I'm being too too optimistic here. Because there are a lot of very I don't know what word to use more traditional Catholics, as I was traditional, up to the Second Vatican Council and believing that not only was Christianity the only one true religion, but only the Catholic Church was the one true Church, Christian church. You know I think they're moving beyond that.

And I must say that the the Vatican itself under Pope Paul VI who was the Pope after the Vatican Council, and and then again, under John Paul II, the Vatican itself has a special special Commission for the promotion of inter religious dialogue. So it's both institutionally, as well as more popularly our pastorally, I think openness to other religions is something that is growing.

Seth Price 18:49

In chapter two, or I think you did three chapters on Nirvana and the concepts around those and so I think from memory, I have the book in front of me, but I'm not gonna cheat Nirvana and the gods Nirvana and God the personal other two questions about each other? And this is the question that I emailed you as an example of one of the questions, but I have two questions. So I had crowdsource some questions on Facebook and a friend of mine had said, and I want to make sure I quote him correctly. He wanted to know kind of why you think humanity needs “people groups” to hate or to loathe? Where does that route stem from, to distinctly classify people as other? And then that kind of relates to the question that I sent you where, you know, there's a section in your book where you talk about anthropomorphism, and that that problem especially comes to terms when we talk about evil. And then you say that there's a Buddhist friend that would say, well, what's the problem for us there is no God and so there's therefore no person and there's no problem. And so I don't understand kind of, you know, how that has to do with the crux of everything. Anthropomorphism and how we classify other people as “other”.

Paul Knitter 20:04

Yeah. That’s a pretty big question there Seth! It's three more

Seth Price 20:06

There's a tiny question.

Paul Knitter 20:09

(laughter) I don't know, they're two distinct questions. So they're related, of course, maybe to start with anthropomorphism and God? Because this is an area where Buddhism has helped me retrieve what I think is an important, but often neglected, part of our Christian tradition, namely the mystical tradition. But for Buddhism, you know, it is not correct to say that Buddhism simply denies the existence of God and is therefore an atheistic religion. You hear that said sometimes, and that I think is entirely inaccurate, and incorrect. Buddhists don't have an understanding of ultimate reality. Seth, I'm going to use that word for a moment rather than use the word God I'm going to use the word “the ultimate reality”, namely, the source of our existence, the Sustainer of our existence, that which grounds everything.

Buddhists don't talk about that reality in terms as a “someone” or as “something”. They're very reluctant to use such language of ultimate reality in an anthropomorphic language is saying God is a father or God is a he or God is a mother or a God is a creator. They, for them, using such language runs the risk of diluting the mystery of Ultimate Reality, I would say the mystery of God. It forgets that God is a word,l which is really a pointer to something which is beyond all words.

I mean, God is a mystery that none of us can ever understand! We can experience that that mystery, that reality, but we can never find adequate words for it. That's something that we Christians, especially we Catholics, have forgotten. Because we take our words much too seriously. Catholics have a lot of dogmas, you know, unchangeable truths. So, Buddhists have stress therefore that, “hey, the reality that we're talking about is beyond words and it's better to simply leave it open”. And so they use words like…the one word for ultimate reality for Buddhism, from Buddha is shunyata, which means emptiness. Now that doesn't mean empty-a void-it just means it's it's empty of all all identifiable existence. God is not a thing. God is a reality that is a source of being for everything.

And when I read that, when I hear that, from Buddhism I go, that's what St. Thomas Aquinas was talking about, it seems to me. When I studied St. Thomas Aquinas in the seminary, you know, the description of God that Aquinas gives is, God, in Latin, ipsum esse subsistens, being itself, existence itself, the being of all beings. Now, that's kind of heady language. But the Buddhists don't want to use language that's going to capture God. But what the Buddhists say is that ultimate reality, or what you Christians call God, is something you can experience, you can feel it. You can come to it. Then you say well how?

And the Buddhist responds with the cause of the Eightfold Path. He said, well, first of all, you got to get your moral life in order. If you are hurting other people unnecessarily, no matter what prayers or meditation you use, it's not going to work. So get your moral life together and make sure you're not harming other people: in your words, in your deeds or in your profession. Right action, right speech, right profession.

Anyway, then Buddhism promotes, urges, insists on, some form of meditative practice. Now, some schools of Buddhism stress this more than others, but all of them recognize the need for some kind of medication by which, and Seth this is a very inadequate description of meditation, but it's some kind of practice and it's not foreign to us. Christians, but some kind of practice where you shut up. You just shut up. In other words, stop talking, stop thinking, and just let your thoughts go and release yourself. Just be in the present moment and see what happens. And see what happens. And I think that meditation is also practiced in different forms, you know by Christian mystics.

(leans in close)

And by the way, Seth, I would have to add here as a footnote, we Catholics have a lot more mystics than you Protestants.

Seth Price 25:47

I think that’s why I fall more and more in love with a lot of the Catholic writings, I think because of that. Recently, I mean, even in our email, you know, I'd say you know, I was trying something different during the season of Lent, and you asked…what? And what I find is my Protestant friends don't ask me what that new thing is because I honestly don't think that they know how to handle the answer. But any of my Catholic friends or people that are in that tradition, they're like, Well, tell me what you're doing! Tell me how it’s impacting you! Tell me how you said lectio Divina.

Paul Knitter 26:11

And you said (to Paul in an email) Lectio Divina, and that's a form of meditation.

Seth Price 26:14

I love it. I've been doing that. And I've been doing the Examen. Well, Lectio Divina for just Lent but Examen for almost a year now, intentionally. And I'll be honest, sometimes Paul, I fall asleep sometimes on bad days.

Paul Knitter 26:27

And that’s okay.

Seth Price 26:29

But usually I don't.

I'm gonna take something from my Protestantism that you hear preached every single Sunday. And so if God is something entirely bigger than any image that I, well, every time we talked about God we're talking about a metaphor, always because, and I tell people often, that's what the whole Bible is—it's the best words that I have to talk about something I have no way to describe. And then I'm gonna write it down. And some smart people, hopefully, some smart people will condense it into something that can be passed down to you and me and my kids and their kids. So then I don't want to come off as arrogant, prideful, but I bear the image of God, hyperbolically like, “sure I hear you say that, Paul”, but I bear the image of God, not my dog; Scripturally…not my dog. You know, you'll hear people say that. So how do I wrestle with that? If I'm gonna de-anthropomorphize something, but then also still say that I bear the image of the Divine?

Paul Knitter 27:39

Well, I mean, I think the that's a profound question and it's right there in the opening chapters of our Bible, in the Hebrew Bible, we are made in the image and likeness of God. And now that itself is a metaphor, right it’s poetry. What is it getting at? Well, I think what we, Christians, but also Buddhists especially a Tibetan Buddhists, and well I won't get into all the different forms of Buddhism, but they they recognize that what this ultimate reality is, the Buddhists say, is an interconnecting energy or power that pervades everything; that connects everything so that no thing, no human being, can exist by itself. We exist through this interconnected network of mutual giving and taking from each other. Another word for mutual giving or taking, love. That's what love is. It's l when I give you my love and when I receive love from you, and I feel find that that is lifegiving, both to give and receive. So this inherent giving and taking, this interconnecting, this love. For us Christian, Seth, I see one of the metaphors, one of the beautiful symbols, that we use for that is Spirit, the Holy Spirit, the all pervading Spirit. So, to say that we are made in the image and likeness of God means that we are receptacles of and vehicles for this loving energy that is God's very big. Insofar as a human being really care for another human being or beings to the point that he or she is ready to undergo hardships, maybe even give up their life for someone else. That human being, whether they call themselves an atheist or not, is for me, living and expressing God's life. They may not identify it as that way, because of all the, I think strange, weird images of God that they have heard about. But from my perspective, that human being is living as an image, and the likeness, of God insofar as he or she is giving and receiving, caring, compassion and love for others.

Seth Price 30:32

I wrote this down, and I don't want to come off as flippant. You talk a lot in your book about language and how language is entirely inadequate to talk about God. And I'll use God in the same metaphorical way that we've been using it the whole way. And then you ask a question, and it's one that I underlined and so, I'll ask it to you. You say, but here's the rub that we felt in all the earlier chapters where we're talking about a definition of evil. We're talking about the sunyata. We're talking about a bunch of other things. And then you say How do we understand all of this traditional language? And by that I mean, you know, original sin, and grace and salvation and evil, and church? And then so you say, “how do we understand all this traditional language about Jesus, but for our time? “

So I'm currently Baptist, so as a Baptist or as a Episcopalian or as a Catholic, how do I then break apart or treat well, the relationship between language and Jesus, especially as I do this every single week, and I want to do so well? How do I nuance those?

Paul Knitter 31:38

Yeah, well, it's an absolutely essential question for us Christians, whether you're a Catholic or a Baptist or whatever, because we Christians understand Jesus of Nazareth as the incarnation of the Word of God. You know, the Trinity, the doctrine of the Trinity, the three aspects of divine nature, if we say, Father, Word, and Spirit, second was either Son or Word and Spirit. So Jesus is the embodied Word of God. So we’ve got to take that seriously. And so this is where I kind of get back to this Seth, while language is always inadequate, it is also necessary. Because we're human beings we need we need something to grab us, to stimulate us, and those are words like God is love. Words like God is creator. Words like God “is” is a Divine Word.

So this it stimulates us and it opens up experiences. You see the words invite us to experiences and the experiences tell us that the words are true, but inadequate. Because once you start to enter into the experience of God, the ultimate reality, you know that while words are important, none of them do the job fully and complete. Now, however for us Christians, Jesus of Nazareth is a very special Word of God. We believe that in this human being, this Jew, born some 2000 years ago, we believe that there in this man we encounter the reality of God in a very special (and) distinctive way. A way that once we relate to it and get in touch with it, can illuminate and transform our lives.

So in other words, for me, the Word of God embodied in Jesus of Nazareth is true. Based on my experience, I can say this is God's, truly, this is God's Word. But, now Seth, this gets to be a little more dicey part if I may put it this way because it here it challenges traditional Christian thinking. But while I would say that Jesus is truly the Word of God, I would not say, because of what I've learned from Jesus, that he is the only Word of God. I do believe both on the basis of what I hear in the Bible, but also Seth on the basis of what I have seen in the world of other religions. Buddhism, especially, but also in Islam and Hinduism and of course, Judaism, I see God's Word in other religions as well. Very different words. Sometimes words that might be in tension with the word God and Jesus, but ultimately I see them as complimentary to each other, able to enrich each other.

So this and this, I think that Seth, is the challenge that we Christians, I think are facing today. How to be fully committed to God's revelation in Jesus, to God's Word in and through Jesus, and at the same time to be open to what God's might be speaking to us, in other faiths.

So for me, I love this expression, I think it's in the book somewhere, and I'll shut up then so you can ask some questions. (Laughter from Seth)

But for me, one of the most beautiful descriptions of who Jesus is, for us Christians, is formulated by a friend of mine, a theologian John Cobb “Jesus is the way that is open to other ways”. Jesus is the way, for me, the way that is open to other ways. I think that that for me kind of describes how Jesus has enriched my life, given me a grounding and ability to experience a God of love and the God of justice. And at the same time called me to be open, critically open, not just you know, empty mindedly open, critically open but genuinely open to other to other ways to other religions.

Seth Price 36:35

Yeah. So what's funny is another question that I got is from someone you may know, and I can tell you after the fact I don't want to put them on blast on the show. But so when I hear you talking, and I get it often as well, I find that I'm not able to grow spiritually if I'm not skirting at not a constant level, but at some intentionally repetitive level, dogmas or doctrines that some would view heretical. And so when I hear you saying that, you know, they're Truths, big “T” Truths, in other faiths and Christians shouldn't be so arrogant as to think that they have the world lock and key that at least for the Protestant Bible, these few books they got it all that orthodox Bible is wrong because Maccabees we all know is not inspired. I say that hypothetically, I like Maccabees. (laughs from Paul)

Um, so what do you say when you know, because if I talk to people here, you know, in Central Virginia and be like, Seth, like, you have gone off your rocker!

Paul Knitter 37:33

You can’t say that at church!!

Seth Price 37:35

Yeah, absolutely! Yeah, Jesus is pretty clear. I'm the only one and everyone else is wrong. And as you alluded to, at the beginning, if you don't fit into this small little thimble of people, you're not making it, because you just don't understand why you don't understand. And so how do I how do I both honor learn from but not degrade Christianity when I'm mixing in with other faiths? Because what you'll hear is people saying that you know, will you're lukewarm or you're watering it down or you don't stand for anything Seth! Like you kind of like Jesus, but you're having a love affair with all of these other religions, which I would argue, sure…maybe. Maybe I also have an issue with using lukewarm that way. But that's an entirely different podcast episode for Revelation. But what would you say to someone? Like how do I, if I'm just asking like, how do I continue to skirt the edges of what some would view is heretical? Although what I would call heresy, someone else would call doctrine and what they would call heresy. I might would call it doctrine. Luther was a heretic for the longest time until he wasn't; what 12-15 years ago. I think the Pope then rescinded it. So for 500 years, roughly, he was a heretic.

So how do I do that and do it well? And do it in such a way that I'm not judging the other faith. And I'm not also just leeching truths and then somehow making it my own but not giving any humility or honor to the other portions of those faiths?

Paul Knitter 38:58

Right, right. And, you know, it’s tricky but it's it's excitingly tricky. Tou know, it's delightfully tricky, namely, how to be faithful to the witness that we have, and to the truth that we have, in Jesus and then to be open to other religions without, as you just said, diluting or watering down the truth in Jesus? Now there's no easy answer to that, all that I might say right now is that there are truths that I have come to experience through Jesus that I cannot give up and I won't give up. And when I encounter another religion that contradicts that I want to be open to what they're saying and why they're saying it and what the historical context is. But if in the end, there is a contradiction, my fidelity is to Jesus. Not because I signed on the bottom line and I can't do it. No! Because I find his truth to be real.

Now, but I must say, Seth, that most of these kind of contradictory differences between Christian views and views in other religions seem to be on the ethical level, not so much on the doctrinal level.

You know, what I mean is that there are some, Hindus for instance, who would say that something like the caste system is inherent to Hinduism. And that that's what Hinduism requires. And they will try to, you know, try to explain that to me in a way in which it doesn't seem so oppressive to others. They've never succeeded in showing me how it's not oppressive. But on that issue, I say sorry, but no. There's no way.

Now let's take another contradiction, but this is more doctrinal, between Christianity and Islam, where Christianity says that we believe in one God, who is also triune. That there are differences within God. And we talk about we try to describe those differences. You know, as God as ground or Father, God as revealer, you know, or Son where God is sanctifier and Spirit. And the Muslims, they say, No! One God! Any kind of talk of a multiplicity in God is wrong. Let's talk about that. Let's talk about that. Because I think there, and I have engaged Muslims on this issue. And we have really found a great point of agreement, you know, where I've been able to explain how we're still holding on to the oneness of God. And they have explained that they are open to recognize a certain multiplicity in God. Insofar as, I’m just giving an example, they talk about the 99 names of God, which really talk about real differences in who God is.

Well, bingo! We’ve got some points for dialogue there. You know, we say three, you say 99. Let's talk.

Seth Price 42:48

Yeah. If you look at it that way, or frame it that way. We only went with three you went with 99!

Paul Knitter 42:56

(Chuckles) And then the Hindus come along and they say 33 million!

Seth Price 43:01

Yeah, which statistically 33 million versus 3, we might as well just be one. Um, I want to end with two things. So often, I don't talk about practice. And so for people A: if you're listening, go buy the book, it is not expensive. I'll link to it in the show notes. And when you get to the chapter on Jesus, I think it's chapter five. Paul, I'll be real honest, I haven't made it past chapter five, which is why some of these topics are all about just the first portion of the book because I've read that chapter six times, and I still wrestle with it. But I always laugh out loud at the Rahner quote, where you quote Rahner saying

most Christians think that Jesus is just God in a man suit.

Yeah, I literally burst out loud every time I read it. But chapter five is really doing a number on me.

Paul Knitter 43:48

Wow. Thank you. Thank you.

Seth Price 43:49

Yes, I don't know what chapter six says. I haven't gotten there yet. Because I need to deal with this first. I just know the way my brain works. So what are some practices that those listening that maybe of any walk of faith, or maybe they don't have faith at all, maybe they want to try something, just to try to become a better person. What are some of those practices that you've gleaned from Buddhism that we could install, either in our Sunday worship, or in our prayer life at home, or in the way that we treat the others? Like, what are some concrete practices? And then kind of where are some resources to, at a topical level, kind of learn how to do this and if we're going to do it, at least try to do it with intentionality?

Unknown 44:31

Yeah. No very, I think helpful and fruitful, questions Seth.

On the level of our churches, of our congregations, one of the things that I talk about in the chapter on spirituality. I think the title is, Prayer and Meditation is, I think, that we Christians, and I'm Roman Catholic and so I'm more acquainted with Roman Catholic liturgy, although I taught at Union Theological Seminary and I attended Protestant services every day when I was there. But I think all of us we’re much too wordy. We make too much noise, during excuse me put it that way, during our services. Whether it's singing or preaching or reading and listen, singing, preaching, reading is essential. We need more time for silence.

Together, silence together, in our services. I talked about it in the book as you Protestants need another sacrament. We Catholics need another sacrament. For you Protestants it'll be number three. For us. Catholics will be number eight. But it'll be the sacrament of silence. And I really think silence is a sacrament.

I mean, sacraments mean these are our external actions, pouring water, breaking bread by which we come to experience the presence of the Divine. Silence is a practice by which we can experience the presence of the Divine. So that would be a recommendation and I've seen some Christian services in India and in Sri Lanka, by Catholic friends of mine, where the Catholic Eucharist embodies Buddhist and Hindu silence right into the time. And it's just, Seth, it's powerful. Yeah, it's powerful. Yeah, and another suggestion, this is more on the individual level and that would be, and there's a lot of talk about this nowadays and so I'm not saying anything that's terribly strange or new, but the way the Buddhists stress the importance of mindfulness, mindfulness.

Seth Price 47:10

And by that you mean what?

Paul Knitter 47:12

Well, first of all, this is a Buddhist act of faith. Buddhists tell us that if we are truly present to each individual moment of our lives, truly present, truly open to it, we will find all that we need to deal with whatever we have to deal with. If we are truly present to the moment, Seth, for me as a Christian they are talking about God's grace, always available—God’s grace. Now but they would say, in order to get in touch with it, this is mindfulness, just stop and recognize your thinking recognize the feelings that you have. And don't let the thought think you and don't let the feeling possess you. But you be aware of your thought and let it go. Be aware of your feeling, whether it's anger, whether it's despondency, whether it's discouragement, recognize it, let it go and just be open to the moment.

There is power in the moment. God has always excuse me, I’ll use a Christian term, God's grace is always present right now. The problem is we're not present right now. And that's what mindfulness is, is enabling us to be present to trust, to trust, that right in this moment, no matter what, there is that which is holding me and sustaining me.

Seth Price 48:48

I wonder if mindfulness has become so more talked about and that's a bad sentence but…

Paul Knitter 48:58

No you’re right! You’re right!

Seth Price 49:00

Because just even if I think back in I'm not that old. But growing up, if I wanted to be distracted, I had to plan to be distracted, I had to make plans to be with my friends or make plans to read a book or make plans to watch a movie. Because shoot just dating myself a bit. It was expensive to get a VHS player much less of VHS. And cable wasn't a thing, at least not where I'm from. I had a UHF/VHF Zenith that you had to tick, tick, tick, tick, tick the things on. But now I can easily, without even trying, be distracted. And so I don't think that as a generation, at least not mine, which is now the biggest generation on the planet, not just in this country, all of them. We don't know how to not be distracted. We operate at a level of always doing four things at once. And I would argue we're uncomfortable with not having constant input. But we don't listen to, at least me, I often don't listen to any of the input. And I know I would tell you at work, I don't work well if there's too much silence, like I need two to three inputs that I can filter subconsciously, to focus on the one that matters.

And so like when I do contemplative prayer or Lectio Divina or something it's really hard. Because I'm still not comfortable with silence. I know one of the things our current minister had installed when he first came is a discipline of silence at the end of each service. And each week, he stretched it out a little further. And obviously, there's some of that worked in sometimes it's shorter if we have to dedicate a baby or you know, that type of stuff. But I can tell you so many people in the hallways that say that that is their most holy part of the service now.

Paul Knitter 50:30

Wow! Looks at that!

Seth Price 50:32

Like I look forward to sitting here at that. Yeah. And that's just three years later, two years later, but it was wholly new. And I remember him preface it saying, this is going to be uncomfortable, but go with me, and it's going to be uncomfortable. But because I'm helping lead worship at the search service, I don't really get to partake in that because that's when I have to get up, get ready to go back on the stage and do the music. So, for me, I have to do it at home, but I don't think that my generation even knows how to be silent and I don't know that we will without expressly intending to do so. But to do so, then makes the rest of the world feel like there's something wrong with us. Like, why did they disengage? Did I offend them? Did I do this? Did I not check my “whatever”?

Paul Knitter 51:10

Well, I just would, you know, the congregational level, so important. But on the individual level, just encourage your listeners, our listeners, you know, just to experiment with 5 to 10 minutes in the morning, if possible, in the morning, where you just sit, maybe with a cup of coffee in silence, and try just to observe your thoughts and let them go and just sit. And I'm talking to Christians, I'll just sit in the Divine Presence. Just sit in the presence. Don't try to think about it or understand. Just sit in the in Divine Presence.

There's a form Christian practice called Centering Prayer. Centering Prayer can be a wonderful Christian way of doing this kind of meditation. I would really, really urge it and a resource. We talked about some resources. Yeah. Check out some of the writings on centering prayer by Thomas Keating, who died recently. And Cynthia Bourgeault can be very, very helpful, I think.

Seth Price 52:29

Absolutely. Well, Paul, I’ve got to end our time because we both have other commitments. So thank you. It is honestly it was a privilege to talk with. I've really enjoyed it.

Paul Knitter 52:41

Oh, it was the delight. Thank you.

Seth Price 52:43

I'm really enjoying wrestling with the book even though I usually try to finish these books before I talk to someone but I, I have to be genuine and I can't get past chapter five. Oddly enough, when you talked about prayer and meditation as a possible response to my question when I said that, that's chapter six. I went to the table of contents. And so yeah, maybe that's my impatientness bleeding through but

Paul Knitter 53:00

Skip chapter five, skip chapter five and jump to chapter six.

Seth Price 53:03

Come back to it. So where would you point people to either in engage with you to get in touch with you? Obviously, I'll have links to everything to you in the show notes. But where would you direct people to?

Paul Knitter 53:15

Well, I mean, I guess the easiest way would be just, you know, through email. That would be I really don't keep up on I don't have a website. I should, but I don't. But should there be questions or so I mean, I'd be glad to to as much as time allows to carry on further conversations that way.

Seth Price 53:35

What's that email address if you're willing to put it out there?

Paul Knitter 53:37

Simple it to remember is Paul@Paulknitter.com

Seth Price 53:49

Fantastic well thank you again, genuinely have enjoyed it. Honestly, though, we could probably talk for hours I didn't cover half of the things that I wanted to ask you about, but that's okay. That's entirely okay. But thank you again, I'd love to if time allows some time in the future. I'd love to have you back on maybe

Paul Knitter 54:05

Certainly; when you finish the book!

Seth Price 54:07

Fair enough.

Seth Price 54:21

Religion and faith is an adventure. It's a call to new things. It's a call to stretch ourselves and to learn what is true. To learn things that make us more whole. Paul's book does that. I wanted to leave you with this.

May your search for peace and knowledge and compassion and an understanding of faith leave you with wisdom and radiating warmth as you're held by our Creator. By the Divine God. By love.

Music today featured is from artist Ryan Ellis. You'll find links to him in the show notes and you'll find today's tracks listed below as well in the show notes on the Spotify playlist for Can I Say This At Church. I'll speak with you all next time.

Be blessed everyone.

What is the Bible with Dr. Tim Mackie / Transcript

Note: Can I Say This at Church is produced for audio listening. If able, I strongly encourage you to listen to the audio, which has inflection, emotion, sarcasm where applicable, and emphasis for points that may not come across well in written word. This transcript is generated using a combination of my ears and software, and may contain errors. Please check the episode for clarity before quoting in print.

Back to the Audio Episode


Tim Mackie 0:00 

I really do think there is something unified, in particular about the collection that also is called the Protestant Old Testament, but Jesus called it the Torah, the prophets and the Psalms. So I actually think that collection is actually tight. It's been woven together. That's a particular part of the forest that has-that's all connected in a really important way and respect the integrity of that. However, that part of the forest gave birth to a whole bunch of other stuff that will help us to understand that core part of the forest really well. And so, yeah, I mean, it wasn't until post Gutenberg, so the printing press, and then some Protestants, because of the Protestant-Catholic debates that were beginning to get really fierce in the late 1500s and early 1600s. It wasn't until the early 1600s that you had Bibles being created without the deuterocanon or the Apocrypha, so just like let that register. For three quarters of church history Christians have been exposed to the core part of the Old Testament and the literature the grew up around it.  

Seth Price 1:39 

At the beginning of last year, on the honest discussions Facebook group, I had asked some people, Hey, what would you want me to talk about? What are some questions that you have? What are some things about the Bible that just don't make sense to you? 

The canon of Scripture came up a lot over and over and via text messages and with some close friends just the canon like why These books. Why are my books different? What does this matter? Was this just some thing that got put together accidentally, haphazardly? Was tied to Empire? Like, why these books? And what do these books have to say to you and I? I'm Seth, you're listening to the Can I Say This At Church podcast, and today I spoke with Dr. Tim Mackie. If you are not familiar with Tim Mackie, you'll hear me reference online a lot, but also in just in person, like, I like The Bible project. They have a reading app, they have all these YouTube videos. But what they do have as well is the Bible broken into bite sized pieces in a way that I can understand them, and in a way that my children can understand them. And that's a big thing to hit both sides. 

One of my favorite things about Tim is (that) he just has a humility and a patience of answering questions from people like myself. So here we are, Tim and I talking about why the Bible is the way that it is. Why it's these books? Why aren't there other books? And if there are, what does that look like? When we talk about the Bible what is the narrative pushing us towards? So here we go a conversation about the Bible with Tim Mackie.  Unknown

Seth Price 3:47

Tim Mackie, I'm excited that you're here excited to see your face big fan. And after all these months of planning, I'm glad that we're finally able to get you on and when I say we, I mean me. We'll use the queenly we but welcome to the show, man.  

Tim Mackie 4:02 

Yeah, thank you, Seth, it’s good to talk with you. 

Seth Price 4:04 

I always take a few minutes at the beginning of each episode, just in case anyone is unfamiliar with you. And so the other day, I actually put it on Facebook. I was like, Hey, I'll be talking to Tim Mackie on this. Does anybody have any questions, but I had a lot of people say, I don't know who that is? To which I said Google it and they were like, yes. I don't know who that is. In a nutshell, what would you say it is? That is you like what makes Tim…Tim and then kind of what do you do, where you coming from?  

Tim Mackie 4:30 

Yeah, um, let's see. Okay. Um, I live in Portland, Oregon. And I am a professor of seminary here in Portland. called Western Seminary. I teach Biblical Studies. And I've been serving as a pastor mostly in teaching, and teaching theology and adult education at churches for the last decade or so. Let's see and then about five years ago, a friend and I started a nonprofit animation studio making short explainer videos about Biblical theology, themes in the Bible, books of the Bible. And that's gained a lot of momentum. It's called the Bible project. And we're YouTube educational channel. That's like where we live on the interweb. And, so yeah, we release short animated videos that are not for kids, though kids do enjoy them. But they're really aimed at adults trying to demystify the main themes and the books of the Bible and where it came from and how it works and so on. So that's what I'm doing full time now is working with The Bible Project.  

Seth Price 5:44 

Do you miss teaching, although I would argue, I watch a lot of those videos, that it is teaching but it's a different type of…there’s less interaction, unless you want to go into the comments which it's the internet so you don't want to do that. Do you miss that portion?  

Tim Mackie 5:59 

Well, Still do quite a bit of teaching. I'm still on like part time at Western. But I just do one class a year. And actually one of the projects we're doing with The Bible Project now, we're still a pilot project it'll release in early 2020 is going to be classes. So actually we have such a large support base now that I'm just teaching the classes that I would teach at Western seminary, but teaching them at The Bible Project for small groups of our supporters. And then we're filming those and then we're gonna start releasing free grad graduate level Bible classes on our website. Which I'm thrilled about that is actually my favorite in environment.  

Seth Price 6:43 

Well, I'm also thrilled about that. Yeah, the video of yours and then I'll get to what I really wanted to have you on about the video of yours that I referenced people to the most often is and it's recent. I think it's from this season. I say season because isn't this, it was September of last year, when you… October

Tim Mackie 7:00 

That’s right we are in our fifth season of videos.  

Seth Price 7:02 

You know, I'm not making it up because I actually know the dates. You, did like the Trinity, and you're trying to explain like dimensions and how you can only see different portions at one time. And I'm badly explaining this. And so I'll put it in the show notes, because it's an eight minute video that I struggle to explain. That's one of my favorites, because the topic is the topic is dense. The animation is good. And the content is good.  

Tim Mackie 7:28 

That's great. I'm glad. Yeah, we have added yet another inadequate analogy to the history of people trying to explain God's identity. (laughter) Just a helpful inadequate analogy that helped me take a step further.

Seth Price 7:43 

It's helpful though, because most analogies I can't explain without saying, you know, picture this and this and this and then this, it's at least a physical analogy. So I can I could break it down. Even if I have props on a bed with a sheet for my kids. You know, it's an analogy that actually can touch. So at least for me, I remember.

Tim Mackie 8:05 

What you are referring to is imagine you're a two dimensional person and a three dimensional object appeared to you, it would seem impossible. Then we say, perhaps God is a, like a multi dimensional type of reality and us poor little 3d creatures it just breaks our categories. Anyway, I'm just trying to summarize for your listeners.

Seth Price 8:27 

Well, I will link to it. But also just picture you and I are three dimensional and we're reading the book Flat Stanley with your kids. And if you don't have kids, and you do one day we will just make it theology and…

Tim Mackie 8:36 

I love Flat Stanley!

Seth Price 8:37 

I wanted to talk to you about the canon because I get questions and emails often about people of when will you talk about “this” and so on my list we were talking a minute ago. Yeah, sure. Like I I do want to talk about the Solas specifically and rip them apart, and just other portions of the Bible. But a big portion, and a lot of understanding that has come to me, is the Bible that I have isn't necessarily the same Bible that you might have on that bookshelf behind you, or the Bible, that Catholic Church down the street may have, like the Bibles are different. And so when we talk about that we're talking about the canon. And that in itself needs a definition of what the Canon is. And so I thought I would start with an easy question of when I say the Bible.

Tim Mackie 9:27

Yeah.

Seth Price 9:28

What am I saying? Like, what does that even mean?  

Tim Mackie 9:29 

Yes. Well, it turns out that the answer to that question is not simple. (laughter)

And just that, that simple fact, is worth just letting it register. Yeah, when people say the Bible, that's shorthand for a whole bunch of things that need to be said really quickly. (laughter)

So first, let's just start with I go to the bookstore, you know, and I encounter a Bible what that means for a modern person saying that is I see a whole bunch of thin, usually really like low quality onion paper, thin pages bound between like plastic, cheap leather or something like that. And it has Holy Bible written on it. So I'm making fun of the poor quality of most Bibles. So that technology, which is called a Codex, which is like two covers with the back binding and a bunch of individual pages, you know, stitched or glued together. That's a really old technology. But the Bible is actually older than that technology.

So that's called the Codex form, man that came into prominence in the 1st through 3rd centuries after Jesus. The Bible, at least three quarters of the Bible, that the Christians called the Old Testament, is way older than that. And before that form it didn't ever exist all in one bound form it existed on scrolls, individual scrolls that could not fit everything. It was a collection of scrolls. So even by using the singular noun, “the Bible”, that's actually not ever what Jesus or the Apostles called their Bible. They called it the Scriptures, The Writings, or Jesus will refer to as a three part collection. We call it the Torah, the Prophets, and the Psalms, or later in Jewish tradition called the Torah and prophets and writings.

So that's the first like leap we have to do is to say that the Scriptures were a collection of literature that was considered by devout Jews, before Jesus, to be the product of a human and divine partnership. And what's fascinating and what's gonna throw all of us for a loop is that Jewish communities, before Jesus, didn't seem to—because you didn't have to come binding it—they didn't have a lot of debates or hang ups about what exact books were “in” and what books might be related but not necessarily apart and what books are definitely not apart but really cool and that you should read them, because they're all in individual scrolls. And so there's a blurriness to the boundaries of this collection that's very ancient. And that resulted in different Christians, once the Jesus movement launches, you have different groups with different views about what should be in the collection.

And that's why you go to the bookstore today, and you'll see a Bible that has 66 books, or you'll go and you'll see what's called a Catholic Bible, they'll have something called the Apocrypha or the Deuterocanon and that'll have some more literature.

So let me just pause. So that sounds terrifying to people who have grown up in Protestant tradition. And I understand that, my Christian faith has all been nurtured in that tradition too, and I'm proudly a Protestant. But it's a historical fact that we have to recognize that the Bible has taken multiple shapes in different communities throughout its history. And we need to honor I actually think we need to honor that fact.  

Seth Price 13:23 

What do you mean honor? 

Tim Mackie 13:26 

I think it tells us something beautiful, about how God has chosen to work in history. But there's nothing to be scared of here. That's my point. We need to honor it and let incorporate that fact into our view of what what the Bible is how it came into existence, because that was kind of a longish. Maybe that’s too long answer, but it opens up many cans of worms that I'm happy to maybe pull some of them out. I have many worms.

Seth Price 13:55 

Something that I latched on to there, you said that you know in a more ancient context, there wasn't this…what's the right word? There wasn't as much nuance around “No, this book is ‘in’ and this book is not ‘in’, this book isn't ‘in’, this book is ‘not’.” And you said they didn't argue as much about it as what we would. So why was their lack of importance? Was it I don't know how to read? Like, what is it?  

Tim Mackie 14:17 

It has to do with what these texts are about, and how and why they came into existence in the first place. So maybe one metaphor would help. I think many of us come, and I'm just right now I'm just talking about first three quarters, the Bible, the Hebrew Scriptures—the Old Testament; that's all I'm talking about right now. Many of us think about that these books came into existence in a similar way that if like you went to like a garden nursery, and you go out to like the outdoor part of the nursery, and you go to like the tree section. And, you know, they're all like, potted. They're in these big plastic pots. Some of them are small. Some of them are big Maybe they they're a little older, but they're all self contained and independent. And they are scooched together in like groups, you know, here's the Poplars and here's the Pine.

And so many of us think about the books of the Bible, and again, it's because the way we encounter them…here was where Exodus begins, “oh, there's like a blank white page between that and Genesis. Well, that must be a separate book. Now I'm in a different book”. And right, or I'm in the book of Joel, and we call them books, which makes us think of different author they have different some of them have different names. And so we think they have in independent origins and existence and so on. Just like those trees, all are independent and not connected to each other.

However, if you pay really close attention to what the books themselves, within the Bible, tell us about how they came into existence they give us a very different story. And then when you pay attention into the manuscript history, of these texts, they give us a different story. They give us a story that's much more like you go out backpacking. And you go maybe to Colorado, and you go into a grove of Aspen trees. And Aspen trees are awesome, because a whole forest can grow up of dozens 100, a 1000 trees, and they're all connected as one organism. They're all genetically connected. And some of them are taller, some of them are bigger. Some of them have branches going, you know, they look different above the surface, but they're all deeply interconnected. And they all begin from the same root. And, that is much more of the process of how this literature came into existence.

So, just think of steps here. Stuff happened. There's this family connected to Abraham, and crazy stuff happened to them, you know, just crazy stuff happened. And they have an encounter with the God who reveals himself as YHWH (YAHWEH). I mean, just read the stories that are in the Bible. Abraham is on the scene somewhere in the 17 1800s BC, I mean, the alphabet is just being invented at that point in history, you know, like, nobody knows how to read and write, except paid Egyptian scribes who can spend their lives learning hieroglyphics and stuff like that. So the alphabet is just being invented. So we have a long period of the family of Abraham where their history is being preserved orally, through oral traditions, which is still true in many cultures today. And so for generations, that's how these events, and memories, are being preserved about their family.

Moses, it's not till you get to Moses, that you get the first mentioned of the writing of the Bible in the Bible, and it's where he's at Mount Sinai. And it is where God appears in the smoke and fire and 10 commandments and God makes a covenant. That's the first time in writing that God is mentioned in the Bible, which I think is fascinating. So then, so it all revolves around Moses. And then for Moses, he's, you know, a part of this family. So you have to imagine he's inheriting all of this oral history. He's committing to writing many of the things that are in what we call the first five books of the Bible, but he's not writing all of it. He certainly didn't write the last chapter of Deuteronomy, because it says “and no one knows where Moses is buried to this today.”

Seth Price 18:39 

Yeah. Including including me, Moses!  

Tim Mackie 18:44 

Yeah!

So, clearly, even the books where Moses appears, were shaped by people after Moses. The last chapter tells you that and so this is what I mean in terms of the forest. So if you go into Aspen forest, the tallest trees in the stand are the Moses trees. And they're connected to the first five books of the Bible. And then for Moses, Moses’ whole thing was "Man, these people don't really want to follow the God who rescued them out of Egypt". He wants to bless all of the nations through them. They are not very good at following him”.

And so what you have throughout Israel's history is a minority of leaders who are faithful to the God who rescued them out of slavery in Egypt. Most Israelites want to be Canaanites and Babylonians and follow other gods and so on. And so the whole complex history of Israel, you have a minority view, a minority report, of prophets, of priests, of some Kings, who want to follow the God of Abraham. And that's where the Bible comes from. It's from this minority group within ancient Israel. And they come to be called The Prophets and they are both shaping this family history and it's also coming into existence, and new books are being added and written, but it's all happening in this minority group within ancient Israel. And so you get to like the famous stories of Elijah, or the prophet Jeremiah, or Ezekiel, I mean, people hate these guys. Nobody wants to listen to them! And they're the ones who are protecting and cherishing these traditions in these texts throughout history, this small group of prophets.

And so, something really important happened when Israel went into the exile in Babylon. Babylon came to Jerusalem (and) took thousands of Israelites as slaves in Babylon. And something happened there were the final like forest, there was a burn in the Aspen forest, and it burned all the trees at the same time. And then they all started regrowing from that root. And then when they're regrowing, they're totally interconnected. And so this is why the collection that we call the Old Testament is like reading Wikipedia pages that are all hyperlinked to each other. They're constantly quoting and interconnected and they're actually growing and coming into their shape that we know them as at the same time.  

Seth Price 21:13 

Yeah.

That leads me to a question that someone had asked. So he specifically talks about the Babylonian exile. And so what he said was, he's like, do we know if there was a Jewish canon before the Babylonian exile? And then how do we know what the Hebrew Bible consisted of, you know, during the years of exile to the Septuagint?  

Tim Mackie 21:32

Yeah, yeah, we have no idea. (laughter) What we have is what we can read about in the Hebrew Bible. And this is tricky, because even saying the Jewish Bible the story the Old Testaments telling us is that most Israelites for most of their history could have cared less about the Bible. They could have cared less about the tradition of Moses and following God of Abraham  

Seth Price 21:59 

Would be the case for the New Testament Christians following you know “the way” of Christ with with those early early, you know, the church fathers would they also have, quote unquote, you know, cared less about the Bible. Because the reason I asked that is, I often get told the, you know, this this Bible is I don't hold him to an inerrant view, at least not the way that most people mean the word “literally” inerrant. There's just too much, going back through the, from what, from the minimal amount of research that I'm able to understand that I do. You know, there there are parts where people will, you know, change things and add things and stuff that were in the margins on this manuscript that now get moved over into the Bible on this manuscript, and then we take it from there. So did the early Christians have that same, I guess, lack of not lack of regard but lack of sterility?  

Tim Mackie 22:51

Well, let's pause. Let's pause on the New Testament for the moment.  

Seth Price 22:54

How dare you. (in jest)

Tim Mackie 22:56

For me, it's helpful to really keep things separate in the pre-Jesus phase of the story. But what we can say is that however the Bible comes into existence, it comes into existence over a long period of time, with lots of people involved. Not just the main characters that are named in story, but a whole crew of unnamed scribes and prophets that claim that God is using them to produce these texts so that what these texts are communicating is what God wants his people to hear. Now you can reject or accept that claim, but that is the claim that this literature makes about itself. And I'm inclined to accept that claim, because I'm a follower of Jesus. And that's what Jesus thought about the Hebrew Scriptures.

So at some point in the late post exilic period we're talking like the 300-200 AD, you've got the base collection that Jesus is referring to call the Torah, the Prophets, and the Writings, and it corresponds to the Protestant Old Testament. However, what Jewish scholars and scribes continued to do was to read and reflect and to produce new texts. And there's a whole body of literature that's wonderful and fascinating. It's called Second Temple Jewish literature, sometimes called the Apocrypha and Psuedopigrapha. And what these texts are doing is it's like it's those remix phase. Every single one of them are producing remixes of the Scriptures, for a new audience and for a new day. And they do it in very creative ways. So you'll get a book like Judith, which is in the Catholic deuterocanon and Judith is the prophetess, Deborah, and David, and Elijah, and Daniel, all mixed into one character. And she overcomes by prayer and a clever plan she overcomes bad guys who represent Babylon and Assyria and Persian all in one character.

In other words, Judith is a work of Biblical theology. It shows us an ancient Jewish reader of the Bible, who's bringing together the themes of the Bible by creating a brand new text. And that's what I mean about the blurry boundaries. The books in the Catholic deuterocanon, there's nothing Catholic about them. They're just ancient Jewish literature that was inspired by the Bible. So this is going back to what I mean; ancient Jews didn't have the hang ups that we do about a book like Judith...is it in the collection is out of the collection. It's awesome. It's what it is.

And all it is is a remix of stories that are in the primary collection, namely, what Protestants called the Old Testament. So that's what I mean, I think the forest metaphor is helpful is to say there is a real center of the forest. It's what Protestants called the Old Testament. But that forest gave birth to lots of other texts that are close, really close, in time to the final formation of the Old Testament. And we don't need to make a decision is it part of the collection, is it not? It's inspired by it, and it can give us insight into the Core Collection. And to me, what really opened my eyes to this was Jesus and the Apostles are familiar, not just with what we call the Old Testament, but they're familiar with the whole forest. And they actually, the Apostles and Jesus, will quote from and allude and borrow language from the literature and the whole forest, not just in the Old Testament.

And once I realized that I was like, “Oh, I'm asking the wrong set of questions when I'm saying is something ‘in’ is something ‘out’ at a certain stage.” At a later stage is it ‘in’ or is it ‘out’ becomes important for the New Testament? It's a little bit different. But for the Old Testament, the Aspen forest metaphor has been really helpful for me.

Seth Price 27:11

Then building off of that to the New Testament. Which I know, I feel like I know more about the New Testament, but probably because growing up in a Protestant based church, we only we only talk about mostly Paul, and then every once in a while something else and then back to Paul, and then something gets in the back of Paul.  

Yeah, one of the favorite books that I read last year is by Robbie Williamson out of Arkansas, he wrote a book The Forgotten Books of the Bible, and it's Song of Songs and Esther and Ecclesiastes. Like the books that we just don't talk about, because we just don't preach on these. And so don't forget, yeah, these books have purpose, and they have meaning and they have reasons to be here. And they're instructive, specifically Ecclesiastes, like the way he ripped it apart. But I've rabbit trailed. So how then did we get to where we're at now, where if it's not the 66, like, how do we get to pick and choose. And I guess more specifically, who gets to vote? Who is at CBS, you know, running the survivor show of the canon of you're voted off the island, you're not voted on the island. And another question specifically is, is there any matriarchal voice in that?

Tim Mackie 28:22

Oh interesting.

Seth Price 28:23

Which was a question that repeatedly came to me. Is this all from a voice of a male or does that? Is that even a good question? Or is there any Is there any female voice involved in that, that has maybe been suppressed? Or is it just “No”, not that there was no female voice? How does all those voices combined? And kind of how were they weighed and measured for their qualifications? And then what is the “Nope, you are black balled off the island? Get out of this Bible.”  

Tim Mackie 28:41 

So I know you said we're gonna move on to the New Testament, but I'm not. I'm going to go back for a second. (laughter)

So when it comes to the Hebrew Scriptures for me, the reason that I read those texts, isn't because I just find ancient Hebrew literature interesting, although now I do but most people don’t. The reason I read that is because I follow Jesus. And Jesus explained who he was in the light of the story that those texts are telling.

I mean, he actually made it so clear that if you don't understand these texts, you don't understand him or anything he's saying. What he says is often so cryptic, it's like, watching the third Lord of the Rings movie, without even knowing that movies one and two exists. It's just like, it's absurd. And that's it's very, very similar. So when I look at the patterns of how Jesus and his followers that he deputized, called the Apostles, when I look at what they're reading and what they appeal to the most, what they appeal to are the books that are in what's called the Protestant Old Testament. They never quote from the other Jewish texts in the same way they'll borrow language about phrases, but they don't quote from in the in way that “this is what the Scriptures say” that kind of thing. So to me that's significant.

I want to read the whole forest of literature, but I care about these specific texts, is what Jesus means when it talks about the Torah and the prophets. Okay.

So Jesus comes onto the scene, and more crazy stuff happens, right? Just like with Abraham, and so on. So, Jesus does what he does, he makes a claim that the whole storyline of God and Israel, as its interpreted in the Scriptures is coming to fulfillment in him through his death and his resurrection. However, Jesus is just one guy in one place. And so what he does, even just a year or so into the kingdom of God movement, is that he starts, he appoints or deputized his circle of close followers, disciples, that he's training and they're following him everywhere. They're memorizing his teachings, he gives them the same spiritual power and authority that he has. And so we call these the 12 or the you know, the disciples that come to be called the Apostles.

So there's an important move there for the origins of the New Testament, what we call the New Testament is that Jesus deputized a circle, a small circle, but a circle of people to represent him to represent his teachings, to go be his voice, and presence, in a place where he couldn't go. That's why he would send them out on trips, and then they would come back to him. And you can read this, Matthew 10, and so on.

So, in a way, what's happening there is the key seed being planted for what we call the New Testament. It's the circle of (the) closest followers of Jesus, who are authorized by him, and empowered by him to represent him to groups that Jesus Himself wouldn't ever go to. And so once Jesus is executed, and then he's seen alive again, what we have in the four accounts in the New Testament of the Gospels are different ways that different moments, especially in Matthew, Luke, and John, where we have memories preserved of how Jesus commissioned these people to go now represent him out to Israel, to the nation's, and so on. And so in a way, the New Testament is just an outworking of that commission.

So the 27 books that are in our current New Testament are the oldest Christian literature. They're the oldest. And they're the books that claim both most within themselves, and people debate about circumstantial evidence around them, but nobody debates that they're the oldest texts. There are lots of other early Christian texts, and some of them were really popular. And some of them people tried to make arguments for like this should be in the core collection of Christian literature. But what we have in these 27 texts…and here is what we have well, there's another question!!…but to me that that was a helpful concept when I was introduced to it just let to let that register. Jesus commission, a group of people to represent him. What these texts are the earliest Christian texts that stem back from that circle of people that he commissioned to represent him.  

Seth Price 33:20

Where were you about to go?

Tim Mackie 33:23

Oh, where I was about to go was to say that all of the and I should put a footnote I have a lot more reading on, homework to do on, New Testament canon formation. But everything I've worked on up to this point, what later councils have like old men in white beards, you know, who are, you know, having debates and hired by Constantine and so on. None of these Councils, as I understand them, are deciding what's in the contents of the Bible. What they're doing is surveying “what are people reading”? What is the universal church practicing in its weekly worship? What are the texts that have risen to the top?

And what rises to the top are our 27, and then there's a handful of others that are really popular too. And so that's where the Shepherd of Hermas, what is called First Clement, it was a really important bishops. I mean, this is pretty small list actually.

But the debates aren't like, okay, they're not like the nursery, the garden nursery. Okay, we got a whole bunch of trees now which ones should we put in? My wonder, you know, well, I vote for this one. It was a groundswell. It was like YouTube. It was like the viral books are the ones that came from the earliest part of the movement and what those later councils are debating isn't what's ‘in’ and what's ‘out’; it's how do we bring together the church around this core collection of literature. And it was messy. I mean, this took many councils over many, many decades and a century or two, so I'm not trying to make it sound more tidy than it actually was.

But those two concepts are helpful for me. Jesus commissioned a group. These texts are the earliest ones that come from that group. And it took the church quite a while. It took the text a long time to spread also, you know? I mean, they didn't have the internet, they had the Roman roads, which were pretty darn awesome. But it might take many decades for the Gospel of Mark to make it to North Africa and to Greece and out to Asia or India. Stuff took a while, and so not everybody had the 27 books that we have, all in one place in those first centuries. They likely had a growing collection. 

Seth Price 36:30 

Because the name of the show is Can I Say This At Church, this might sound like an off-putting question, but it's genuinely the one that pops in my mind. So I hear you saying, you know, these people are talking about what is deeply impacting them, and that's honestly, I think this is why it would get so messy like if I have this book that is deeply helping me connect and hear God and, you know, do things that are fruitful. And then you want to tell me, you know, this other person that…no! There's not enough other people reading that it's obviously you're just too tertiary for us to include it in the core teachings. So that would get deeply personal the same way that the fact that the Cowboys can't win a playoff game that also gets deeper personal for me. I'm tired of the Patriots obviously. They're the viral, they're the cannon of the NFL for lack of a metaphor.  

Tim Mackie 37:14 

Yeah. So that's right. And and low grade stuff can rise to the top.  

Seth Price 37:21

Yeah. Nobody wants to Browns in the Canon. Yeah, except for the browns, go dog pack, or whatever they call themselves.

So is there a case to revisit that? Not that I necessarily want to, because these texts, I'll say, so one of my favorite versions of the Bible that I have is Bibliotheca. And I don't know if you've read that version of the Bible. Have you?

Tim Mackie 37:44

Yeah, the nice hand bound one, single column.

Seth Price 37:50

Yeah. But what I like is A: all the other texts that aren't in the normal Bible are there but B: they're not necessarily in the same order either. And so I see things differently, and then C: they I don't really they know when I start and stop. So someone we were talking about at the beginning, you know, if you just flip a page, there's blank space, and we've moved on. And so when I read the text that way, more narrative, yeah, I guess that's the best way to say it. It changes the text. And so is there a case to say, we should look at doing this again?

Like we should reevaluate and intentionally teach these other tests that we haven't taught in a while and see where the churches or is that an unfair question? 

Tim Mackie 38:29

Well, there's two questions. One is how do we respond to this particular; so again, I came to faith in the Protestant tradition. So I really do think there is something unified, and particular about the collection that also is called the Protestant Old Testament, but Jesus called it the Torah, the Prophets, and the Psalms. So I actually think that collection is actually tight. It's been woven together,

Seth Price 39:04

Leave it alone.

Tim Mackie 39:05

Well not leave it alone; but just, that's a particular part of the forest that's all connected in a really important way and respect the integrity of that. However, that part of the forest gave birth to a whole bunch of other stuff that will help us to understand that core part of the forest really well. And so, yeah, I mean, it wasn't until post Gutenberg, so the printing press, and then some Protestants, because of the Protestant Catholic debates that were beginning to get really fierce in the late 1500s and early 1600s. It wasn't until the early 1600s, that you had Bibles being created without the deuterocanon or the Apocrypha. So just like let that register. For three quarters of church history, Christians have I've been exposed to the core part of the Old Testament, and the literature that grew up around it.  

Seth Price 40:06 

That just makes me cynical, like why?  (laughter both)

Tim Mackie 40:09 

Well, I think it should just say like, this is the way history works. Yeah. And if we want to recover the whole literary tradition that the Old Testament gave birth to, um, we should, you should read this literature called the Apocrypha, because it's fascinating. It's really fascinating. And it enriches your reading of the Old Testament.

Jesus grew up knowing this literature. And the Apostles, including Paul, show that they have knowledge of this literature to, there's nothing threatening here. It's more that we need to just reframe our categories. When it comes to the New Testament. I do think the viral YouTube analogy does break down though because really bad videos can rise at the top. 

Seth Price 41:00

Fair enough. 

Tim Mackie 41:00

I mean, I think there's a handful of factors that work one is widespread popular. Another is the fact that these books were connected to that inner circle of Jesus, which is almost certainly why it was that they spread. You know, in Paul's letters, it's pretty obvious, you know, he writes his, his name at the beginning of them. The gospels are technically anonymous, like nowhere in the gospels do you get “Hey, I'm Matthew, here I am!”, but the traditions about them being connected to Matthew and John. Mark and Luke, were not a part of that 12 circle, but they were a part of this second generation who worked with the first crew, you know, and people debate those traditions, but I think there's good reason to take them at face value. So for me, again, just like there's a core to the Hebrew Scriptures. But I want to honor it, but also recognize that gave birth to a lot more. There's a core collection that is what we call the New Testament and that also gave birth to a circle of early Christian literature around it. That is really fascinating and important. And I don't personally treat it and engage it on the same level that I do, and with the same expectations, but I do think that I need to be familiar with it. Because most Christians, for most of church history, we're reading the whole forest, not just the core collections. So I'm not saying there isn't a core. I'm just saying the division between the core forest and the other trees that grew out of it was a lot less important for most of earlier generations of church history.  

Seth Price 42:51 

Yeah. And so I'll stretch your forest metaphor a little bit further because I've been thinking about it in the back of my brain. I live at the edge of the Shenandoah National Forest and then the other edge is the George Washington National Forest like right where the two intersect here in Appalachia. And so I know as you hike into the forest, it grows more and more and more dense. And more and more quiet, I guess is a good word. But I think quiet is a good way to think about meditating on Scripture. But as you enter, there's civilization there and things that don't necessarily push against you. And the closer that you get to the core there's more brambles; there's more overgrowth, there's there's just more there, it's just more dense.

I'm going to steal it. I'm going to take it, I'm gonna make it mine. You can do the same, it doesn't matter.

I have two more questions. One is is probably going to go over some people's heads and so I'm sorry, but it's it's a question that someone asked me and I like it and so I'm gonna make it here. So the one guy asked why the Protestants and Catholics most typically use translations of the Old Testament based on the Masoretic text, other than, and they use Roman numerals here the LXX, which I believe is the Septuagint correct, in worship Bible study and exegetical work? Like why do we lean towards I guess the Masoretic text as opposed to the Septuagint text?  

Tim Mackie 44:13

Yeah, yeah.

So what that question means is for the Old Testament, these texts were all written in Hebrew, about 200-ish years before Jesus, Jewish scholars down in Egypt began realizing like, oh, man, everybody's speaking Greek. We have Jewish kids who like don't even know Hebrew anymore when they grow up. So they produced, over the course of about a century, a translation of the Hebrew Scriptures into Greek. That became really popular and widespread, because as you get closer to the time of Jesus, everybody's speaking Greek. And so when the Jesus movement started, it was from the beginning a bi and trilingual movement and community. People spoke Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek, and Latin as well so quadlingual. And it was multinational, you know, pretty much from just about 50 days after people saw Jesus alive from the dead at Pentecost.

So what happened was that translation became widely popular in the early Jesus movement. In fact, it became the main way the followers of Jesus encountered the Bible, in the Greek in Greek speaking world. About 300 years after Jesus, that Greek translation was translated into Latin. And then that Latin translation was then corrected by somebody who knew Hebrew, a guy named Jerome, and that's called the Vulgate. And then that Latin Bible became the Bible of Western Christianity for a millennium.  

Seth Price 45:58 

Okay, I hope Jerome knew what he was doing. 

Tim Mackie 46:00 

Totally!

So the question is, why shouldn't just the Greek and Latin Bible be the Bible of Christianity? Well, here's what's interesting is when you look at Jesus and the Apostles, they were familiar with the Greek rendering of the Bible, they often use it in their quotations. But it's also very clear, that at the core, they knew it in the Hebrew. And this is a Protestant thing. And it actually has to do with concepts of inspiration. And I actually resonate with it to a certain degree.

I'm a follower of Jesus, and who he is is mediated to me by the Apostles and his earliest followers. And Jesus knew his Bible in Hebrew. He knew his Bible in Hebrew! That's the Bible that he was raised on. That's the Bible that he had memorized. That's the Bible that he prayed, you know, every night, and that's the Bible that, I think, where he discovered his identity and discovered who he was as he was growing up, and understood his vocation, and what it was called to do.

So if that's the case, I think there is a special, privileged, place of the original language of these texts that were so important to Jesus. And historically, that's where Protestants have landed is that the original language is going to get us closest to the meaning that the these authors wanted to communicate. And it's important to know the whole history though.

I ended up doing my dissertation on the Greek and Hebrew versions of the book of Ezekiel. Comprehensively mapping out all their differences. Dude, it's so interesting!

Seth Price 47:50

How many are there?

Time Mackie 47:52

Well, it depends on…I focused in on where there's an additional word or a missing word or phrase and there is in the ballpark of 400, it's not a small number. But what those differences are doing is so awesome. And tells us so much about the final shaping of the Aspen forest that is the Hebrew Bible. But that's for another day. (laughter)

So there you go. That's what that question is calling the Hebrew Bible, which is what that question is calling them as Radek Tex has been privileged. And I think there's a good case to be made for saying if I want to understand an author on their terms, I should probably read in the language that they wrote. That's what Jesus knew the Bible in. That's what I'm going to go to. But we should also honor the fact, just like we should honor the bigger Aspen forest, we should honor the fact that most Christians for most of church history have known the Bible in the Greek or Latin translation. And so we should understand what developments and changes happened in those translations, too. And there you go.  

Seth Price 48:55 

Yeah. So the final question just because I like to end on Jesus more often than not, and I usually don't, sometimes I don't. Actually lately Tim, I've always asked the question because of some of the topics of conversation like, is there hope that the church for my kids is even a healthy place to be? And that's a paraphrase of the question. And I don't want to necessarily ask you that, although you can answer it if you want…

Tim Mackie 49:18

Yeah.

Seth Price 49:19

…but it's disheartening to find so many people go, “I don't know. But whatever the church is, it looks probably very little like church does today”, which is scary. And not why we're here. But so when we talk about the metaphor of an Aspen forest, and then I hear you often, you know, in your videos, and you've got other podcasts that you've been on, and Exploring My Strange Bible is one of my favorite podcasts specifically, because I do it when I do housework.  

Tim Mackie 49:42 

(laughter) Yeah, sure. That's when I do by podcast listening too.

Seth Price 49:46 

Yeah, I literally listened to there was like an entire series. I think you were talking about Jonah, and Nineveh and then breaking it apart. And then what did you say I'm a badly paraphrase, but I'm out there painting and staining and you're like “It wasn't that Nineveh ‘here's’ like this as far as you can go in the known Earth”. And so he's not escaping to some arbitrary place like I want to leave the planet! And he won't let me leave!

And go, I didn't know this! I didn't know this!

(laughter from Tim)

So what is that Aspen forest, and so we'll call that Scripture, what is that pointing to? Which I know you argue, and I would agree, is Jesus. But how is that forest at the root level interwoven where if we could look underground, we're looking at it and be like, “Oh, I see. I see this. This is Jesus, and it's always been Jesus”.  

Tim Mackie 50:34 

Yeah, well, you know, the first three quarters of the Christian Bible doesn't belong only to Christians, right? It's the Hebrew Bible. And it's actually also the Scriptures in two other religious traditions. The one that came to existence in Judaism, and then after Christianity in Islam, too, they have an important place for the Hebrew scriptures in their Bible literature. So, that's just important to recognize.

So anytime a religious community says “this is what the Hebrew Scriptures are about”, you're making a controversial claim. Because there are multiple communities that claim that it means different things.

Seth Price 51:16 

Am I misquoting you? I feel like I’m not.  

Tim Mackie 51:17

No, no, you're not. Okay. I'm just I'm just saying we need to in the modern world, we need to be honest with that fact. Okay. However, I think that Jesus was right. Namely, these texts, and I'm referring to the Hebrew Bible, Jews call it to not Old Testament, Torah, prophets and writings. The way that these texts are designed, is as a composite unity. So it is the diverse collection of literature from the whole history of Israel's history. But as those circles of prophets from Moses all the way for over a millennium were shaping, editing, compiling, adding new, crafting, they engaged in a series of literary conventions to unify the whole collection around a core set of themes. And lo and behold, those core themes are introduced in the first 10 pages of the first scroll, what we call Genesis 1-11.

In Genesis 1-11, the whole storyline is anticipated; even its resolution is anticipated in seed form. And it has to do with humanity appointed as the image bearers of the Creator, creatures in whom Heaven and Earth meets, God and humanity meet together, and God appoints them to rule and steward over the creation but to trust his wisdom about good and bad. The humans don't want to trust wisdom about good and bad they want to take it for themselves. And then the story It just goes downhill really quick in terms of violence and self destruction. And the exaltation of human made empires, exalting our definitions of good and bad to divine status, and then we began killing each other over our different definitions of good and bad. This is what Babylon is in the Bible.

However, on page three, in Genesis 3, when God informs the humans of the consequences of their bad decisions, he says “that a seed is going to come”, which in Hebrew can be a plant, or a child, a seed is going to come who's going to reverse the self destruction of humanity and is going to reverse and overcome the power of evil that humans have given into. And it's a little poem in Genesis 3:15 that says, the seed of the woman is going to destroy evil at its source while being bitten and destroyed by it.

And in that little two line poem, Genesis 3:15, the entire storyline of the Bible is both anticipated and its resolution is pointed to. And basically the rest of the Hebrew Bible is just replaying, kind of like Star Wars, you watch movies in the Star Wars universe and you're kind of like, I've been here before, but the characters are different. It's never identical. There's three different Death Stars. But it's never the same.

Seth Price 54:29 

This time it is a planet. Spoiler alert it is a planet.  

Tim Mackie 54:33 

This is how this is how most of the classics and Western literature work is patterned story worlds that repeat generation after generation both repeats, but also intensifies the things of the past. And the whole Hebrew Bible is working in that direction.

And so the four Gospel accounts of Jesus have been designed precisely to plug right in to the narrative that the Hebrew Scriptures are developing and presenting Jesus as the one who overcomes evil by letting evil overcome him and overcoming it with his life and with his love.

And so that's what I mean, the unifying center I think of the whole Bible is Jesus. And well, actually, I should say, this way, post Jesus, I can say that pre Jesus, I think Jews were sitting around reading these Bibles saying, I'm waiting for the snake crusher to come who is going to crush evil. We're waiting for the new Moses. We're waiting for a new David, we're waiting for the prophet who is to come, we're waiting for the Messiah. And the gospels are saying, Yeah, Jesus, he is that one that the Hebrew Scriptures were pointing to.

So for me, that's how the whole collection makes sense, that's what it's about. And that's why I read it is because it helps me understand Jesus. I've learned to read other ancient texts and appreciate them, and Egyptian and Ugaritic and Canaanite text, I mean, it's cool stuff, man. But like, at the end of the day, really I just want to follow Jesus. I want to follow him with more passion and love people the way that he did, and know his love that can change me. And that's why I read these texts, because they have a unique power to introduce people to Jesus that can change their lives and change whole communities. And these texts have been doing that for thousands of years. And it's why we're still talking about them on the other side of the planet, 2000 years later.

So, all of the historical debates aside, the Bible isn't just something you learn about and put in your pocket. It's mediating a real person to us that is waiting for us to respond, not just to debate about and if we haven't done that personal response, then it's like ah why read it‽

Seth Price 57:04 

Point people in the right spot Tim, where do they go to? Where do we send people?  

Tim Mackie 57:09

The Bible, you just Google The Bible project, where our website is theBibleProject.com. And there you go, that's where you'll find everything. If you're interested in taking your Bible learning to the next level, the videos can be a helpful place to do that. But once you get into the website, we have actually whole web pages about every book of the Bible, with other videos and resources, recommended reading and stuff. So it's really kind of a whole Bible resource website.  

Seth Price 57:37 

Absolutely. So the links to those will be wherever you read the things, people. But Tim, thank you for making the time to come on. I'm glad we can get happen. I would love in seven or eight more months, we'll start planning it now, and we'll maybe do it again. Talk about other parts of the forest but genuinely I appreciate the work that you do. And I really appreciate you making the time to come on. 

Tim Mackie 57:58

Yes, absolutely. Yeah. Happy to talk about it. 

Seth Price 58:38 

Every conversation that I do, I'm always sad when it ends, but there's genuinely so many things that I didn't get to ask him that I wanted to and so maybe another time. But I learned so much from that and I really like the metaphor of a forest and you know the Torah, in the central core beliefs, that Jesus would have known and everyone else would have known as the middle of the forest, the densest part of the forest, the oldest part of the forest, the most rooted part of the forest when we're talking about Scripture. I never really thought about it that way. And I do like the analogy.

If you didn't at the beginning, and if you haven't in the past rate, and review the show on iTunes, it makes the world happy. And it makes the internet happy. And you don't want to make the internet not happy. But seriously, consider supporting the show in any way that you can rating and review the show and supporting the show on Patreon. And you'll find links to all the ways to do that at CanISayThisAtChurch.com? Please let me know your feedback on any of the episodes that you've heard. You'll also see that at the website. Today's music is from David Lunsford. You'll find the links to him in the show notes as well as his tracks from today's conversation. mixed into the Can I Say This At Church Spotify playlist. I'll talk with you all next week.

Goodbye, my friends.

The God Who Sees with Karen Gonzalez / Transcript

Note: Can I Say This at Church is produced for audio listening. If able, I strongly encourage you to listen to the audio, which has inflection, emotion, sarcasm where applicable, and emphasis for points that may not come across well in written word. This transcript is generated using a combination of my ears and software, and may contain errors. Please check the episode for clarity before quoting in print.

Back to the Audio Episode


Karen 0:00 

Yeah, so we have this term that I did not coin, it was coined by other Latinex theologians, and it's called Abuelita theology or grandmother theology. And basically what it says is that our faith is passed down, informally, by our mothers and our grandmothers. They become the ones who teach us about the faith, who teach us about faith traditions, and who really instill in us the sense of faith. And it's worked out in the everyday. Sometimes it's called kitchen theology, because, you know, you could be chopping onions or mopping the floor and having a conversation. And, really, it's a theology of survival because what you see here in the US, you know, I write about my grandmother, she did not have the luxury of sitting in a seminary class talking about theology or you know, what does it mean when you know, good people suffer or anything like that. She only had her everyday life. She worked as a domestic worker in Los Angeles for this wealthy family as a live in housekeeper. And she worked out her faith in the everyday in the ordinary tasks, as she's seeking survival. Because she's not thriving she's just surviving, you know, kind of breaking even. I talked about that in the book too, how many immigrants; this is where we're at. But that's what she passed down to us, you know, this, this faith of survival. You know, she didn't have even a high school diploma. But she had this PhD in Abuelita theology, you know, of being able to really pass down the resilience, you know, that she had because of her faith, the strength that she received from God because of the faith. So yeah, that's what that's about.  

Seth Price 2:00 

The United States is something larger than we choose to admit that we are—we’re a nation, and we're entirely powerful. And with that power, comes a lot of strings. People look to us for leadership. And we like to think that we're good leaders, but we're not. Look down at the border, turn on the news and see the people that we turn away, especially my Christian Brothers and sisters, we have a faith that we don't do well. We're called to love people and yet immigration is an issue that politically, and not politically, I mean, even in the church, we discuss it in a way that we have a vehement hate for what I'll call “the other” and it's awful. I'm Seth, welcome to the Can I Say This At Church podcast. today's conversation is about that. Karen Gonzalez has written a beautiful book about a Christian view of immigration and theology that challenges my own theology that speaks to a truth that I find beautiful and challenging. So I hope that you enjoy this conversation.  

Seth Price 3:46 

Karen, thank you so much for joining the Can I Say This At Church podcast. I've become a big fan of yours, mostly on Twitter, a little bit on Facebook, but I like the things that you say. And you have a book coming out. I believe in, is it April?  

Karen 4:02 

May 21!

Seth Price 4:04 

Dang it. Well, in May, that's fine. I was close. I was going from memory. And that book is also fantastic. And so I'm excited to have you on the show to discuss some of the, well, I'm trying to rightly phrase my thoughts on the book. So there’s so much in here that is deeply personal. And so there's a lot of theology in here. But there's a lot of you in here, which I think makes the greatest books, but they also are the hardest books to read and sometimes talk about. So thank you for making the time to come on the show.  

Karen 4:34 

Thank you, Seth. It's great to be here. I've been a fan of the show and appreciated a lot of conversations I've heard here.

Seth Price 4:41 

I appreciate that a lot.  

There will be people I'm certain that are unfamiliar with you, and possibly unfamiliar with the organization I believe you've worked with in the past or you might still work with World Relief, but before we get there, what is it that makes Karen tick if in for those that haven't read the book yet, and No, you haven't, because it isn't out yet. A lot of that is in there. But just in brief, what is made you, the woman that you are today?  

Karen 5:07 

Well, that's a great question. And I think a lot of things have, but a lot of what I've come to realize has made me is my journey of immigration, encountering God through that experience. And then also, since I've been working with World Relief, advocating and serving with the immigrant community. And I want to be careful to differentiate that from serving the immigrant community from serving alongside. And so I've been able to see what it's like to have my own community advocate for themselves and with allie, but also they're feeling empowered to advocate for their inclusion and welcome into this country; and also for the message of the neutrality of immigration, that there's blessing in it, both for the citizen that's welcoming and the immigrant is being received.  

Seth Price 6:15 

In the book, you walk through your upbringing and I really like how you keep revisiting what I'm going to loosely call the sacraments, you know, baptism and the Eucharist. I'm curious kind of your faith journey because you started out, well, it seems like your parents weren't extremely the most religious, but you started out kind of in the Catholic faith and then what sect or denomination do you have now? Like, what is what is home for you?  

Karen 6:42 

So I attend an African American Lutheran Church. And I know that sounds like what‽ But it's a city church here in Baltimore. And I did start out in the Catholic Church and then moved toward The Conservative Evangelical Church and the young adult. And after seminary, I went to Fuller Seminary, I found my way back to more liturgical churches. And I would say the church that I attend now is a beautiful combination of, you know, black church tradition, as well as Lutheran liturgy and theology. And really what drew me there was that it's fully inclusive. It includes women and leadership and includes the LGBTQ community at all levels. But it's also a church made up primarily of people of color. And that's also sacred.

Seth Price 7:40 

Yeah, I often, as I look out from my church, often there's just so much, not that there's anything wrong with so much homogenization, is that the right word like there's just so much at the same at my church. And one of the things I think that we're good at sometimes is not assigning token roles to those that aren't necessarily white. Like just letting them be, and fit in. Because I have, I have a friend that used to play drums with us. And she would be like, I hate that; and she's African American, and every time that we have a song or something that has to have a different flair, I'm the token black person or the token, whatever that has to do the African drum beat or the, whatever, whatever, for Black History Month. And she’s like it just annoys me that I'm the token person that has to do that. So I would love if every church was a mix of everything, but I honestly don't know if that's ever gonna happen. If I'm talking out loud, that's very sad. That's not why I brought you on. I don't want to be sad. 

So your book, The God Who Sees I like that a lot, especially because I didn't really ever and so that plays on Ishmael and Hagar those at least from as reading it. I didn't know that that's what those words meant. And like you I don't really know what my name means. I don't know if I care or not, but I'm probably gonna go But I still don't know what it means. But I know I don't know what it feels like to be an immigrant. And I don't know what it feels like to not actually already fit in with the way that the world is programmed to work. And as I get older, I've realized how true that is and how wrong that is but that doesn't mean it's also not currently true. It's a problem that needs to be fixed. And so at the beginning of your book, you kind of walk through, you know, Ruth and Naomi and how, if they showed up today at the border, like they wouldn't qualify for this Visa, they definitely wouldn't qualify to enter the country for “this”. 

I wanted you for those listening to kind of break down you know, as we talk about these church figures and these religious figures and these pillars of examples that we learn from, hopefully weekly at church but at least sometimes during the year that we would not, if they showed up today coming up, you know in the caravans that are coming up semi frequently. We would have the same issues today that if we treated them like that then maybe these stories wouldn't even exist in the Bible. But I'd love if you could break that apart because I didn't know half of that, especially the way immigration works and Visas work and the U-Visas like, I didn't know any of that. So I read those portions a couple times like this is I like new information. This is fantastic.  

Karen 10:24 

Yeah. 

You know, I love the story of Ruth and I always have I talked in the book about encountering it for the first time. And it had never been taught to me as a book that was about the story of immigrants. First, Naomi and her husband immigrate to Moab. Then when tragedy and famine strike, she immigrates back to her homeland, and she brings an immigrant woman with her a more white daughter in law, who is Ruth and the way that Ruth is treated when she comes to my Moab, to me is remarkable. You know, reading the Bible you read so many times when the Israelites refused to obey God, refused to obey God's commands and laws, and they ended up sometimes, you know, in exile as a result of it. And that's a story that's really common. And over and over again, you see God's grace and God's call to bring his people back, sending prophet after prophet to bring them back. 

But in the story of Ruth, you have people of Judah, do exactly what God says. They welcomed Ruth. She's allowed to go onto fields to glean. She's allowed to have Sabbath just like God says she should. She shares a table with them. She's protected. She's not, you know, a victim of violence or harassment in the field because she's a foreigner. And she's welcomed to such a degree that she marries, you know, someone from that community. And we know for so she ends up in the lineage of Jesus, she becomes a great grandmother of King David. And it’s a remarkable story. 

But I did want to draw readers to what would happen if rather than coming to Judah, when Ruth arrived at our border, and these are all the ways that people can enter our country, and she wouldn't qualify for any of them should be turned away, and she returned to Moab. Or she would die in the desert, or she would die in the famine. We don't know what would happen to her Naomi would enter because Naomi’s a citizen, and she's an older woman who's a widow, as we know, these are people who suffer great marginalization and poverty in the ancient world. Who knows what will happen to Naomi as well? And I really wanted to draw the reader's attention to that. Of course, they lived in the ancient world where these things, these laws that we have are not an effect. But I wanted people to know that of all the ways that are available to an immigrant to migrate, Ruth would not qualify.  

Seth Price 13:21 

So there's a line that you write just I like the word, there’s a line that you write in your book that says that there is bad Mojo between Moab and Israel. I don't know enough Old Testament. I just don't. Why is there that bad Mojo and then is there anything like that today? Like if we think about immigrants, at least coming into America, because that's where I live and so that's what most I have impact on. Like, what would be a correlate…correlate….I don't know that that word is a correlating Mojo to other countries and how would that into play?  

Karen 13:55 

So for the Israelites, I mean, the moment descended from Lots incestuous union with his daughters. And because of that they were banned from the assembly, Israelites were forbidden to marry more white women. I mean, they had a lot of disdain for them. And the only thing I can correlate with the New Testament is the way that people in the New Testament felt about Samaritans, right, very similar dynamic. But in our context, it might be more like the way many Americans feel about Muslims. This kind of suspicion, almost discussed and this, you know, kind of worries about national security. And along, you know, the border people might feel that way about Central Americans and Mexicans that are coming in. And just the sense of, you know, "this is our country”. You remember that journalist who recently said, you know, he's talking About the “browning of America”, and he was really concerned about having brown grandbabies. So this kind of language is very similar to what we see with the Moabites and the people of Judah.  

Seth Price 15:16 

Yeah. Well, I remember that journalist saying that, and I can remember other things said against, and it always strikes me as odd that it's always Muslims that are picked on, as if there aren't other religions and other cultures that that also could, I guess, be a threat, quote, unquote, to Christianity. But you don't hear people yelling about Sikhs, you don't hear people really yelling about Buddhists or Hindus, or for some reason, it's always quote unquote, “illegal immigrants” or “Muslims” and everyone else is fine. These are the only threat that matter. That may just be because the circles that I run in, just repeat what's on Fox News, and maybe that's all they care about. And so maybe that's all that I think that people care about. Maybe that's just a bad input coming into my feeds. But I feel like America as a whole really only has an issue with those handful of people. Which is funny because there is no way to stop using his words the browning of America because overall, there are I mean, people…people have so many different colors. It doesn't really matter what it's white is not. I don't know, it's a stupid analogy. It's, it's a dumb thing to say. 

But also, I mean, Muslims are coming to America, regardless of whether or not we want them to. And if we don't prepare for it, it's gonna be an awful thing. Like you have to figure out a way to integrate with people that don't necessarily agree with you on everything without blowing each other up, or yelling each other, or picking fights with each other or building fences in between our property lines, like we want to build walls along our government lines. I feel like when I watch people bicker about all that it's like me watching my children bicker. Like I'm not entirely certain why y'all are arguing about this, this doesn't really matter who's holding the remote or it doesn't really matter what God you're praying to. Let's talk about this. Let's figure out what we can learn from each other. And possibly love each other.

Karen 17:18 

Right! And the fact that it’s a simple thing that happens all the time. You know, we have these movements back and forth from welcoming immigrants and reveling in this, you know, legacy of our nation as one of immigrants, which I have trouble with that because it erases black Americans brought here in chains and it erases Indigenous people who have always been here. But we seem to have this sort of immigrant amnesia groups. As every new group has come to America, they've experienced the same thing. It's almost, you know, there was the same attitude toward Italians, toward Polish people, toward Eastern European Jewish people. No, no, yeah, that's the kind of movement from xenophobia to philoxenia back and forth of like you know, reveling in our past but being suspicious of current immigrants.

Seth Price 18:03 

So it's like you knew where I wanted to go because in bold here, you can't see it but in bold because I can't make my notes show up on my laptop, so I have a new wrote down Boaz practices true hospitality, which I think is the hope and the goal for Christians today, where you say "philoxenia, as it's called in the New Testament, is a love of strangers and foreigners versus xenophobia”, which is the exact opposite, but I don't honestly think that many people especially and I feel like you're similar in age to me, you know, under 40. Those aren't words that we really talk about, or even know what they mean. And I think other people operate from one of those two extremes and they don't even know that they are. And so what does that mean to act as with a with a posture of philoxenia, as opposed to xenophobia?   

Karen 19:00 

Philoxenia is really a love and welcome of immigrants. And it really stems from just the way that many of us give to the church, out of obedience to God and out of trust, that there will be enough. That God will provide for us despite our generosity. It's the same with philoxenia except we're giving of our country, we're giving a lot of resources, and we're giving up our very selves. And so it's trusting in God, that there will be enough resources for us that our countries will and then it won't take from us in any way, right to welcome immigrants. And so we welcome them into our communities. We treat them justly. We allow them to work without exploitation. 

You know, in Ruth, you see that Ruth does the work that everyone else does. But I know in my city in Baltimore, immigrants do the work nobody else wants to do? And that is different from what you see in the ancient world, you know, God said, Yes, agricultural work it's very hard work. But it's exactly the kind of work everybody else is doing. So it's not especially difficult for her because she's an immigrant. And there's no exploitation. There's no “Oh, we're gonna take this from you”. 

I have a good friend who was just telling me about her uncle who worked for a Christian man for 20 years. Her uncle was an immigrant from Mexico. And after 20 years, he changed jobs. And when he changed jobs, he went up to his boss, and he said, I think you made a mistake with my paycheck. You didn't take out the 10% for the church. And the man was like, “what!” He's like, “yes, my previous boss always took 10% of my salary to give to the church”. And his current boss was like, “that's illegal. No, that's not right. And it's your money if you want to give 10% of it to the church. Sure, go ahead”. 

But we hear stories like this all the time of immigrants, and that's the biggest crime committed against immigrants is wage theft and mistreatment at work. It's very, very common. But what you see in the book of Ruth, is she gets the same protections as every other citizen. She does the same kind of work. She's treated with dignity. She's treated with respect, she's protected like every other worker. It's really the way it should be for all of us, because I think even in that case, you know, the oppressor loses his or her own humanity in oppressing the immigrant and taking, you know, from them. And of course, the immigrant is exploited and is robbed of wages they rightfully earned, and mistreated. Yeah, I think the way that our system exists currently this outdated immigration system that we have, it creates these conditions that are ripe for exploitation?  

Seth Price 22:02 

This isn't a theological question but I wanted to ask you because you have more knowledge on the subject than I do. If you could change one thing about our immigration system like today, tomorrow, it's law, and it's done, and anything that doesn't fit into that law is immediately absolved. If you could change one thing, Karen, what would it be like? This is what I've done. And it's done. For me in banking, it would be redlining, if I got rid of redlining and make it effective in history. So many of the populations in the way that we apportion schools, and tax revenue, and dollars, and gerrymandering, so much of that would be different that the entire climate and landscape of America would look different, just from getting rid of redlining. If you don't know what redlining is, and you're listening, I'm sorry, I usually don't talk about banking, but that's actually what I get paid to do for a living. So if you could do that, Karen, with immigration, what would it be? What's the one thing that you're like this is the thing that when I pull this lever lives are changed immediately and irrevocably? 

Karen 23:05 

So if I could change one thing about immigration, it would be the racial component that made up most federal laws until the Immigration and Nationality Act, which occurred during the 60s. But prior to that law, every other federal immigration law had a racial component to it. The Chinese Exclusion Act, you know, excluded, of course, Chinese people, other acts excluded Southern Europeans, excluded Asian Americans, excluded Latinos, you might have heard of Operation Wetback and the way that it tried to keep Mexicans from crossing the border

Seth Price 23:47

Is that the actual name?  

Karen 23:48 

That's the actual name.  

Seth Price 23:51 

Oh my Lord! No, I have not heard of that. That is, oh my gosh! I'm from Texas and so I know how bad of a word that is. Like that's just an awful word.  

Karen 24:00

It's a terrible word. And it's now considered this terrible slur. But that's what it was actually called by our government. And so if I could go back and and throughout all history affect that change, lives will be transformed families reunited, you know, it would change the whole game.  

Seth Price 24:25 

I want to say this, right? So when you get into some of your upbringing, you talk about your baptism. And you go and you revisit baptism a couple times along with some of the other sacraments. as I alluded to earlier, there's a part where you say, and so I wrote this down, “wishing we could return to a faith of childhood faith when it was easy faith when we didn't know what the words meant”. And then after that, you say something that I would like you to break apart. And so you say “though, I had little understanding of this sacred initiation into the church”, and by that I believe you mean baptism in the Catholic Church. So "though I had little understanding of this sacred initiation into The Church, the body of Christ, it was a beginning. Baptism set me on a path toward knowing God”. I've never really heard baptism done that way. Because the way I was baptized, it was my choice. And so can you break that apart? Like, how did something from possibly when I don't even remember how old you were, but you had to be young? 

Karen 25:18 

I was like six months old or something?  

Seth Price 25:20 

So how can something that happens in that way, especially when you've said that your parents don't really, you know, aren't really practicing, I guess, is probably the best word. And if I'm wrong on that, correct me, how would it…how could that be the beginning on setting you toward a path?  

Karen 25:36 

Sure. Well, I firmly believe that most Protestants, particularly those outside of mainline denominations, really misunderstand baptism in you know, in the church historically. And of course, I'm talking about the Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church, even the early Protestant church, it was seen as a sacred rite of initiation into the church. And the reason that infants were baptized is because it was seen as the parents having this desire, right to dedicate this child, to the church and to committing to raising this child within the church and its values. And so, my parents were not really Christian. They were nominal Catholics, cultural Catholics I would say, and so they baptized me as more of a tradition than anything. But the interesting thing is that I have always felt drawn to God because in fact, even though it did not mean anything to them, other than celebration of family, it didn't mean anything spiritually—God knew me. And there was a sense of calling and longing for God that I always had an interest in knowing God. And being part of the church, you know, I went to Catholic schools. I went to Catholic parish and I did my first communion there. I mean, you're around this environment where you are, you know, I read the same thing about the prosperity gospel, believe it or not, that a lot of people will go to these prosperity gospel churches, you know churches where they preach like God came to give us health and wealth… 

Seth Price 27:23 

mmhhmm.

I’m not a fan.  

Karen 27:24 

And initially, you know, of course, they're excited by this idea. But then a lot of these are Protestant churches, where you start to read the Bible and you encounter Jesus. Even though the church itself may be unhealthy and maybe promoting theology is extremely harmful you can still encounter Jesus in an environment like that. And it was very similar for me. 

You know, my parents were not interested. But that baptism, I always know about it, and I've seen pictures of it, and it set me on this path for knowing God. When people ask me, I was like, “Yes, I was baptized in the Catholic church” because the second baptism that I talked about in the book, I see more as a confirmation because by then I did have understanding.

Seth Price 28:46

I can distinctly remember, you know, as a child being baptized and it being a big deal. I mean, my son was just baptized in the fall of last year and it's such a good thing. Because I mean, we do have those discussions and so yeah, when I read that, like it just didn't click in my head because again, of my upbringing and the way I was raised and the fact that there's so few, at least where I was from, there's just so few Catholics, at least that I was aware of. Although I feel like there's a bigger presence in that, because where I'm from in Texas, there's a huge, you know, Mexican American and just Mexican population period. One of my best friends in high school, you know, quote, unquote, “converted” out of Catholicism and Protestantism, I don't know if converted is the right word. But that's the word he would use. So I'll steal that from him. When I read that I was just not confused but more like I don’t…these two pieces don't fit together well, in my head. 

One of the things that's heartbreaking and heartbreaking because I've also seen it happen locally, and I've discussed it with people happening locally is so many people that are here now that are immigrants they don't report crimes, because if they report crimes, they're instantly going to be you know, ICE is going to come and pick them up and break apart families. And you tell a couple stories in that and one of the ones that I like the most that you tell why I don't like let me get this straight. I like the way you tell the story. The story itself is awful, is a guy named Francisco that was arrested and ultimately deported because he was asleep. Instead of driving drunk, he decided to just get sleep-just go to sleep, but just be in the car keys not in the ignition so he can't be accused of driving. And then he just didn't know what the law was. And honestly, I as I was thinking back to like my college days, like I did that often. 

Like, I probably shouldn't drive right now. I'll fall asleep until I wake up and I'll be fine. And it just breaks apart of family. And then you go on to relate that to Abraham is the criminal immigrant which is not a way I've ever in my entire life heard Abraham presented to anyone, in any way shape or form. And then as you walk through, I don't know if these are your words or mine. I feel like they're mine. But I put “the punk is willing to sacrifice his wife for survival”. And that might be your words. I don't remember. But he basically sex trafficked his wife not once but twice. And I don't think anyone usually talks about that. And if they do, I'm unfamiliar with it. What do you mean when you're saying that Abraham is a criminal immigrant? 

Karen 31:17 

Yes. And I say that knowing how deeply uncomfortable that makes people. And I say that understanding Abraham's full story and the fears that he had coming into a foreign land. But Abraham and his wife because of famine, it's always need that prompts people to migrate. And in Abraham's case, it's famine and it's the call of God. (He) arrives in Egypt, there was probably some sort of, you know, ancient sort of gates at the, at the, you know, edges of the land, or some sort of, you know, common road that many people took since Egypt was a very common place to go to in times of famine because of the Nile and fact that they didn't suffer the same when there was a lack of rain in the land. 

And so, when he enters he, he presents a half truth. He says Sarah is his sister, which is a very convenient truth, but she's also his wife. And so he commits this fraud to enter this land. And then he basically tell Sarah, you know, they're gonna kill me because of you because you're beautiful and because they'll want to have you and so, basically go along with this for my sake. So she does and she's taken into Pharaoh's palace and Abraham grows extremely wealthy as a result. You know, we read in the text that he gained flocks, he gained land, he gained all of these things, while Sarah suffered sexual abuse and exploitation right and at the, at the hands of Pharaoh. And so our modern standards he commits fraud, entering crossing into a new land. And he commits human trafficking by sacrificing his wife for his own well being. 

And most of us would say, you know, not only are those crimes today, but morally we would say, you know, to save himself he allowed Sarah to suffer. So it’s an extremely troubling part of the story and not a story, as you know, as you pointed out, that's usually focused on. And while it's uncomfortable, we also understand why he made these choices. You know, there was great fear, probably right, he probably would have been killed or enslaved or who knows what might have happened to him if he had said, This is my beautiful wife and I'm entering into your land. And so we take all these factors and we consider the whole story of Abraham. This is why he made these choices and in spite of this, in spite of these transgressions, God kept the promise to Abraham.  

Seth Price 34:04 

The tension that I had with that was (that) so many people read the Bible in a way that gives them permission to act in a way that they were already going to. Yeah, I think that's the best way to say that. So, you know, if you talk about slavery or women can't be in ministry, because there's this one passage that says that they can't and so overall they're not allowed to forget all the other women in the Bible that actually were leaders in ministry; forget about them because of this one thin. And my fear is what if it was okay for Abraham? Because we know the whole story, how would it possibly not be okay for today, with if we know the whole story three or four generations from now, if some guy in Chile, or some guy in India, or some woman in Russia, basically gets into any country because of that, how would it not possibly be okay in the same lens?  

Karen 35:06 

Mm hmm. 

Really what at the point that I was drawing there, it's not that Abraham is an example for us to follow or even that laws are not important—because I believe that they are and they're written to guide us and protect us. Even God's laws are given for that same purpose. So it's not given as a model, but more as a these are the mitigating circumstances that drove Abraham to these desperate, wrong actions. And reading them I understand why he took those actions, I still think it's wrong. And I still think he should have trusted it his God, that his God could have finally found a way out of that situation. But do I think that this is a model for other people to follow in terms of well, you know, Abraham, it's so it's okay for me? I think there is a sense in the text, the fact that this story is shared, that this was wrong. That, you know, we get this well rounded perspective on Abraham. It's kind of like finding out what a misogynist and anti-semite Martin Luther was. It's like, okay, this is really horrible. But also he was a human being he was not, you know, Jesus, right. 

And it's the same thing with Abraham. We get a well rounded view of a complicated human being who did some terrible things for survival. And so I liken it to, you know, we extend this sort of grace to Abraham because we know his whole story, and we know about his journey with God. And he's a model of faith. But when we have someone like Francisco who didn't know you could get a DUI with a car turned off and the keys in your pocket, napping…

Seth Price 36:54 

And actually not driving. 

Karen 36:56 

And actually not driving! (Not) someone who crosses the border because their family's starving. So these are not actions that are even harming other human beings. You know, you're just he's just sleep napping in his car, letting the alcohol wear off, just seeking survival crossing across the border, which by the way, still considered a criminal misdemeanor. And yet, people take that as criminal, you know, this is a criminal person, they broke the law, and they want to enact these really harsh consequences. You know, what Francisco suffered is a real tragedy to me, because in every other way, other than having crossed the border and taking a nap in his car, he was a model citizen with within the US in the way that he lived his life in terms of citizenship, you know, his care of his neighbors, and yet, he still suffered this deportation.  

Seth Price 37:56 

Yeah, there's two more things that I really want to touch on. But before I do, you as a person have a lot of knowledge on the way that specifically when we're talking about the immigrant population coming to America today, that the policies that we have done as Americans have greatly impacted the reasonings that they come here. And then I find as I try to educate people on that, I'm an entirely uneffective. And so one of the favorite episodes that I've done is a multi part series with Paul Thomas on Oscar Romero. And I learned so much in that. 

Karen 38:30

I loved that! 

Seth Price 38:32

Yeah, there's multiple parts. I think only one part is live everywhere. But so much of that I'll tell people that and then they just don't believe me. And so as a human, not necessarily read into the book that changed the way that I view immigration. Because I still used to say one thing, but then I still had attention on the way that I acted. But the more history that I get, the more I'm like, Oh my gosh, this is my fault. Not my fault, but my as Americans fault and there's a responsibility, not to right that wrong, but a responsibility to not perpetuate more wrongness and a responsibility to reap what we sowed, I guess for lack of a better word. 

So how do you speak to people that just don't have that history? Like what's the best avenue for people to dive into or to converse about that without it becoming a name calling session? Or a, you just don't like Republicans, or you just don't like Democrats or you just don't like people from Venezuela or you just, because that's what it ends up being for me, when I try to do that is you just don't like Ronald Reagan says nothing to do with Reagan. There were a lot of other people that also make those decisions. He just happened to be the president. But there's also Congress and governors and other people and other parties in in those countries as well. Like there's a lot of people responsible here. I just don't talk well to it. So for those listening because one thing as I deal more and more with immigration, I find that I’m severely lacking in history of how we got here.  

Karen 40:05 

Yeah, so part of what I do is I do share when people ask me, especially about my own immigration story, I let them know. And I start the book out that way for that very reason. I wanted people to know how good our life in Guatemala was, and how my parents had no plan, no desire, to ever leave our country. And I want people to have that sense, you know, and that really, for us, the push factor became the civil war that was funded by the United States. 

Now, I know it was because of the Cold War. And I know it was because there was this great fear of communism spreading to the United States. But even knowing that, it's still a fact and you know, a lot of the effects that we see today are because of those choices made in the 1970s and early 80s, I always tell people, that both Democrats and Republicans have been equally bad at immigration. And Republicans have been slightly better. Because in fact, you know, George W. Bush, who had a lot of faults was better for immigration to Barack Obama. And that's fact. 

Seth Price 41:20

Really? 

Karen 41:22

Yeah. Barack Obama, in the immigration advocacy work, we call him the deporter in chief. Because he in fact deported more immigrants than most President in the modern era. Yeah, it's a fact. Bill Clinton-extremely bad for immigrants. He instituted the 10 year bar, which has been so harmful and kept so many people… 

Francisco could be a resident and a citizen today, if it wasn't for this statute that Bill Clinton instituted, where he said, Oh, if you accumulate more than six months or a year of unlawful presence, you have to go back to your country for three years, if it's only six months, and if it's more than that 10 years before you can come back and apply for a green card, even if you're married to a US citizen, even if you have US citizen children, even if you're gainfully employed and you're the only breadwinner. So, in contrast, Ronald Reagan had this amnesty, by the way lots of my relatives were able to become residents and then citizens through Ronald Reagan's amnesty. George Bush, and I believe it's because he comes from a border state, also have more generous policies toward immigrants and immigration. He grew up with immigrants, you know, and his ranch in Texas. 

And so I always tell people, look, this is not a Democrats are really good at this and Republicans are really bad. Historically, both have done harm, but the republicans are slightly winning; believe it or not, in terms of more welcoming policies. But really, we have to take some responsibility for the choices our nation made. And maybe that's the information we had back in the 70s. Communism is a threat! Who knew that in 15 years, the Soviet Union was going to collapse completely, you know, we didn't know that in 1977. And so they started funding these terrible or the cause effects of people like Romero, and lots of people in my country. And I talked about the fact that I encountered dead bodies in my neighborhood that were dumped by, you know, the military.  

Seth Price 43:34 

That story of that body in the river…I had to put the book down. Like I just, because I can walk out into the back well, not the backyard but walk not far from here and just there's rivers, there's a river not far from here that you can just kayak all the way to the James River if you wanted to. I can't imagine you know, going down there with my kids or going down there myself and just, well, there's a…there’s a human being in the water. Like I just can't do it. Regardless of the age I can imagine, it breaks my heart. Yeah, that tweet you said the other day where you're like I there's parts of this book that I can't read out loud. Like, I'm assuming that means that you're recording the audio book for your book. I'm assuming that that's what that means. But yeah, being that I read the book, I'm like, I think I know some of those parts, but I don't. I don't know. There's a lot to be said that you even wrote them down to begin with, in a way that it's there's so much bare in this book for you I think so.  

Karen 44:31 

Yeah. And for me, I wanted to tell the story, because often, if we just say things like, Oh, well, you know Seth, the United States funded this war in El Salvador and Guatemala. It's sort of nameless, faceless rhetoric. And I wanted to share this is how that decision impacted my family specifically. And not just my nuclear family, but also my extended family. You know, most everyone in my family fled during that time. And I'm hoping that the fact that people see something more personal in it will speak to them in a way that sharing rhetoric or statistics or talking about wars doesn't seem to impact people as you said.

Seth Price 45:20 

Yeah, yeah. Well, and if anything, that's the way Jesus told truth says, You asked me a question. Let me tell you a story. I'm not gonna answer your question. You asked me this question. Let me tell you a story about this guy. Or let me tell you a story about these farmers. So let me tell you a story about this rich guy. So I think there's a lot to be learned from not answering questions directly, although I'm very bad at it. I'm very, very bad at that. I like to just, this is input A, here's the answer B and we're done with that. 

One of the things that I most liked about your book, and I wrote it down. So you talked about the theology of survival, and like that, and Abuelita Theology I've never heard that. And so what is, is that the theology of your grandmother or like an all encompassing like theology of survival is from where we come from this is how, you know matrons that are in the leadership role talk about God? Like, break, like, I'm not familiar with that. And as I read about it, I'm like, I like this. I like this a lot.  

Karen 46:22 

Yeah, so we have this term that I did not coin. It was coined by other Latinex theologians, and it's called Abuelita Theology or grandmother theology. And basically what it says is that our faith is passed down informally by our mothers and our grandmothers. They become the ones who teach us about the faith, who teach us about faith traditions, and who really instill in us the sense of faith. And it's worked out in the everyday. Sometimes it's called kitchen theology, because you know, you could be chopping onions or mopping the floor and having a conversation. Really, it's a theology of survival because what you see, like here in the US you know, I write about my grandmother, she did not have the luxury of sitting in a seminary class talking about theology or, you know, what does it mean when, you know, good people suffer or anything like that. She only had her everyday life. She worked as a domestic worker in Los Angeles for this wealthy family as a live in housekeeper. And she worked out her fate in the every day in the ordinary tasks as she's seeking survival. Because she's not thriving. She's just surviving, you know, kind of breaking even I talked about that in the book too, how many immigrants This is where we're at. But that's what she passed down to us, you know, this faith of survival. You know, she didn't have even a high school diploma, but she had this PhD in Abuelita Theology of being able to really pass down that she had because of her faith, the strength that she received from God because of the faith. And so yeah, that's what that's about.  

Seth Price 48:08 

I liked it a lot. I'd like to end on Jesus. And so if anything from the last hour that people listen to, and as they read your book, what do you want them to take home as something that is generative in their lives that they can change; to just maybe do this slightly better? Because it's going to take there's no way that it's going to be a huge lever, and tomorrow we have it fixed. And so what would you like people to take away at the very end if they haven't listened to anything if they've checked out stop! Stop, pull over your car, pay attention you in the back row. Listen, listen in! What would be the one thing like hey, just if you don't hear anything else, do this and do it? What would that be?  

Karen 48:48 

I would say the one thing you should do is ask yourself where did I learn about immigration? Did I learn it from Jesus from the Gospels from the Old Testament? Did I learned it from my family? Did I learn it from Fox News? Did I learn it from social media? Where did I learn about immigration where do all the beliefs I have about it come from? 

Because if you're a Christian, your views on that human issue, which is a human issue, so it's a Biblical issue, should be informed primarily by your faith. You know, what does Jesus say about this? What does the Hebrew Scriptures, what do they say about immigration? And I would say that's the one thing you can ask yourself, because I asked myself that question, and realized, I heard a lot of rhetoric from my family. I'd heard a lot of things in church circles. I've heard a lot of things in social circles. But my views were not always imposed primarily by what the Bible says and what Jesus says. I would think that is the one thing I would want people to really reflect on and think about honestly, and just really be transparent with in the presence of the Holy Spirit, you know, asking yourself this question.  

Seth Price 50:13 

Does your book have a subtitle?  

Karen 50:16 

Yes, it's Immigrants, the Bible and the Journey to Belong  

Seth Price 50:19 

Because I was gonna say, if it doesn't, what you just said, it's a human issue so it's a Biblical issue. I wrote that down, I'm stealing that. I just want to make sure I didn't plagiarize or copyright because I like that a lot. Like that is…that’s gonna turn into something today. It's going, it's going somewhere. I like that a lot. Because that's encompassing more than immigration. I mean, that encompasses a lot of things. Yeah. that encompasses everything because we're all humans. And so every issue we have is a human issue. Where can people connect with you, Karen? I know you're active on social media. Where can they as they're listening to this as the book is released, where can they get the book? How do they engage and wrestle with this with you if they want to?

Karen 51:00 

So I have a website, Karen-Gonzalez.com. And I'm also on Twitter and Instagram @_KarenJGonzalez so they can connect with me there. I'm also on Facebook and my Facebook page is pretty public so you can connect with me there as well. And the book is available for pre order on Amazon. It releases May 21. So on that day, it'll be like you forgotten about it, and now you have a surprise.  

Seth Price 51:28 

So pre order now. Well, thank you for coming on. Thank you for your patience and the messes up in scheduling and Zoom being whatever it is and either way, thank you. I'm glad we finally made it happen.   

Karen 51:40

Yeah. Thank you Seth! I really appreciate it.  

Seth Price 52:21 

Think back at that tail end there, right there at the end. If it is a human issue, it's a gospel issue. If it's a human issue, it's a Biblical issue. What if we live that way? What if we acted and treated and loved and cared for and protected and honored other people that way? Shoot would have we honored just the people in our neighborhoods that way? I don't even know what would happen. I know that the world would be different and I know it would be different instantly. I hope that you enjoyed today's conversation. If you did not or have not yet considered going to CanISayThisAtChurch.com clicking that support button in the top right become a patron of the show. You're what make the show work. If you can't do that, if you're not financially in a place to pitch in less than a very, very, very bad cup of coffee a month share the show. Rated on iTunes. Tell your friends…it helps.  

The music today is from artists Collington. You'll find links to their tracks, as well as their website in the show notes. As always on the Can I Say This At Church Spotify playlist. 

Talk to you next week. Be blessed.